- Actors: Jean Michel Basquiat, John Lurie, Ted Bafaloukos, Tom Baker, Eszter Balint
- Directors: Edo Bertoglio
- Writers: Glenn O'Brien
- Producers: Glenn O'Brien, Maripol, Michael Zilkha, Patrick Montgomery
- Format: PAL
- Region: All Regions
- Number of discs: 1
- Classification: 15
- Studio: Ilc
- DVD Release Date: 2 Sep 2002
- Run Time: 72 minutes
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
- ASIN: B00007JGJA
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 87,239 in Film & TV (See Top 100 in Film & TV)
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Product details |
Reviews
Special Features
Wide Screen
English
Region 0
Dolby Digital English
Dolby Digital
English
Region 0
Dolby Digital English
Dolby Digital
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
an interesting glimpse of the world of the artist Jean Michel Basquiat. Following a pretty poor story line, we are introduced to characters from his world while he provides a voiceover narrative; he encounters fellow artists, musicians, DJs..etc while walking the streets of 80s NYC. Some interesting parallels to his art and artistic life, as it is in essence a film collage of scenes, grafitti art, music and New York in the 1980s. I'm not sure what genre of film it would fit into; although it appears to be basically fictional at least some of it could be a documentary.
There's also an amusingly bizarre appearance from Debbie Harry as some kind of bag-lady/fairy godmother near the end.
There's also an amusingly bizarre appearance from Debbie Harry as some kind of bag-lady/fairy godmother near the end.
Quite pretentious and sometimes bizarre with some horrible experimental jazz music in places, the film can seem a little dated and self ingratiating, but it has at least some artistic merit, and its worth seeing the artist in the flesh so to speak, creating and showing us a glimpse of his scene (although with perhaps rather less drug usage than in reality!)
I quite enjoyed it, but its not everyone's cuppa tea! If you like his work its probably worth seeing.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:VHS Tape
This is an art-film rather than a movie. If you like the work of Basquiat, then you will appreciate it for this reason alone. Some good NY new wave bands and early hip-hop culture. A glimpse of a world now gone for good, nostalgia for those who remember the excesses and creativity of the late 70s/ early 80s.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
21 reviews
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful
A trippy almost surreal peek into the 80s New York art scene
31 Oct 2002
Format:DVD
If you can bypass the bad,out of sync dialogue(It seems the original master audio might have been lost and recreated solely for the re-issue)this is a really good ,dare I say it, art movie. It's a rare treat for anyone to see classic No Wave bands like DNA,Tuxedomoon & James White and the Blacks on film,hands down. And who can ever say even one bad word about the Japanese band the Plastics? My only slight beef with the film was that it sometimes tried to drive the point too much in the premise that "This is New York,baby!!! We're the center of the world!" Also,it vacillated between Basquiat,his syntax art and the bands so often you weren't sure what was the film's true focus. Still,for a 21 year old lost movie(that survived only by the master negative being locked away and forgotten)it's a gem of a period piece. The special appearance by Debbie Harry makes things even more quirky. Very definitely an excellent companion video to the Basquiat biopic.
22 of 23 people found the following review helpful
a bunch of artists glorifying their scene--as they well should.
27 Aug 2005
Format:DVD|Amazon Verified Purchase
If you're expecting a documentary of Basquiat, you will be sorely dissapointed. If you're expecting a movie qua movie, you'll be less dissapointed, but not as much. Downtown 81 is at the very least an art film that happens to feature Basquiat, as well as the "stars" of nyc circa '79. If you have never seen films of this type you are in for a ride. Apropos of this genre, Downtown 81 is ostensibly low budget, quirky, but most of all, historical. Historical not in the sense that it is an important film, but rather historical as a document. Not since Mondo New York have i encountered a film that captures so well the feeling, mood, vibe, and color of this so very interesting period in both the underground of New York, but also the art scene. I would even add that it gives one a glimpse of life in general in what the description on the reverse of the package calls "pre-Giuliani New York"; a very different Manhatten than what we all might expect.
As both a fan of Basquiat and of Schnabel's movie, I would assume the other fans of either or both will find this film quite entertaining. Otherwise, I recommend it for anyone interested in the 80's art scene, the early nyc punk/new wave scene, or those curious about the underbelly of the nyc of this period.
Additionally, what makes this release so interesting and important are the extras, especially the segment from an early cable tv show featuring Basquiat during the SAMO years.
All in all, not a bad bang for the buck, as well as a great addition to any cd collection of one whose curiosity has been piqued by this particular time.
As both a fan of Basquiat and of Schnabel's movie, I would assume the other fans of either or both will find this film quite entertaining. Otherwise, I recommend it for anyone interested in the 80's art scene, the early nyc punk/new wave scene, or those curious about the underbelly of the nyc of this period.
Additionally, what makes this release so interesting and important are the extras, especially the segment from an early cable tv show featuring Basquiat during the SAMO years.
All in all, not a bad bang for the buck, as well as a great addition to any cd collection of one whose curiosity has been piqued by this particular time.
20 of 24 people found the following review helpful
a holy grail film
27 Jan 2005
Format:DVD
Boy, If I was happy when this film came out in New York a few years back.
I believe, the director made the effort to release it, 20 years after it was made, as an alternative to Julian Schnabel's film "basquiat". Back in the New York 80s, there were two type of artistic world. The Soho type, which followed the Andy Warhol's double edge philosophy: "Making money is an art",and the East Village type, which followed the tradition of the Beat poets.
Ofcourse, the legacy Warhol left when he produced the Velvet Underground as an "art form" and also films of conceptual ideas,( 1960s) were not part of the "making money" image of Soho.
This phase in Warhol's career ( before he became really rich) was the source of the east village bohemians, the so called "Children of Andy Warhol",
Those hipsters, were the one producing the art films and punk bands.
Noone was painting in the east village at the time. One was either a film maker or a member in a punk band. Cool art was graffiti, because it was not considered art by the status quo, and that was precisely what the scene of the east village was looking for: anti-art.
It was not so much wealth what we were after, but be part of the pantheon of die-hard hipsters.
Punk musicians were more and more expressing themselves through film. Basquiat was a member of Gray.(a No Wave Band)(NO Wavers was the underground within the underground in those days)
Debby Harry a member of Blondie. It was said at the time that what made Basquiat truly known within that underground was his encounter with Blondie, who got him into the film. IT is true that he was known as Samo, but that was something else.
Why is this film a holy grail? well, se how many films Picasso did about himself; only one Le Mystere Picasso. In Downtown 81 we not only see the legend, we see the neighborhood and the bands. It is an historical documentary. Something that the author himself ( Im sure) never had in mind when filming it. That is the reason why it was lost for so long. They never thought it was important.
That brings to mind the words of Picasso: "Art is stronger than I, because it makes me do what she wants"
They worked on one more punk film, when in fact it was a jewel in the making, something beyond their grasp. They were merely the instruments that help create a documentary that was destined to exist.
I think this film is as important as the "in the Horse's mouth" by Alec Guiness and Le Mystere Picasso by Claude Cluzot.
These three films about artists, could become the unholy trinity
for those who listen to the beat of a different drum.
I believe, the director made the effort to release it, 20 years after it was made, as an alternative to Julian Schnabel's film "basquiat". Back in the New York 80s, there were two type of artistic world. The Soho type, which followed the Andy Warhol's double edge philosophy: "Making money is an art",and the East Village type, which followed the tradition of the Beat poets.
Ofcourse, the legacy Warhol left when he produced the Velvet Underground as an "art form" and also films of conceptual ideas,( 1960s) were not part of the "making money" image of Soho.
This phase in Warhol's career ( before he became really rich) was the source of the east village bohemians, the so called "Children of Andy Warhol",
Those hipsters, were the one producing the art films and punk bands.
Noone was painting in the east village at the time. One was either a film maker or a member in a punk band. Cool art was graffiti, because it was not considered art by the status quo, and that was precisely what the scene of the east village was looking for: anti-art.
It was not so much wealth what we were after, but be part of the pantheon of die-hard hipsters.
Punk musicians were more and more expressing themselves through film. Basquiat was a member of Gray.(a No Wave Band)(NO Wavers was the underground within the underground in those days)
Debby Harry a member of Blondie. It was said at the time that what made Basquiat truly known within that underground was his encounter with Blondie, who got him into the film. IT is true that he was known as Samo, but that was something else.
Why is this film a holy grail? well, se how many films Picasso did about himself; only one Le Mystere Picasso. In Downtown 81 we not only see the legend, we see the neighborhood and the bands. It is an historical documentary. Something that the author himself ( Im sure) never had in mind when filming it. That is the reason why it was lost for so long. They never thought it was important.
That brings to mind the words of Picasso: "Art is stronger than I, because it makes me do what she wants"
They worked on one more punk film, when in fact it was a jewel in the making, something beyond their grasp. They were merely the instruments that help create a documentary that was destined to exist.
I think this film is as important as the "in the Horse's mouth" by Alec Guiness and Le Mystere Picasso by Claude Cluzot.
These three films about artists, could become the unholy trinity
for those who listen to the beat of a different drum.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
