I've been wondering for years about the lack of Eastern European art in UK commentaries, histories and galleries of 'European' art. I bought this niche publication accordingly, and wasn't disappointed in the least. It's full of stuff to learn about.
A recent review (Guardian, 24 Sep) on the 'Treasures from Budapest' exhibition at the Royal Academy concludes: "Hungarian collectors [...] bought some supreme Italian works...you see those paragons alongside carved wooden saints from Hungarian churches in a way that expands your sense of the variety and greatness of the continent's heritage."
Antedating the lines above by some years, 'East European Art' (C 2006) in fact focuses on that very sense of variety and greatness, only in far more depth than a newspaper article could allow, quite understandably. The information and arguments are very clearly organized in the book, underpinned by an obvious copiousness and thoroughness of research. The author uses the region's political background as a main thread, which provides a useful perspective to introduced trends and artworks. Without understanding the political/social context much art could be misinterpreted (and probably is, too, in general) and without an emphatic main thread there could be a danger of getting lost in details. The reader is saved from both by recurrent analyses of the trend-defining influence of the Habsburg-Romanov imperial dichotomy, which characterised the region throughout the centuries covered.
It's worth noting that by no means can a 200-odd-page volume cover this vast topic comprehensively. Thus there's no intention to list or introduce all possible artists of acclaim from the region. Quite contrarily, the book aims at identifying major directions, which are then illustarted by a few archetypes. Artwork reproductions in full colour are well provided throughout.