David Cesarani succeeds excellently in doing 3 things in his book and in the process revises the whole Eichmann story for the 21st century:
1. Updating the life of Eichmann and his deeds from how it was incorrectly presented in his trial in 1961 both by Eichmann and the Prosecution from all subsequent Holocaust historical research and denoting the key differences.
2. Destroying how others tried to interpret his actions plus apply them to the Cold War era of totalitarianism that existed at the time of his trial. His skewering of Hannah Arendt's poor academic research and biased arguments in her book on the trial, which ironically had a more major impact than the trial itself, is worth the price of entry.
3. Finally and most revealingly, showing how close Israel came to screwing it all up. These range from the farces of his capture (only made possible by West German provided information) and execution, to a politically influenced and ill prepared prosecution team that almost blew the case but was ultimately rescued by the integrity and objectivity of the three trial judges.
The one abiding impression gained is that rather than the plea made at his trial of only obeying orders, Eichmann was very much a product of his times and his actions reflected his exposure to the events and his acceptance of the consequences. His upbringing easily led him to deem it right to serve the Nazi party and its policies both morally and as a career opportunity. His real value was as a super administrator (though not quite as desk bound as some portray him still) without whom many of his superiors' decisions would never have had such drastic impact or results. Fully aware of the killings occurring (having witnessed them at first hand) his actions across the period 1941 to 1945 are shown to prove his personal accountability for all his subsequent deeds.