- Hardcover: 456 pages
- Publisher: William Morrow & Co (Feb 1991)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0688088198
- ISBN-13: 978-0688088194
- Product Dimensions: 24.1 x 16.5 x 5.1 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 825,302 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
Another roiling brew of history, poppycock, and fantasy from the Irish Marion Zimmer Bradley. This novel, however, differs from previous Llywelyn offerings (e.g., Grania and The Lion of Ireland) in that it's not set in Ireland. Instead, Free Gaul is its locale, also known as Hairy Gaul by the ethnocentric Romans sniffing around its borders in search of territories to win and barbarians to enslave. But the druid chieftain, Ainvar - a very civilized chap, rumored to be able to bring the dead back to life, and marked at birth as "he who travels far" - figures out what Gaius Julius Caesar and his legions are up to right away. As he sees it, Caesar's out to divide and conquer Gaul. So Ainvar joins forces with his boyhood friend, Vercingetorix, to unite the perpetually squabbling Gaulish tribes - an effort that results in one or two valiant barbarian victories, followed by a smashing Final defeat at the stronghold of Alesia. Poor Vercingetorix gets taken to Rome to be paraded before the Senate, while Ainvar makes it back to his sacred grove in time to stop his beloved wife, Briga, from sacrificing herself to the Otherworld. With Rome's sway established, Druidism is outlawed, leaving Ainvar to roam the dark forests of proto-France with his clan, preserving the old ways as best he can. Llywelyn's handling of all the schoolbook-history is less preposterous than usual (despite hefty doses of druidical theology), and her basic idea - dramatizing Caesar's conquest of Gaul from Gaulish eyes - is sound enough to attract her regulars, as well as foraging New Agers. (Kirkus Reviews)
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Description
A novel set against the background of Julius Caesar's invasion of Gaul. It tells the story of Ainvar, possessor of mystical powers, who has the vision and genius to save his Celtic people from total destruction. The author's other novels include "Lion of Ireland" and "On Raven's Wing".
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
I AWOKE TO terror because I heard them singing. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt
I AWOKE TO terror because I heard them singing. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Mass Market Paperback
I thought this may have been a little slow to start but, I got into it fairly quickly. I enjoyed the character of Ainvar although he becomes chief druid he is a very likeable person, could really warm to. I found halfway through the book lacked a little and lost a little interest so took me a while longer to read than would normally do, but, towards arounds page 180 it picked up and really started to enjoy it. Not only a really good fiction novel but, a good insight into the way of Druids. Would really recommend this book. I haven't seen the film as have been told it isn't really anywhere near as good as the book, but, I think films rarely are...
7 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I don't know quite enough about the historical perspective to be able to make a judgement about historical accuracy in this book. It is important to bear that in mind when reading this review. On the other hand, besides being an avid reader, I have a degree in literature so, that is something I'm capable of judging.
Druids tells us the story of Vercigentorix and the Gaul's fight against the Roman dominion, told by the lead druid of Vercigentorix's tribe. The intricate politics (if you can call it that) of the different gaulish tribes and Vercigentorix's attempt to unite them are extremely well depicted.
It is a very well written novel that has its main strength in Morgan's ability to build a story around its characters. The personal side to the story is very well documented throughout and the reader is lead to a point where you feel the characters' pains. What I find particularly interesting is the fact that, although we are hoping that the weeker side, as usual, wins, Morgan never turns Cesar into a villain. The meeting of Vercingetorix and Cesar is one of two great warriors and generals, who respect each other for their conquists and capability in the field of battle. The accomplishment of this relationship is what, in my view, turns this book into something quite special. Read it and see for yourselves, but please, for all that's holy in this life, DON'T see the film!
Druids tells us the story of Vercigentorix and the Gaul's fight against the Roman dominion, told by the lead druid of Vercigentorix's tribe. The intricate politics (if you can call it that) of the different gaulish tribes and Vercigentorix's attempt to unite them are extremely well depicted.
It is a very well written novel that has its main strength in Morgan's ability to build a story around its characters. The personal side to the story is very well documented throughout and the reader is lead to a point where you feel the characters' pains. What I find particularly interesting is the fact that, although we are hoping that the weeker side, as usual, wins, Morgan never turns Cesar into a villain. The meeting of Vercingetorix and Cesar is one of two great warriors and generals, who respect each other for their conquists and capability in the field of battle. The accomplishment of this relationship is what, in my view, turns this book into something quite special. Read it and see for yourselves, but please, for all that's holy in this life, DON'T see the film!
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
60 reviews
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Captivating historical tale
28 Jan 2005
Format:Mass Market Paperback
At the end of this book, Llewelyn includes a brief bibliography-- complete with ancient sources as well as contemporary accounts-- and the attention to detail shows in the book.
It's really a treat to read a book about Druids that lacks the new-agey stonehenge-reverent "true religion" tone-- these Druids are the healers/holy people of the Celts, but they are also just people, they marry, have children, etc. They do work magic but it's more to do with perception than transformation.
The story follows young Ainvar from his intrusion into a sacrifice (which is also not what it seems-- the human sacrifices come willingly, and drink a tonic the night before, so that the knife is just a ritual) to bring spring on-- his adoption by the aging chief Druid, his "man-making" in which he meets his soul-friend, Rix-- Vercengetorix-- and ultimately his involvement in the dream of forming a great alliance among the Celtic tribes to resist the incursion of Caesar.
If you've ever read or even just had any knowledge of "All Gaul was divided in three parts" you probably know this isn't going to be a huge success for the Gauls. Still, you can't help hoping...
Ainvar is resourceful and likable. At times the elegaic tone for the Celts ("we were a people who sang") is a bit twee, and it's true the Romans are presented as out and out villains which oversimplifies the story. There are also a few loose ends-- a kidnapped daughter's fate and the betrayal by a friend.
But on the whole this is an engrossing story with a sense of historical accuracy, and a must read for anyone interested in Celts and ancient Rome. Llewelyn's prose is a treat and she writes engaging characters throughout.
It's really a treat to read a book about Druids that lacks the new-agey stonehenge-reverent "true religion" tone-- these Druids are the healers/holy people of the Celts, but they are also just people, they marry, have children, etc. They do work magic but it's more to do with perception than transformation.
The story follows young Ainvar from his intrusion into a sacrifice (which is also not what it seems-- the human sacrifices come willingly, and drink a tonic the night before, so that the knife is just a ritual) to bring spring on-- his adoption by the aging chief Druid, his "man-making" in which he meets his soul-friend, Rix-- Vercengetorix-- and ultimately his involvement in the dream of forming a great alliance among the Celtic tribes to resist the incursion of Caesar.
If you've ever read or even just had any knowledge of "All Gaul was divided in three parts" you probably know this isn't going to be a huge success for the Gauls. Still, you can't help hoping...
Ainvar is resourceful and likable. At times the elegaic tone for the Celts ("we were a people who sang") is a bit twee, and it's true the Romans are presented as out and out villains which oversimplifies the story. There are also a few loose ends-- a kidnapped daughter's fate and the betrayal by a friend.
But on the whole this is an engrossing story with a sense of historical accuracy, and a must read for anyone interested in Celts and ancient Rome. Llewelyn's prose is a treat and she writes engaging characters throughout.
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Historical Fiction at its Best
12 Mar 2000
Format:Mass Market Paperback
I have read a number of Morgan's novels, all of which are excellent reads in their own right, however "Druids" is by far the most compelling. It is a wonderful attempt to show history through the eyes of the vanquished, and not the usual creators of history - the victors. As in all her books, the writing is fluid and enthralling. The person to person stories written around the historical events are so well done the reader feels anticipation and hope even though we all know how tragically it all ends. A definate must read for anyone who has an interest in the Celts, history, or simply a well written story.
18 of 21 people found the following review helpful
Defense
2 Oct 2002
Format:Mass Market Paperback
While I do not consider this to be one of the greatest books I've ever read, it certainly is a good one. It has it's flaws, yes. Every book does.
I was a little surprised that Llywelyn actually included human sacrifice in her portrayal of the druids, considering that the only source of "witness" to such practices were the Romans themselves, who, being the enemy of the Gallic Celts, were known to create various lies to plant fear of the druids in the minds of their followers. Note that I am not deducting any stars due to this, though, because there is very little we know about the Celts and their lives and one cannot be absolutely certain.
However, I feel the need to defend this book against some of the reviews, because, frankly, many of them were down-right stupid.
Take, for instance, the reviewer who deducted a star merely because it had a "sad ending". How many books have sad endings? Some of the greatest books of all time do! It has nothing to do with the quality of the book, so don't deduct from the average star review for such a stupid thing as that! He follows up with an "Oh, well, that's history" attitude. So why deduct the star at all?
Oh, and the person who complains about the central character being "egotistical"...So what if he ever showed any signs of egotism? That's his character! Once again, that's a part of the story. And then you spoke of the Romans being "exaggerated". That's because it was from the Gallic Celts' point of view. Of course they're going to portray the Romans that way! It's their point of view! Oh, and if you're going to bash a book, at least use something resembling good English grammar so you don't look like a complete fool. There's a difference between typos and not using anything resembling capitalization, punctuation, etc. When talking about the Romans, use the plural form of the word. "of Roman" does not cut it.
And there was another man who said the characters were too "sophisticated" for him, because the Celts are shrouded in such mystery. You're right, there is much we do not know. But the author has the license to guess. She seems to have done a fairly good job at remaining as historically accurate as possible. What do you want her to do? Have paper-thin, 2-dimensional characters? Come on! She has to breathe life into them somehow! And there is hardly a reason to believe that the Celts didn't have the vocabulary to express concepts such as "professional jealousy."
Sorry for ranting like this, but I'm tired of stupid, trivial reviews complaining about stupid things. Reviews such as "this isn't what I was looking for", so the book itself is terrible because "I was unaware of its true content".
Like I said, this wasn't a perfect book. I give it four stars because I believe it deserves that much for it's fluidity and presentation. It reads pretty well. But it lacks something.
I was a little surprised that Llywelyn actually included human sacrifice in her portrayal of the druids, considering that the only source of "witness" to such practices were the Romans themselves, who, being the enemy of the Gallic Celts, were known to create various lies to plant fear of the druids in the minds of their followers. Note that I am not deducting any stars due to this, though, because there is very little we know about the Celts and their lives and one cannot be absolutely certain.
However, I feel the need to defend this book against some of the reviews, because, frankly, many of them were down-right stupid.
Take, for instance, the reviewer who deducted a star merely because it had a "sad ending". How many books have sad endings? Some of the greatest books of all time do! It has nothing to do with the quality of the book, so don't deduct from the average star review for such a stupid thing as that! He follows up with an "Oh, well, that's history" attitude. So why deduct the star at all?
Oh, and the person who complains about the central character being "egotistical"...So what if he ever showed any signs of egotism? That's his character! Once again, that's a part of the story. And then you spoke of the Romans being "exaggerated". That's because it was from the Gallic Celts' point of view. Of course they're going to portray the Romans that way! It's their point of view! Oh, and if you're going to bash a book, at least use something resembling good English grammar so you don't look like a complete fool. There's a difference between typos and not using anything resembling capitalization, punctuation, etc. When talking about the Romans, use the plural form of the word. "of Roman" does not cut it.
And there was another man who said the characters were too "sophisticated" for him, because the Celts are shrouded in such mystery. You're right, there is much we do not know. But the author has the license to guess. She seems to have done a fairly good job at remaining as historically accurate as possible. What do you want her to do? Have paper-thin, 2-dimensional characters? Come on! She has to breathe life into them somehow! And there is hardly a reason to believe that the Celts didn't have the vocabulary to express concepts such as "professional jealousy."
Sorry for ranting like this, but I'm tired of stupid, trivial reviews complaining about stupid things. Reviews such as "this isn't what I was looking for", so the book itself is terrible because "I was unaware of its true content".
Like I said, this wasn't a perfect book. I give it four stars because I believe it deserves that much for it's fluidity and presentation. It reads pretty well. But it lacks something.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
