When I was looking for a worthy successor to Karabel and Halsey's rather badly dated Power and Ideology in Education, I found Halsey et al.'s Education, Culture, Economy, Society. I have adopted it as a basic text, along with four or five monographs, for a course in the sociology of education for master's students from a broad range of disciplines. Almost all of them are from majors outside the social sciences, such as nursing, journalism, dietetics, exercise science, and athletic administration. As a result, they are unfamiliar with the issues discussed in the Halsey et al. reader, and find the material moderately difficult.
I do not use the entire text, but select sections that deal with the demise of the Era of the Social Contract, the dominance of contextual factors over education as an institution, and limitations on what can be accomplished through investment in education. For the most part, students find these sections counter-intuitive, but upon reflection they help them make sense of their circumstances, especially why investments in education are not paying off as well as they once did. School-bashers are disabused of misleading conventional wisdom as to the putative decline of public education, and students become less inclined to blame themselves for not quite measuring up to the level they had expected. The chapter by Levin and Kelly titled Can Education Do it Alone? is especially useful.
Along the way, we manage to debunk the myth of meritocracy; contextualize and thereby render thoroughly dubious James Coleman's influential article Social Capital in the Pursuit of Human Capital; and we come to grips with the distinction between class conflict and status group conflict, learning to recognize the latter and understand its consequences.
In my view, this is a lot to accomplish in one course for students unschooled in the social sciences, and the Halsey reader is a valuable instructional tool in this process. However, the book covers such a broad range of disparate issues in education that the focus we found was of our own making. Thanks to Halsey and his colleagues for the needed material, by all means. But a bit more thematic coherence in the selection of work to be included and topics to be addressed would have been useful.