or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
More Buying Choices
25 used & new from £6.12

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments
 
 

The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments (Hardcover)

by Julian Baggini (Author)
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
RRP: £12.99
Price: £9.09 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save: £3.90 (30%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Want guaranteed delivery by Wednesday, November 25? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details
21 new from £6.12 4 used from £6.46
12 Days of Christmas Sale in Books
Get up to 65% off some of our top titles. Shop now

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Frequently Bought Together

The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments + The Pig That Wants to be Eaten: And Ninety-nine Other Thought Experiments + Do You Think What You Think You Think?
Price For All Three: £20.54

Show availability and delivery details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

The Pig That Wants to be Eaten: And Ninety-nine Other Thought Experiments

The Pig That Wants to be Eaten: And Ninety-nine Other Thought Experiments

by Julian Baggini
4.0 out of 5 stars (17)  £6.26
Do You Think What You Think You Think?

Do You Think What You Think You Think?

by Julian Baggini
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  £5.19
Don't Get Fooled Again: A Sceptic's Handbook: The Sceptic's Guide to Life

Don't Get Fooled Again: A Sceptic's Handbook: The Sceptic's Guide to Life

by Richard Wilson
4.2 out of 5 stars (5)  £6.99
Making Sense: Philosophy Behind the Headlines

Making Sense: Philosophy Behind the Headlines

by Julian Baggini
5.0 out of 5 stars (3)  £9.09
Should You Judge This Book by Its Cover?: 100 Fresh Takes on Familiar Sayings and Quotations

Should You Judge This Book by Its Cover?: 100 Fresh Takes on Familiar Sayings and Quotations

by Julian Baggini
£7.14
Explore similar items

Product details

  • Hardcover: 224 pages
  • Publisher: Granta Books (1 Sep 2008)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 184708043X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1847080431
  • Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.4 x 3.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 44,657 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Product Description

Review

'A curiosity cabinet of spurious reasoning and spin ... Every society needs its guardian of good sense: Baggini is ours' --Financial Times


Review

'A book to treasure for Baggini's never-miss lucidity'

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 
talking pig
spin doctors
skepticism
rtfm
philosophy
lucky duck
julian baggini

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?


 

Customer Reviews

4 Reviews
5 star:
 (2)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.2 out of 5 stars (4 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The book that won the argument, 30 Dec 2008
By Mr. J. Christopher "Jim C" (Woodbridge, Suffolk) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I am a firm fan of Baggini's previous works, but I have to say this is my favourite and in my view his best. I have been aware of some of the most common tricks used in arguments, but this book helps to clarify and contextualise the sleights of hand often used either knowingly or unwittingly by those trying to convince us. The chapters are short and punchy and I continually found myself thinking 'oh go on then...one more chapter and then put it down'. The only warning I would issue is that if you wish to retain healthy relationships with friends and loved ones, avoid shouting 'false dichotomy!' or 'post-hoc fallacy!' whilst watching the news or reading the newspaper. Perhaps a knowing smile, or a wry shake of the head will suffice...
Overall, an uncommon combination: an accessible book, but one that makes the reader feel genuinely 'educated' after dipping into it.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Book of the Year, 23 Dec 2008
In the 'The Duck that won the Lottery', 100 different logical fallacies are explained clearly and concisely. Each fallacy is initially presented by giving a well known argument that contains it, then the fallacy is explained and then a more subtle argument that may or may not contain the fallacy is provided. The clear objective is to make the reader think.

There are four reasons why I really like this book:
1.
By using simple but relevant examples to explain each fallacy, Baggini makes things easy to read and easy to understand. For example, not everyone knows what a false dichotomy is, even though many of us thought Bush's infamous: "You are either with us or the terrorists" sounded a bit dodgy.

By using this approach something esoteric becomes non - esoteric.

2.
After presenting an obvious example that contains a fallacy, he presents another argument which may or may not contain the very same fallacy. Things aren't as obvious and a bit more thought is required.

The intent here is obviously to make the reader question their own opinions. Yes it's easy, to pick other people's arguments apart but the chances are many of our own are a bit faulty. We may just have to think a bit more to realise that.

3.
After several well known arguments are shown to be just more examples of sloppy thinking, there is a subtle reminder that bad logic is just ubiquitous. Most arguments are poorly thought out and contain not much more than catchy rhetoric. This is remarkable considering the origins of logic go back over 2,500 to Aristotle et al and we are still struggling to come up to speed with it.

4.
Have you ever heard an argument which you think didn't make sense but you just couldn't explain exactly what was wrong with it? This book would definitely razor sharpen your ability to pick a hole in any argument. But that said, an over indulgence in this pastime may quickly loose friends as the reality is very few opinions are logical. There's usually a subjective assumption or a leap of logic between premise and conclusion.

All that said, I have read five of Baggini's books now. They are usually excellent - this book, no exception. In fact, it's probably his best yet. I would even go so far as to say it's my favourite book of 2008.










Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Good, but not deep, 2 April 2009
By C. Lloyd - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
If you are looking for an in-depth look at rhetorical methods then look elsewhere. This is light, fluffy reading and those with more than average awareness will find little to chew on. That said it does make for a quick read and makes plenty of valid points, albeit often pretty obvious ones. If you read the media without looking behind the language then you should be read this or something similar. The only problem of course is that the book is really designed for those who would not read a book on the subject. Catch 22. The tone is a trifle inconsistent, veering between chatty to more measured and, sorry to say, includes some hideous modern office-style slang, which will date terribly. He is also obviously trying hard to be fair to everybody, admirable but not always entertaining. The best joke: sweeping statements are always wrong. Nice. It reads as if the author is holding back and only really comes alive when he starts bringing out the big guns and pointing out the philosophic arguments that underpin the destruction of the fallacies and takes a proper swing at something. The book itself suffers from amateur-looking typesetting (including huge leading), poor fonts and could certainly have done with a better editor to weed out the occasionally bizarre word choices. Good, but not what it could have been. Next time please let go a little.
Comment Comment (1) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars A light introduction to logic
Maybe it's not very profound, but I appreciated his factual approach to the ways of bad reasoning and how to avoid them Sometimes obvious, sometimes pointing out unthought-of... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Ventura Angelo

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject







i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback

Ad

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.