Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Authors
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.
Product Description
Product Description
A translation of "Don Quijote", a parody but also a cautionary tale, which tells the humorous adventures of the bumbling, infinitely compassionate knight and his shrewdly simple squire. Here, award-winning translator Burton Raffel presents a consistent and fluid translation faithful to the Spanish.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
Leisurely reader: you don't need me to swear that I longed for this book, born out of my own brain, to be the handsomest child imaginable, the most elegant, the most sensible. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Leisurely reader: you don't need me to swear that I longed for this book, born out of my own brain, to be the handsomest child imaginable, the most elegant, the most sensible. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
More than a decade later, it's still a book to live with. This is the best version in English, check it out.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
23 reviews
188 of 192 people found the following review helpful
Raffel vs. Grossman
22 Mar 2005
Format:Paperback
I've spent a bit of time comparing the early pages of Burton Raffel's decade-old rendition with Edith Grossman's brand new one. Both are excellent, so you can't go wrong---and I think either would be a better choice for most people than past translations. I've chosen Raffel's, though, based not only on word choices (and I think some people need to lower their antennae when it comes to things such as Sancho referring to his "kids", which seems quite natural), but on Raffel's better balanced, more focused style, and his clarity of phrasing (which also involves word choices). Raffel's style overall is traditional. Grossman seems to jump between the literal, which is sometimes confusing, and the breezy and modern, which is enjoyable but not as wry and witty as Raffel's balanced approach.
For example, Grossman's description after our hero has tried to grapple with the philosophical convolutions of de Silva: "With these words and phrases the poor gentleman lost his mind, and he spent sleepless nights trying to understand them, and extract their meaning. . . ." Raffel writes: "Arguments like these cost the poor gentleman his sanity; he'd lie awake at night, trying to understand them, to puzzle out their meaning. . . ." A minor example, but with Raffel's rhythm and word choice you can almost visualize the old fellow lying awake trying to "puzzle out" the "arguments"---not just "words and phrases," per se. Raffel is often more subtly attuned. Notice also that "cost the poor gentleman his sanity" is not as modern-sounding as "lost his mind." So don't think that because Raffel uses a few modern word choices for the sake of vigor that he's less distinguished.
Grossman again:
"His fantasy filled with everything he had read in his books, enchantments as well as combats, battles, challenges, wounds, courtings, loves, torments, and other impossible foolishness, and he became so convinced in his imagination of the truth of all the countless grandiloquent and false inventions he read that for him no history in the world was truer."
Raffel:
"He filled his imagination full to bursting with everything he read in his books, from witchcraft to duels, battles, challenges, wounds, flirtations, love affairs, anguish, and impossible foolishness, packing it all so firmly into his head that these sensational schemes and dreams became the literal truth and, as far as he was concerned, there were no more certain histories anywhere on earth."
Grossman's sentence is more difficult to scan, and less concrete. Raffel's clear, no less fine prose in paragraphs like this brings the character of Don Quixote to life.
For example, Grossman's description after our hero has tried to grapple with the philosophical convolutions of de Silva: "With these words and phrases the poor gentleman lost his mind, and he spent sleepless nights trying to understand them, and extract their meaning. . . ." Raffel writes: "Arguments like these cost the poor gentleman his sanity; he'd lie awake at night, trying to understand them, to puzzle out their meaning. . . ." A minor example, but with Raffel's rhythm and word choice you can almost visualize the old fellow lying awake trying to "puzzle out" the "arguments"---not just "words and phrases," per se. Raffel is often more subtly attuned. Notice also that "cost the poor gentleman his sanity" is not as modern-sounding as "lost his mind." So don't think that because Raffel uses a few modern word choices for the sake of vigor that he's less distinguished.
Grossman again:
"His fantasy filled with everything he had read in his books, enchantments as well as combats, battles, challenges, wounds, courtings, loves, torments, and other impossible foolishness, and he became so convinced in his imagination of the truth of all the countless grandiloquent and false inventions he read that for him no history in the world was truer."
Raffel:
"He filled his imagination full to bursting with everything he read in his books, from witchcraft to duels, battles, challenges, wounds, flirtations, love affairs, anguish, and impossible foolishness, packing it all so firmly into his head that these sensational schemes and dreams became the literal truth and, as far as he was concerned, there were no more certain histories anywhere on earth."
Grossman's sentence is more difficult to scan, and less concrete. Raffel's clear, no less fine prose in paragraphs like this brings the character of Don Quixote to life.
31 of 33 people found the following review helpful
Outstanding!
27 Aug 1998
Format:Paperback
As he has with previous translations, Raffel has again proved himself a master at providing an old classic in a fresh and readable way. This edition is even more vitally rendered than the Putnam translation or the Cohen one. While it's true that this work reads more like a loose collection of short stories than like the sort of tightly organized novels we expect today, it still remains an old friend to many of us, and for first readers this translation is direct and passionate.
89 of 106 people found the following review helpful
I was once enthusiastic about this, but--
26 Nov 2003
Format:Paperback
I once thought very highly of this translation, and even recommended it to someone. I was thinking of buying it, and now after browsing it heavily in a bookstore, I'm glad I did not. I have opted for the Edith Grossman translation instead.
This translation could almost be called "'Don Quixote' for the Under-Thirty Crowd". I am all for modern translations of this great work, and I fully support the idea of modernizing antiquated language in a translation and avoiding sounding heavy or old-fashioned. This is NOT the same as a translator being so eager to make a version of a great work accessible to normally uninterested readers, that the translation is purposely made in a TOO informal style.
The language of this translation is almost ostentatiously colloquial, and I'm not trying to be a snob about this. Even the narration is deliberately phrased in as colloquial a manner as possible. Contractions abound all over the place, not only in the dialogue, but in the narration--something I frankly don't remember any other author doing when he or she is writing in the third person. I am not criticizing the translation for not being accurate--it is highly accurate, with some very ingenious English equivalents for obscure phrases. But there is not a single sentence that does not use an informal style of writing, and if one wants to get picky about it, it is very difficult to imagine a very well-educated sixteenth-century gentleman like Don Quixote speaking like this.
And Raffel makes a catastrophic translation error at the beginning of the novel which apparently neither he, nor his editor, nor any critic has yet caught. In describing Alonso Quijana, the old gentleman who eventually becomes Don Quixote after going mad, Cervantes states something like "In short, the old gentleman so immersed himself in his books..", etc. Raffel actually writes, "In short, Don Quixote so immersed himself in his books", thus introducing the name "Don Quixote" in the narrative before Cervantes himself mentions it.
The fact that this error has not been pointed out by ANYONE is proof of how blindly overpraised this translation has been. It is accurate, but it is too eager to be "readable" rather than great.
This translation could almost be called "'Don Quixote' for the Under-Thirty Crowd". I am all for modern translations of this great work, and I fully support the idea of modernizing antiquated language in a translation and avoiding sounding heavy or old-fashioned. This is NOT the same as a translator being so eager to make a version of a great work accessible to normally uninterested readers, that the translation is purposely made in a TOO informal style.
The language of this translation is almost ostentatiously colloquial, and I'm not trying to be a snob about this. Even the narration is deliberately phrased in as colloquial a manner as possible. Contractions abound all over the place, not only in the dialogue, but in the narration--something I frankly don't remember any other author doing when he or she is writing in the third person. I am not criticizing the translation for not being accurate--it is highly accurate, with some very ingenious English equivalents for obscure phrases. But there is not a single sentence that does not use an informal style of writing, and if one wants to get picky about it, it is very difficult to imagine a very well-educated sixteenth-century gentleman like Don Quixote speaking like this.
And Raffel makes a catastrophic translation error at the beginning of the novel which apparently neither he, nor his editor, nor any critic has yet caught. In describing Alonso Quijana, the old gentleman who eventually becomes Don Quixote after going mad, Cervantes states something like "In short, the old gentleman so immersed himself in his books..", etc. Raffel actually writes, "In short, Don Quixote so immersed himself in his books", thus introducing the name "Don Quixote" in the narrative before Cervantes himself mentions it.
The fact that this error has not been pointed out by ANYONE is proof of how blindly overpraised this translation has been. It is accurate, but it is too eager to be "readable" rather than great.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
