I previously wrote this:
"The target audience for this book appears to be those who are not habitual thinkers who, additionally, require every logical contingency spelt out in a steady, slow, predictable pace with frequent reiterations and references to what has and will be narrated. Care seems to have been taken to deliver a smooth consistent tone that matches the rhythmic predictability. With respect to intuition, consideration is mostly given to the broad definition, without burdening the reader with details on processes."
Maybe it was the dust-jacket. I bought and read this book hoping it was going to shed some generous insight. In retrospect, I think the lack of significant insights conveyed (to me) might be because I've reached a reasonably 'advanced' stage with the subject. However, if an author writes a 'thinking out aloud' book, there is still the devil called the media and publishing that sit between him and a reader. An author following such an approach shouldn't leave it to the middle of the book before announcing that his purpose in writing the book is to explore the subject. The lie of the dust-jacket is that the author has grasped significant insights and delivers them in well-bound form.