Doctor Who: Bunker Soldiers [Paperback]

Fans of the First Doctor will love this-a splendid, spanking read mixing history and SF plot ingredients to make a satisfying whole.

The story is sound, and while yes I agree with another reviewer on this page that Steven is perhaps a little blandly characterised, the Doctor comes wholly to the fore. One can just imagine Hartnell giving it his all! This is the best 1st Dr novel yet published. Better even than The Plotters or The Witch Hunters. Buy It!!!!

The First Doctor and his companions find themselves trapped within the city of Kiev, shortly before it is besieged by the Mongol Empire in 1240. As if that wasn't bad enough, the citizens of Kiev start suffering from a mysterious plague shortly after their saviour, a 'dark angel' that fell from the skies centuries earlier, is awakened.

This is a thoroughly entertaining novel set during a period of history I knew very little about, so I ended up learning as I was reading - always an added bonus whilst reading.

The majority of the story is written from the perspective of the Doctor's companion, Steven Taylor, which is another point in the novel's favour, as first-person narrative always goes down well with me. One thing that I found odd was that, although we're privy to Steven's thoughts, we don't actually find out anything about him. 'Who' fans will know that he's a space pilot from Earth's future, but he could just as well be a binman from the twentieth-century, his character is so lacking in this book. But that's a minor grumble at best.

Fans of the Doctor's historical adventures should not be disappointed with this novel despite the rather jarring scenes with the eponymous alien 'bunker soldier' which the city's inhabitants view as their guardian angel against the Mongol hordes. A welcome addition to the 'Past Doctors Adventures' range.

"Bunker Soldiers" is perhaps the most peculiar first Doctor novel that I've read to date. By all outward appearances it is a completely routine affair, irrespective of whether you look at it as a BBC Books adventure or as a Season 3 "Doctor Who" story. Even as I read the book, Martin Day's story utterly failed to feel even slightly contentious, yet now that I've come to write this review, and pass comment on disease-riddled corpses being launched from catapults as primitive bio-weapons; fathers chastising their wayward daughters; Steven's odd first-person narration; and even an alien threat rearing its head in a first Doctor historical, I begin to see that "Bunker Soldiers" is something of a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The early passages in particular really emphasise the redolence of the novel. With the Time Lord and his companions stranded in medieval Kiev, so faraway but yet so close to the ship, the only factor that seems to set "Bunker Soldiers" apart from its peers initially is the unusual length of time that their situation has endured.

Similarly, the rich backdrop painted by the author positively reeks of the series' inaugural jaunts into the past; even his relatively kind depiction of the Mongols is reminiscent of the series' often quite tempered representation of real-life events and people. Moreover, the story is saturated with enough well-researched historical detail to fulfil the "Doctor Who"'s early educational mandate. I certainly learned a thing a two here, ranging from the Mongol absorption of the Tartars to the real cause of the Black Death.

Yet, almost unconsciously, "Bunker Soldiers" has a lot more grit to it than first appears to be the case. Whilst Day's portrayal of Ogedei Khan and his Mongols is almost Klingon in its nobility, at times the Mongols are as monstrous as any alien creature that could have been thrown into the fray, and this is reflected in the novel not only through their actions but through sheer repute. I was particularly fascinated by the notion that the people of the world viewed the Mongols almost as being aliens, with rumours of their "dogs heads" and enthusiasm for raping virgins "to death" being passed from village to village almost as myth.

Furthermore, Dodo's role here, though probably the weakest aspect of the story, is equally forthright. Her friendship with Lesia and the associated subject matter would never have even made it close to a 1966 television screen, yet to Day's credit I didn't even blink as I read it. Somehow it just felt seamless.

Steven's role in the proceedings is similarly unconventional as he narrates most of the book in the first person. Why the writer chose to present much of his story in this fashion I have no idea; perhaps he relished the challenge of trying to infuse one of the Doctor's most brash and least developed companions with a little soul. Sadly, he didn't quite manage it for me. Steven's narration offers the reader little in terms of fresh insight into the character and, to my surprise, doesn't even have much to say on Steven's long standing moral debate with the Doctor about interfering in history (as explored on television in "The Massacre," and more recently in print in "Salvation"). That said, this narration does at least add a little colour in that the discomfort and squalor of the Dark Ages is really made grotesquely explicit, but this is hardly anything to get excited about.

Day's alien threat - the "Dark Angel" or "Bunker Soldier" - is more successful, in my view, though it really doesn't come into its own until very late on in the story. Even then, it is more the idea of what this creature is in principle and the unique way in which it fights its battles that entertains, rather than anything that it actually does.

In some ways, I can't help but think that "Bunker Soldiers" might have been more of a hit had Day made it a pure historical; at least that way, it might have really appealed to devotees of William Hartnell's Doctor, as opposed to just moderately so. For me though, this novel's greatest achievement is that it manages to tell a surprisingly modern and mature story yet maintain an overridingly traditional feel, and for that alone it is well worth the read.

Originally published on "The History of the Doctor," 2006. Reproduced with kind permission.