I'm a stickler for this review process being about the actual product; people moan about delivery and packaging when they should be reviewing the actual product. So here's an unusual book review prior to even finishing the book and the reason is that books, like everything else, not only have to be readable in terms of their content, story line and grammar, they have to be well made:
This book came highly recommended but I'm still suffering from the disappointment of finding that a book I was looking forward to is printed on junk paper with very faint type which varies in density not only from page to page but across each page. It's also printed in a positively archaeological font so I can tell it's not going to be a joy to read and if I could be arsed and wasn't bothered about the cost to the environment, I'd simply ask Amazon to take it back. Just flicking through it, the illustrations are dreadful. I realise that litho printing uses dots to render images on paper but you're not supposed to be able to distinguish the individual dots at arms length. The author uses several graphs to illustrate his point but on the wole these are unreadable because the different symbols used to identify different species on a scatter grapher are indistinguishable one from the other. The original book was first printed in 1977 and if this is what we had to put up with back then, then I'm surprised anybody read anything. All in all, the print quality is like a fourth generation photocopy shrunk to half size.
Whatever you buy on the internet, you're entitled to expect decent manufacturing quality and this does not offer anything near an acceptable quality. Like at least one other reviewer, I'd recommend you not to buy this paperback item and do as I probably will, seek the hard cover version.