Sherlock Holmes once again tackles the mystery of Jack the Ripper in Lyndsay Faye's 2009 debut novel Dust and Shadow: An Account of the Ripper Killings by Dr. John H. Watson. The potential for a fictional face-off between literature's master detective and the most infamous murderer in British criminal history has, over the last few decades, been the basis for at least two movies and literally dozens of novels and short stories. Though the premise was in serious danger of being over-used, it is fair to say that Faye's belated addition to the list of `Holmes vs. the Ripper' fiction is generally superior to most of the previous efforts, and succeeds in giving the reader a fresh (if perhaps a little too coy and cosy) take on the old story.
Faye's novel isn't a perfect approximation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's writing style (despite the reviews on the back of the book claiming the contrary), but it is probably as close as we are likely to get in 2009. As is usual with these latter-day Holmes pastiches, the main stumbling block of the book is the portrayal of the central characters themselves. In characterising the Great Detective as a quick-thinking, good humoured, and essentially very likeable man of action, Faye critically misses Holmes' mercurial eccentricities and (admittedly politically incorrect) misogynist streak, and whilst Watson remains the dogged, canny narrative voice familiar from Conan Doyle's originals, he is allowed a couple of emotionally charged outbursts that don't ring true. However, Faye largely avoids the kind of tedious, ill-advised attempts to modernise the characters that have blighted so many contemporary Holmes novels (no Alan Vanneman-style amorous encounters for Watson here, at any rate). The writer's research into the Whitechapel murders of 1888 was clearly thorough, and she carefully weaves fact with fiction to intermingle the world of Conan Doyle with the historical details of the still officially unsolved Ripper killings. And though the set-up and execution of the story are clearly the work of a contemporary writer (with such themes as the mercenary nature of the tabloid press playing a dominant part, not to mention a very prominent role for a gutsy and independent-minded female character, and a couple of very un-Doyle swear words thrown in for good measure), Faye admirably avoids sensationalising the Ripper mystery, instead presenting the reader with a somewhat mundane and prosaic, though ultimately quite realistic, solution to the murders (again, this comes as a relief after far too many pieces of Ripper fiction insisting on the involvement of the British Royal Family or a massive Government conspiracy as the key to the mystery).
Despite the rather odd dating of Watson's foreword as 1939 (over fifty years after the case itself, and by which time the good doctor would have been well into his eighties, it contradicts the generally accepted notion that he actually 'died' around a decade earlier), this novel has no need for either the tedious revisionism, nor the obsession with internal chronology that usually blight modern attempts to tell this kind of story. Dust and Shadow isn't a perfect book, but it is an atmospheric and fairly suspenseful one, and for Sherlock Holmes fanatics is well worth a look.