I have not been a member of the Scottish left for a number of years but followed the Sheridan trials with interest from a distance. I did not know if this book would add anything to what I knew - it does and deserves a wide audience. I read it in a day - it's compelling, clearly written, incisive and humane. It is also in small parts clunky which is why I've given it a four not a five: McCombes has a fondness for supposedly comedic similes that generally jar; he's not above the odd cliche; and he can't resist a few incidental snipes about Sheridan (his lack of culture, limited intellectual outlook and failing post-civil trial career moves) which, though understandable given the personal enmity, would have been better edited out.
Having said that, the book achieves the main purpose I assume the author had for it by providing a detailed, convincing rationale for why the SSP members who testified 'against' Sheridan did what they did. In doing so the appalling reality of Sheridan's behaviour from 2004 onwards is laid bare - not only towards fellow members of the SSP but also in his use of every means at his disposal - fair and unfair - to discredit and destroy the women testifying to the sexual liaisons they had had with him. This book will not stop the war of words about the Sheridan trials and may even reignite them - the left-wing sites commenting on the book suggest that. However I've no doubt it needed to be written and on finishing it found it hard not to have admiration for the author and those of his colleagues who refused to go along with Sheridan's plans. Rather than the bile which has hitherto been thrown at McCombes et al. for giving evidence against Sheridan in the two trials by some on the left, I suspect history will judge that we owe them respect and gratitude for the actions they took.