I found the book interesting enough, but the good ideas are hidden in dense, lofty prose. Whilst I appreciate it is useful to mention great novels when writing about plot, Anson Dibell uses more titles than most; the same old books, almost clichés in a writers' reference book these days. Examples: 'Star Wars', 'The Grapes of Wrath', 'Vanity Fair', 'Wuthering Heights', 'Bleak House', 'Lord of the Rings', and so on. All good stuff, yes, but I got the feeling I was being told. 'Look, I can't plot much better than you, dear reader, but I know a good plot when I see one!' As I didn't want to turn out yet another 'High Noon', or a 'Jason and the Argonauts', in different settings, I started with a character suited to my story idea, and then outlined, after lots of old fashioned thinking. I coupled that with Michael Leggat's book on plot, and went for it. Strangely, I ended up with an outline that was based on 'The Hero with a Thousand Faces'. Serendipity indeed.