Watch now

Quantity:1
Doctor Who - Paradise Tow... has been added to your Basket
+ £1.26 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by momox co uk
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Please allow 1-2 weeks for delivery. For DVDs please check region code before ordering.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
Colour:
  • Doctor Who - Paradise Towers [DVD] [1987]
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available
      

Doctor Who - Paradise Towers [DVD] [1987]

64 customer reviews

Price: £6.80 & FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £20. Details
Only 14 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
21 new from £5.68 2 used from £4.21
£6.80 & FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £20. Details Only 14 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Special Offers and Product Promotions


Frequently Bought Together

Doctor Who - Paradise Towers [DVD] [1987] + Doctor Who - Delta and the Bannermen [DVD] [1987] + Doctor Who - Time and the Rani [DVD] [1987]
Price For All Three: £20.49

Buy the selected items together

Product details

  • Actors: Sylvester McCoy, Bonnie Langford
  • Format: PAL
  • Language: English
  • Subtitles: English
  • Subtitles For The Hearing Impaired: English
  • Region: Region 2 (This DVD may not be viewable outside Europe. Read more about DVD formats.)
  • Aspect Ratio: 4:3 - 1.33:1
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Classification: PG
  • Studio: 2 Entertain Video
  • DVD Release Date: 18 July 2011
  • Run Time: 97 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (64 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B004VRO84M
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 8,402 in DVD & Blu-ray (See Top 100 in DVD & Blu-ray)

Reviews

Mel wants to go swimming so the Doctor takes her to a tower block called Paradise Towers where there is reputed to be a fantastic pool. When they arrive they discover that the place is far from being the superb leisure resort they had expected - it is run-down and dilapidated.

The hallways are roamed by gangs of young girls known as Kangs; the apartments are inhabited by cannibalistic old ladies, the Rezzies; and the building is managed by a group of dictatorial caretakers, presided over by the Chief Caretaker…

Special Features

  • Commentary with cast and crew
  • Documentaries and behind the scenes footage
  • Photo Gallery
  • Digitally re-mastered picture and sound quality

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Benjamin Coupland on 21 Jan. 2014
Verified Purchase
'Paradise Towers' has a rather poor reputation, in fact it is perceived by many to be one of the weakest Doctor Who stories ever. Is this reputation deserved? Absolutely not in my opinion.

There are some wonderful sets for the towers, in the past Doctor Who sets had been inappropriate because they were so spotlessly clean, in this story the sets look grubby and help to create the impression that Paradise towers is dilapidated and neglected. The sets are assisted by some remarkably effective red, blue and green lighting. Admittedly though some of the sets, the Rezzies' flat for example, are rather over lit.

After a shaky performance in 'Time and the Rani' Sylvester McCoy starts to find his feet as the Doctor and his performance here is on the whole very good. Sadly Bonnie Langford's performance is poor, she's just too cheerful and upbeat (this seems especially unsuitable in the scenes set after she has almost been cannibalised by two old ladies).

It has been suggested that Richard Briers' performance here is a career low. I couldn't disagree more, for the first three episodes Briers gives a very amusing and entertaining performance as the Chief Caretaker (the manner in which he converses with Kroagnon in the basement is especially hilarious). I will admit that Briers goes over the top when portraying Kroagnon in the body of the Chief Caretaker in the last episode, but this is nowhere near as bad as some would have you believe. Clive Merrison gives a good performance as the Deputy Chief Caretaker.

Howard Cooke may be a poor physical fit for the character of Pex (who was supposed to be really muscular) but he gives a strong performance.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Tim Bradley on 22 Sept. 2014
"Ice hot, Doctor! Ice hot!"

I really have enjoyed watching `Paradise Towers'! Okay, it's not the greatest `Doctor Who' story ever in the world. But it's a fun story, and I think it is where `Doctor Who' gets really good in terms of story-telling in this one. The story's plot is pretty plausible with lots of concepts and interesting ideas running through it. Sometimes it's difficult to take it seriously with bouts of comedy running through it. But I enjoyed the comedy for the fun of it. The story does have merit, even though some of the ideas weren't executed as well as originally intended.

The story of `Paradise Towers' was written by newcomer to the series Stephen Wyatt. Stephen was commissioned to write this four-part adventure during the making of Sylvester McCoy's first season as the Doctor. The show at the time was made under immense pressure and Sylvester's era had a rocky start following his debut story 'Time and the Rani'. But `Paradise Towers' is a story where the Seventh Doctor era began to pick up and find its feet, even though there was still a lot to do and a long way off before `Doctor Who' could reinvent itself.

In `Paradise Towers', the story has the Doctor and Mel arrive in this high-rise tower block somewhere in the future. Whether it's Earth future somewhere in the 21st century or later than that I do not know. But it's a place where it's supposed to be pure luxury. Mel wants to go to `Paradise Towers' to see the swimming pool as it happens to be the most beautiful and amazing swimming pool ever. However, the place is a shambles and dirt and grime has worn over the years.
Read more ›
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Number13 TOP 500 REVIEWER on 18 May 2014
In fact, Paradise Not Quite Last, there are a few `Doctor Who' episodes often thought worse than this. But not many. 2*

`Paradise Towers' is a huge, once luxurious residential complex now fallen into squalor. It would be easy to see this as yet one more political satire on the 1980s, but tower blocks grew from the Utopian idealism of the 1950s; `the people' would be given new, modern homes in futuristic blocks, and they would be happy. But even twenty years before `Paradise Towers' was broadcast, `the people' often weren't happy - one of the stock complaints went along the lines of `those architects build these places but they don't live here themselves'. Be careful what you wish for - in `Paradise Towers' the `Great Architect' does indeed live in the building, and he definitely doesn't like the residents spoiling his vision of concrete perfection ...

So why are the Doctor and Mel in the building at all? Because Mel wants to swim in its pool ... there are worlds out there with effervescent oceans but no it must be this pool. So she goes looking for the pool while the Doctor wanders around the corridors and they both run into odd characters and trouble. Personally I found Mel the most annoying companion ever, a gratingly cheerful and unbearably bubbly character. (For another example of a cheerful, bubbly - but wonderful - companion, see `Jo Grant'.) Sylvester McCoy finds the Seventh Doctor's most humorous side, he's one semi-comic element of the story that works well and it's a contrast with the serious, mysterious Doctor he played later. But he really doesn't have enough to do here.

The building looks great, sets and location filming blending to create a convincingly run-down `paradise' where the problem isn't just the building, it's the people.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   



Feedback