- Mass Market Paperback: 320 pages
- Publisher: Penguin Books Ltd; New edition edition (26 May 1994)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0140187650
- ISBN-13: 978-0140187656
- Product Dimensions: 19.6 x 12.7 x 1.8 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
-
Amazon Bestsellers Rank:
208,644 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #13 in Books > History > Military History > War Crimes > Genocide
- See Complete Table of Contents
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Penguin Twentieth Century Classics) for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
This report on the trial of German Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann first appeared as a series of articles in "The New Yorker" in 1963. This edition contains further factual material that came to light after the trial, as well as Arendt's postscript commenting on the controversy that arose over her book.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful
Format:Mass Market Paperback
Arendt is at pains to explain that this book was just a trial report and she is further at pains to dispel the idea of controversy that seems to surround it. There are certain points continually broached by the author and they are that 1) the trial was a foregone conclusion and the manner in which it was conducted never addressed the principal charges 2) Eichmann was at no time much more than a glorified clerk (nowhere more evident than in his role at the wanasee conference) 3) Eichmann never killed anyone 4) the trial raised questions of humanity, not just of Eichmann or Germany or the SS or the Holocaust 5) was Israel the apropriate place for this trial?
What seems to have created the controversy was mostly the study of Eichmann that Arendt made (point 2). Eichmann continually stressed that he was not a 'Jew-hater', in fact he reports repeatedly of his contact with and respect for the Zionists. In fact, Eichmann also stresses that he never killed anyone nor was he ever capable of it.
So what is Arendt saying? well, she is actually just making a report, not really a judgement. She never suggests for a moment that Eichmann is not guilty of some definition of crimes against humanity - he shipped hundreds of thousands of Jews to their deaths. But what of the machine of government? Actually, she is not telling us that we might have been Eichmann under the same circumstances and she is not justifying his behaviour thus. There is no contention that his defence of 'i followed orders' is in anyway suitable to explain his crimes. But, Eichmann is no monster and that's not what people want to hear about the so-called 'architect of the Final Solution'.
The wider question of whether or not the court of an individual country can, or should, judge crimes against humanity in general is not one she particularly cares to answer, but i think history has done that for her.
An excellent, disturbing and utterly stimulating read for any student of WWII and/or the Holocaust.
What seems to have created the controversy was mostly the study of Eichmann that Arendt made (point 2). Eichmann continually stressed that he was not a 'Jew-hater', in fact he reports repeatedly of his contact with and respect for the Zionists. In fact, Eichmann also stresses that he never killed anyone nor was he ever capable of it.
So what is Arendt saying? well, she is actually just making a report, not really a judgement. She never suggests for a moment that Eichmann is not guilty of some definition of crimes against humanity - he shipped hundreds of thousands of Jews to their deaths. But what of the machine of government? Actually, she is not telling us that we might have been Eichmann under the same circumstances and she is not justifying his behaviour thus. There is no contention that his defence of 'i followed orders' is in anyway suitable to explain his crimes. But, Eichmann is no monster and that's not what people want to hear about the so-called 'architect of the Final Solution'.
The wider question of whether or not the court of an individual country can, or should, judge crimes against humanity in general is not one she particularly cares to answer, but i think history has done that for her.
An excellent, disturbing and utterly stimulating read for any student of WWII and/or the Holocaust.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:Mass Market Paperback
This book is a key contribution to the debate about the nature of evil and a must-read for anyone making a serious study of responses to the holocaust.
Arendt writes fluidly and you can polish the text off at quite a pace. It is not directly a work of philosophy, even in the sense that the rest of Arendt's work is, but a commentary on the key players in Eichmann's trial and the pertinent historical events, and mostly an analysis of the psychology of Eichmann. It is this psychological study which provokes the most important moral questions, as Eichmann is comes across as a rather stupid, ambitious individual who is sometimes comical in his failure but too complex to be a monster - in fact, too normal for comfort. This is the challenge posed by "the banality of evil": given the right environment and social factors, might there be an Eichmann in all of us?
Arendt writes fluidly and you can polish the text off at quite a pace. It is not directly a work of philosophy, even in the sense that the rest of Arendt's work is, but a commentary on the key players in Eichmann's trial and the pertinent historical events, and mostly an analysis of the psychology of Eichmann. It is this psychological study which provokes the most important moral questions, as Eichmann is comes across as a rather stupid, ambitious individual who is sometimes comical in his failure but too complex to be a monster - in fact, too normal for comfort. This is the challenge posed by "the banality of evil": given the right environment and social factors, might there be an Eichmann in all of us?
Be aware that Arendt has her own social and political axes to grind,and this comes through in her commentary on the trial.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Mass Market Paperback
This book not only picks up major philosophical questions described by other more lerned reviewers but contains well researched facts and information about the second world war, the "jewish question" and how the "final solution" evolved. This book is readable by anyone and re-readable to find more depth, more questions and provoke more thought. It would work for anyone who wanted a better understanding of what the second world war was all about and who starts from a position of relative ignorance like I did.
If you have only seen movies of fighting and heroism, read this book, read this contextual history with chronology. This is both history and the human condition, with "evil" being such a well used word now this will help anyone question is nature.
If you have only seen movies of fighting and heroism, read this book, read this contextual history with chronology. This is both history and the human condition, with "evil" being such a well used word now this will help anyone question is nature.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The dangers of blind obedience.
Hannah Arendt's book is an eye opener. If you think you know all there is to know about the Holocaust and the men who made it happen, read this book. Read more
Published 2 months ago by George
Shocking story told with an objective voice
What is perhaps most striking about the way that the story of Eichman is told is the insensitivity with which he is treated by Arendt. Read more
Published on 9 Nov 2003 by Anders Rasmussen
A Chillingly Believable study
Hannah Arendt's interpretation of the Eichmann trial is a chilling investigation of what she calls 'the banality of evil. Read more
Published on 30 Aug 2002 by MR ROBERT P FOOT
Proves the ordinary banality of evil
This book helps to show how an ordinary man becomes a functionary of evil. The book follows the life of Eichmann through the evidence and events of his trial. Read more
Published on 27 April 2002 by J. E. Parry
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Business, Finance & Law > Law
- Books > History > Countries & Regions > Asia > Middle East > Israel
- Books > History > Europe > Holocaust
- Books > History > Military History > War Crimes > Genocide
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Judaism > History & Culture
- Books > Society, Politics & Philosophy > Philosophy
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
