Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments [Hardcover]

Julian Baggini
4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  


Product details

  • Hardcover: 224 pages
  • Publisher: Granta Books (1 Sep 2008)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 184708043X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1847080431
  • Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.4 x 3.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 311,919 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Julian Baggini
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Visit Amazon's Julian Baggini Page

Product Description

Review

'A curiosity cabinet of spurious reasoning and spin ... Every society needs its guardian of good sense: Baggini is ours' --Financial Times

Review

'A book to treasure for Baggini's never-miss lucidity'

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more


 

Customer Reviews

7 Reviews
5 star:
 (3)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.1 out of 5 stars (7 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Good, but not deep, 2 April 2009
By 
C. Lloyd - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments (Hardcover)
If you are looking for an in-depth look at rhetorical methods then look elsewhere. This is light, fluffy reading and those with more than average awareness will find little to chew on. That said it does make for a quick read and makes plenty of valid points, albeit often pretty obvious ones. If you read the media without looking behind the language then you should be read this or something similar. The only problem of course is that the book is really designed for those who would not read a book on the subject. Catch 22. The tone is a trifle inconsistent, veering between chatty to more measured and, sorry to say, includes some hideous modern office-style slang, which will date terribly. He is also obviously trying hard to be fair to everybody, admirable but not always entertaining. The best joke: sweeping statements are always wrong. Nice. It reads as if the author is holding back and only really comes alive when he starts bringing out the big guns and pointing out the philosophic arguments that underpin the destruction of the fallacies and takes a proper swing at something. The book itself suffers from amateur-looking typesetting (including huge leading), poor fonts and could certainly have done with a better editor to weed out the occasionally bizarre word choices. Good, but not what it could have been. Next time please let go a little.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The book that won the argument, 30 Dec 2008
By 
Mr. J. Christopher "Jim C" (Woodbridge, Suffolk) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments (Hardcover)
I am a firm fan of Baggini's previous works, but I have to say this is my favourite and in my view his best. I have been aware of some of the most common tricks used in arguments, but this book helps to clarify and contextualise the sleights of hand often used either knowingly or unwittingly by those trying to convince us. The chapters are short and punchy and I continually found myself thinking 'oh go on then...one more chapter and then put it down'. The only warning I would issue is that if you wish to retain healthy relationships with friends and loved ones, avoid shouting 'false dichotomy!' or 'post-hoc fallacy!' whilst watching the news or reading the newspaper. Perhaps a knowing smile, or a wry shake of the head will suffice...
Overall, an uncommon combination: an accessible book, but one that makes the reader feel genuinely 'educated' after dipping into it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Book of the Year, 23 Dec 2008
This review is from: The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments (Hardcover)
In the 'The Duck that won the Lottery', 100 different logical fallacies are explained clearly and concisely. Each fallacy is initially presented by giving a well known argument that contains it, then the fallacy is explained and then a more subtle argument that may or may not contain the fallacy is provided. The clear objective is to make the reader think.

There are four reasons why I really like this book:
1.
By using simple but relevant examples to explain each fallacy, Baggini makes things easy to read and easy to understand. For example, not everyone knows what a false dichotomy is, even though many of us thought Bush's infamous: "You are either with us or the terrorists" sounded a bit dodgy.

By using this approach something esoteric becomes non - esoteric.

2.
After presenting an obvious example that contains a fallacy, he presents another argument which may or may not contain the very same fallacy. Things aren't as obvious and a bit more thought is required.

The intent here is obviously to make the reader question their own opinions. Yes it's easy, to pick other people's arguments apart but the chances are many of our own are a bit faulty. We may just have to think a bit more to realise that.

3.
After several well known arguments are shown to be just more examples of sloppy thinking, there is a subtle reminder that bad logic is just ubiquitous. Most arguments are poorly thought out and contain not much more than catchy rhetoric. This is remarkable considering the origins of logic go back over 2,500 to Aristotle et al and we are still struggling to come up to speed with it.

4.
Have you ever heard an argument which you think didn't make sense but you just couldn't explain exactly what was wrong with it? This book would definitely razor sharpen your ability to pick a hole in any argument. But that said, an over indulgence in this pastime may quickly loose friends as the reality is very few opinions are logical. There's usually a subjective assumption or a leap of logic between premise and conclusion.

All that said, I have read five of Baggini's books now. They are usually excellent - this book, no exception. In fact, it's probably his best yet. I would even go so far as to say it's my favourite book of 2008.










Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
 Go to Amazon.com to see all 22 reviews  3.8 out of 5 stars 
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews





Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject







i.e., each product must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Feedback