Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Durkheim and the Birth of Economic Sociology [Hardcover]

Philippe Steiner , Keith Tribe

RRP: £37.95
Price: £36.33 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details
You Save: £1.62 (4%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Want it tomorrow, 18 Sep.? Choose Express delivery at checkout. Details

Book Description

12 Dec 2010

émile Durkheim's work has traditionally been viewed as a part of sociology removed from economics. Rectifying this perception, Durkheim and the Birth of Economic Sociology is the first book to provide an in-depth look at the contributions made to economic sociology by Durkheim and his followers. Philippe Steiner demonstrates the relevance of economic factors to sociology and shows how the Durkheimians inform today's economic systems.

Steiner argues that there are two stages in Durkheim's approach to the economy--a sociological critique of political economy and a sociology of economic knowledge. In his early works, Durkheim critiques economists and their categories, and tries to analyze the division of labor from a social rather than economic perspective. From the mid-1890s onward, Durkheim's preoccupations shifted to questions of religion and the sociology of knowledge. Durkheim's disciples, such as Maurice Halbwachs and François Simiand, synthesized and elaborated on Durkheim's first-stage arguments, while his ideas on religion and the economy were taken up by Marcel Mauss. Steiner indicates that the ways in which the Durkheimians rooted the sociology of economic knowledge in the educational system allows for an invaluable perspective on the role of economics in modern society, similar to the perspective offered by Max Weber's work.

Recognizing the power of the Durkheimian approach, Durkheim and the Birth of Economic Sociology assesses the effect of this important thinker and his successors on one of the most active fields in contemporary sociology.

Product details

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


"In this intriguing, informative book, Steiner traces the development of Durkheim's economic sociology. He reveals multiple aspects of Durkheim's theoretical program and successfully demonstrates that Durkheim did not avoid economic analysts but rather shunned reductive analysis by constructing a holistic approach to economics, religion, and knowledge."--Choice

"Durkheim argued that modern industrial society led to the dissolution of the social bonds that render life meaningful. . . . Steiner develops this theme quite nicely, although with a degree of detail that will be of interest only to the historian and perhaps the philosopher."--Herbert Gintis, Economic Record

From the Inside Flap

"A very well-documented book in the history of sociology which demonstrates the relevance of the Durkheimian sociological perspective for the understanding of the crisis of contemporary societies."--Marcel Fournier, Université de Montréal

"This is a first-rate study, scholarly and accessible, revealing a whole dimension of Durkheim's thought hitherto widely unrecognized, focusing on the role of social representations in economic behavior. Steiner lucidly expounds Durkheim's economic sociology and its development by Mauss, Halbwachs, and Simiand, and persuasively argues for its continuing relevance today."--Steven Lukes, New York University

"The scholarship in this book is extremely impressive. Steiner's arguments testify to his enormously detailed and creative reading of Durkheim and the Durkheimians. No other book exists on Durkheimian economic sociology, and I was impressed and delighted by this book's erudition and argument."--Richard Swedberg, Cornell University

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.0 out of 5 stars  1 review
4.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating Historical Account, though Imbellished 16 Sep 2011
By Herbert Gintis - Published on Amazon.com
An insightful entry in Wikipedia notes that economic sociology, which studies the social causes and effects of economic activity, can be broadly into a classical and a contemporary period. The classical period¸ lasting from the Industrial Revolution in Europe to the mid-1980's, was concerned particularly with the effects of the rise of modern capitalism, including the passage from "community" to "market" organization of social relations, from rural to urban life, the rise of secularism, and the transformation of social stratification. Sociology as a discipline arose primarily as a reaction to the rise of capitalism, and unlike Karl Marx and his followers, was generally accepting of the new social order but critical of the unbridled action of market institutions and the industrial proletariat on social life. Economics tended to be less critical of the new social order, with the institutional and historical schools more or less siding with the sociologists, while the "political economists" who employed mathematical techniques and evolved from Adam Smith, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Baptiste Say and the other classical economists, tended not so much approve of the social transformations initiated by industrial capitalism as to simply ignore them. Max Weber's work on the links between economics and religion, in particular the role of Protestantism in fostering modern capitalist entrepreneurship, are the high points of this period of economic sociology.

Contemporary economic sociology was inspired by the "embeddedness" approach outlined by of Mark Granovetter in 1985. Granovetter stressed that exchange relations almost always take place within a complex network of substantive social relations. Granovetter's theory of "weak ties" and Ronald Burt's theory of "structural holes" are salient products of this second wave of contributions to economic sociology.

Economic sociology in both periods has been generally hostile to analytical economic theory (called "political economy" in the early years). In the modern period this probably is due to the fact that economics is more mathematically sophisticated than sociological theory, and it is unclear to many that the increased sophistication has any payoff in terms of improved understanding of the economy. Moreover, economists consistently and completely ignored sociological theory until very recently, and sociologists responded by offering frequent and vitriolic attacks suggesting that the analytical economic approach was wrong-headed. These attacks, are to this observer rarely coherent or interesting. It is certainly true that economic models would be significantly enriched by paying closer attention to sociological phenomena, but it is not plausible that the basic economic models, stemming from the rational actor model, game theory, and market analysis, should simply be abandoned.

Indeed, in recent years, major economic researchers, including Nobel prize recipients Herbert Simon, Douglas North and George Akerlof, and influential economists including Jeffery Sachs and Avner Greif, have directly incorporated sociological insights into their models. The rise of behavioral game theory and experimental economics has also rendered the lines between economic and sociological analysis rather difficult to define (see my Bounds of Reason, 2009 and my book with Samuel Bowles, A Cooperative Species, 2011).

The book under review relates only to the first wave in economic sociology, inspecting the reaction of Emile Durkheim and his followers to the political economy of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Durkheim is of special importance because is, along with Max Weber, one of the cornerstones of modern sociological theory. However, unlike Weber, Durkheim's most important work and ideas do not intersect with economic theory at all, and Durkheim turned away from economics altogether in his later years. For this reason, only the first two chapters of this book deal with Durkheim's personal views, the remainder dealing with his followers in the first third of the twentieth century. While these views are of more than a little historical interest, they will have limited importance for the casual reader. The title is thus a bit misleading, as most of his analysis does not related to Durkheim at all, and it would be a mistake to attribute all of the ideas of his students to the master himself.

Emile Durkheim, the formative sociological thinker, and Leon Walras, the equally formative economic thinker, appear to have ignored each other rather completely, and economists of the time had no systematic means of discussing the effects of the growth of markets on social life in general. Durkheim's major starting point in the critique of political economy is that social cohesion is based on notions of fairness and justice, while the unregulated growth of capitalism undercuts morality by determining prices purely through unregulated markets. Indeed, Durkheim's picture of capitalism is little different from Marx's as expressed in the Communist Manifesto, where we learn that "the bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It ... has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest ... for exploitation veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation ... Constant revolutionizing of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones ... All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses, his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind."

Durkheim could not match Marx's brilliance, but he was no less convinced of the truth of the message. Unlike Marx, of course Durkheim more or less accepted the class relations devolving from the Industrial Revolution, but he fervently believed that industrial society need new "professional groups" that could regulate capitalist growth in a way that promoted the legitimacy of the economic system and the justice of its division of labor and distribution of wealth. This led him to a bitter attack on political economy because it generally had no concept of justice whatever, and those economists that discussed normative issues tended to rely on the marginal productivity principle to determine when the terms of exchange were just. Durkheim had no sympathy with this notion, and he rejected both the market determination of wage rates and the justice of wealth inheritance.

In short, Durkheim argued that modern industrial society led to the dissolution of the social bonds that render life meaningful. The result is "anomie," which leads to mental illness, indicative of which is the high rate of suicide in modern society. Steiner develops this theme quite nicely, although with a degree of detail that will be of interest only to the historian and perhaps the philosopher.
Was this review helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category