I really enjoyed this book. Pascoe does a good job providing a detailed description of masculinity within a variety of social settings at Riverton High School. Unfortunately, she spends more time on specific spaces (such as auto-shop) and certain groups of students (like the Basketball Girls), than on the school as a whole. I wonder if she would have gotten slightly different results had she focused on more generic spaces such as 'the classroom'. Still, Pascoe does a great job explaining how masculinity is at work in these settings. Some of her explanations go against what the students said, which makes some of her claims somewhat suspicious, though I found most of her arguments in these cases convincing. I particularly appreciated Pascoe's use of Butler's idea of the specter, which she applied to the term/identity/idea of 'the fag'. I applaud Pascoe for including race analysis in this work, though it is only a minor part and doesn't go into great depth, I still think she used it well.
My big complaint about this book is that there isn't anything amazing in her conclusion. I was so happy to see that she included both 'theoretical implications' and 'practical' implications. However, her suggestions in the conclusion were not ground-breaking.
Finally, Pascoe extends 'the fag discourse' further than I would have expected. She includes not only times when students explicity say 'fag' as discourse, but also times when these students (male) imitate effeminate behavior. While I think it was appropriate to do so, I was disappointed in her lack of ability to see the radical potential in the effeminate imitations. She chalked up these imitations to be purely anti-fag. Perhaps in the situations she saw it was such, but I have seen situations in which these imitations have been part of the 'deep play' she ends up suggesting would help break the sexism and heterosexism/homophobia so rampant in American high schools today. Yet, she didn't make the connection between the two.