For some reason, Amazon doesn't like what I have to say about this book because this is the 3rd attempt at trying to get my opinion through.
In short, it was horrible. How horrible? This book was like a recipe. Combine 1 alphole hero & 1 stupid, fluttering heroine, combine with a liberal amount of grammatical atrocities like "drawled mockingly" "whispered frowningly" "grated harshly" "sighed breathlessly" "bit out snappily" etc etc ad nauseatingly, and set to a slow bake for 280 pages. DON'T WATCH IT COOK. YOU WILL DIE OF BOREDOM.
All snark aside, this book was a colossal bore and epic fail as romance, Regency genre, AND good writing. The only way it could conceivably be called "Regency" is that there's a duke and the "ton" is referred to several times. Otherwise, the hero & heroine could have been a Sicilian tycoon and an experienced virgin pregnant mistress stable bride.
I know the author is prolific (though I have never read any of her contemporaries), and perhaps the pedestrian and sloppy prose is a result of such high output, but it is very depressing to think that some good manuscripts were rejected by Harlequin and Mortimer's dabble in the historical genre was automatically accepted because of her "house author" status.
This was my first Mortimer and unless some judge decides to be totally perverse and mandate another book of hers as a means of my execution, it will be my last.
ETA: As for the negative votes I'm getting, if you would be so kind as to comment & tell me why, it would be greatly appreciated! If you've read the book & disagree with my assessment, it would be awesome if you could quote some excerpts to counter my opinion with how extremely well-written this book was. :-)