| ||||||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £0.50
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Diplomacy for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.50, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
Simon Schama "The New Yorker" Kissinger's absorbing book tackles head-on some of the toughest questions of our time....Its pages sparkle with insight.
Product Description
'Kissinger's absorbing book tackles head-on some of the toughest questions of our time ...Its pages sparkle with insight' Simon Schama in the NEW YORKER Spanning more than three centuries, from Cardinal Richelieu to the fragility of the 'New World Order', DIPLOMACY is the now-classic history of international relations by the former Secretary of State and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. Kissinger's intimate portraits of world leaders, many from personal experience, provide the reader with a unique insight into what really goes on -- and why -- behind the closed doors of the corridors of power. 'Budding diplomats and politicians should read it as avidly as their predecessors read Machiavelli' Douglas Hurd in the DAILY TELEGRAPH 'If you want to pay someone a compliment, give them Henry Kissinger's DIPLOMACY ...It is certainly one of the best, and most enjoyable [books] on international relations past and present ...DIPLOMACY should be read for the sheer historical sweep, the characterisations, the story-telling, the ability to look at large parts of the world as a whole' Malcolm Rutherford in the FINANCIAL TIMES
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
Almost as if according to some natural law, in every century there seems to emerge a country with the power, the will, and the intellectual and moral impetus to shape the entire international system in accordance with its own values. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Almost as if according to some natural law, in every century there seems to emerge a country with the power, the will, and the intellectual and moral impetus to shape the entire international system in accordance with its own values. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
30 of 37 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Just a few facts anyone considering buying this book needs to know before they part with their hard-earned greenbacks. It is really a book of two halves: pre-1945, and post-1945. Indeed, the diplomacy of WW2 and the 40 years immediately afterwards, is given very close analysis by the author, to the extent that it covers half the book. Yet Kissenger seems to pick his subjects selectively, rather than providing us with a comprehensive overview. The Cuban Missile Crisis, for example, gets only cursory treatment, but Vietnam gets three chapters! Similarly, the Sino-Soviet split, the Arab-Israeli Wars, the Indo-Pakistan crises, all are relegated to bit parts.
The book begins in the 1600s with Cardinal Richelieu, and seems to intimate that prior to this, international diplomacy did not exist, or was dominated by religious issues - an oversimplification at best. No insights are given to the way the Ancients dealt with each other, and the lessons to be drawn from this (e.g. Roman diplomatic thought must give us a useful comparative model vis-a-vis today's Pax Americana, but no, Kissenger feels it is irrelevant).
I also felt that Asia was sadly neglected in this work. The complex relationship between the US and Japan in the 1920s and 1930s is utterly ignored - Japan only starts to appear in the book in 1941, yet is was an important part of British strategy in Asia as early as 1901. The epochal arms limitation agreements limiting fleet sizes in 1921 and 1930 are also ignored. Indeed, Asia only appears in Kissenger's sights when US troops are embroiled there after 1945 in Korea and Vietnam. Post-1949 Chinese foreign policy, and, indeed, China's historical record with its neighbours in the period 1600-1800 are also ignored, a pity given China's increasing importance on the world stage.
On the positive side, it does give an insight into Kissenger's mind. There are some anecdotes on his meetings with famous players in 20th century politics, like Charles de Gaulle and Harry Truman, as well as some educational views on ge-strategic relationships (I liked his analysis of the inadequacies of western intelligence services).
In summary, the valuable part of this book is the second half, and more as a tool to understand the author and the Cold War rather than the art of diplomacy itself.
The book begins in the 1600s with Cardinal Richelieu, and seems to intimate that prior to this, international diplomacy did not exist, or was dominated by religious issues - an oversimplification at best. No insights are given to the way the Ancients dealt with each other, and the lessons to be drawn from this (e.g. Roman diplomatic thought must give us a useful comparative model vis-a-vis today's Pax Americana, but no, Kissenger feels it is irrelevant).
I also felt that Asia was sadly neglected in this work. The complex relationship between the US and Japan in the 1920s and 1930s is utterly ignored - Japan only starts to appear in the book in 1941, yet is was an important part of British strategy in Asia as early as 1901. The epochal arms limitation agreements limiting fleet sizes in 1921 and 1930 are also ignored. Indeed, Asia only appears in Kissenger's sights when US troops are embroiled there after 1945 in Korea and Vietnam. Post-1949 Chinese foreign policy, and, indeed, China's historical record with its neighbours in the period 1600-1800 are also ignored, a pity given China's increasing importance on the world stage.
On the positive side, it does give an insight into Kissenger's mind. There are some anecdotes on his meetings with famous players in 20th century politics, like Charles de Gaulle and Harry Truman, as well as some educational views on ge-strategic relationships (I liked his analysis of the inadequacies of western intelligence services).
In summary, the valuable part of this book is the second half, and more as a tool to understand the author and the Cold War rather than the art of diplomacy itself.
12 of 16 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Sometimes it takes an outsider to understand the nature of a country and its direction. Henry Kissinger certainly does that to my mind. Although a previous reviewer is correct when he points out that centuries of diplomatic activity is given very quick analysis and telling, the book obviously has other concerns than the history of diplomacy. It is more about the nature of American diplomacy. And three hundred years of European diplomacy is used to enlighten that particular connundrum.
The book, unsurprisingly I suppose, focuses a great deal on the periods of history that the author has direct relation with. A great many pages are expended on the issues and forces at work in Vietnam - eerily reminisecent in its genesis of the current situation in Iraq. That in itself is interesting. As are the many anecdotes, thumbnail portraits and recounted attitudes of major pollitical figures, again especially over the last fifty years. The book is entertaining both as a political and historical work.
The weaknesses of it are weaknesses that would be expected from Henry Kissinger. The focus of the book resides solely in the manipulation of power throughout history. There is no broadening of the book into areas such as the legitimacy of certain wars or even some of the darker actions of diplomacy throughout the years: the American backed coup in Chile; the support given for the Suharto regime; the death of a million Indonesians, sponsored by America, are not touched upon: the reasons why states act the way they do and their interconnection with economics remain unexplored. Kissinger would argue, probably, that these questions and actions were outwith the paradigm of his argument. Fair enough.
For the book is really an argument, using history to illustrate two key concepts, and illuminate and repudiate another. Kissinger cites America as an idealistic nation whose expectations of themselves and the world do not meet with reality as it actually is. This fosters disillusion and withdrawal and disaster.(Woodrow Wilson and the Versailles Treaty are spectactular examples of this. The one's fourteen points abandoned; and the peace of Versailles that appealed to such abstract concepts like justice and retribution on behalf of the victors yet ignored the requirments and likely developments of the political situation, thereby stored up catastrophe for later on.) There is a always a danger that America will withdraw from the world when matters do not go as hoped for.
Kissinger instead asks for a policy of engagement with the world by America, based on the premises of realpolitik or raison d'etat (the heroes of the book are Bismark and Richlieu: the villain the-absurdly-blind-to-the-realities-of-power Napoleon III). The world is multi-polar and imperfect; but America needs to engage and needs to accept working within limits. This is, for Kissinger, the best that can be achieved. As an argument it is painstakingly, subtly and thoroughly put together. It is a powerful, well-written work that educates and persuades. For anyone interested in the subject this is a good read.
The book, unsurprisingly I suppose, focuses a great deal on the periods of history that the author has direct relation with. A great many pages are expended on the issues and forces at work in Vietnam - eerily reminisecent in its genesis of the current situation in Iraq. That in itself is interesting. As are the many anecdotes, thumbnail portraits and recounted attitudes of major pollitical figures, again especially over the last fifty years. The book is entertaining both as a political and historical work.
The weaknesses of it are weaknesses that would be expected from Henry Kissinger. The focus of the book resides solely in the manipulation of power throughout history. There is no broadening of the book into areas such as the legitimacy of certain wars or even some of the darker actions of diplomacy throughout the years: the American backed coup in Chile; the support given for the Suharto regime; the death of a million Indonesians, sponsored by America, are not touched upon: the reasons why states act the way they do and their interconnection with economics remain unexplored. Kissinger would argue, probably, that these questions and actions were outwith the paradigm of his argument. Fair enough.
For the book is really an argument, using history to illustrate two key concepts, and illuminate and repudiate another. Kissinger cites America as an idealistic nation whose expectations of themselves and the world do not meet with reality as it actually is. This fosters disillusion and withdrawal and disaster.(Woodrow Wilson and the Versailles Treaty are spectactular examples of this. The one's fourteen points abandoned; and the peace of Versailles that appealed to such abstract concepts like justice and retribution on behalf of the victors yet ignored the requirments and likely developments of the political situation, thereby stored up catastrophe for later on.) There is a always a danger that America will withdraw from the world when matters do not go as hoped for.
Kissinger instead asks for a policy of engagement with the world by America, based on the premises of realpolitik or raison d'etat (the heroes of the book are Bismark and Richlieu: the villain the-absurdly-blind-to-the-realities-of-power Napoleon III). The world is multi-polar and imperfect; but America needs to engage and needs to accept working within limits. This is, for Kissinger, the best that can be achieved. As an argument it is painstakingly, subtly and thoroughly put together. It is a powerful, well-written work that educates and persuades. For anyone interested in the subject this is a good read.
Format:Paperback
Kissinger's Diplomacy is a very insightful book and one that is hard to put down. The book is theoretically split into two distinct sections. The first one focuses on diplomacy in early modern history from Richelieu through Metternich, Disraeli and Bismarck to the Second World War. It details how diplomacy worked in the European Theatre through the use of balance of power and the impact of President Wilson on post-war Europe. The second section looks at diplomatic efforts from 1945, most of which Kissinger was heavily involved with and considers the balance between practical diplomacy and how the people, specifically the American public, viewed the actions of the main players. Recommended to any political historian and those of us who are just interested in how the political world came to be.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Educating
Another pleasantly surprising exam book. Well written and analysed, although omitting quite a lot and naturally and clearly biased. Focused on high politics. Read more
Published 21 months ago by Sipilä Jussi
Refund/replacementstill not received. Terrible Customer Service
I received this book from amazon. It can been poorly packed and as such the front 50 pages were folded over and damaged. Read more
Published 22 months ago by Daniel
Absolutely Superb
This was one of the best books I have ever read. Unlike Kissinger's autobiographies-cum-histories of the Nixon Years, this book is superbly concise, focused and compelling. Read more
Published on 2 Aug 2009 by Mr. F. J. Evans
The geek who got to implement!
Kissinger is one of those rare beasts who actually got to implement policy after spending many years discussing foreign relations in the hallowed halls of Harvard, Cambridge, Yale... Read more
Published on 11 May 2009 by Hilary Robb
Excellent analysis and clear insight
Diplomacy is a very rare book, in that it blends a great expertise of History and personal experience of international relations together. Read more
Published on 10 July 2008 by Mr. D. Horsley
a history and a polemic
A casual reader would be advised to consult the likes of E.H. Carr for an introduction to realist foreign policy before reading 'Diplomacy', as Kissinger assumes a lot of prior... Read more
Published on 21 Dec 2002 by Janan Ganesh
Great analysis on global policy
This is really great book which describes history of global politics and the roots of diplomacy giving brief identification internationally for college students.
Published on 28 May 2001
Fascinating opinion on diplomacy and history
But be aware that opinion does not equal truth. It is obvious that Kissinger (or anybody else for that matter) is not going to speak against his country and its Foreign Service. Read more
Published on 29 May 1999
Very insightful - not just a rehash of events.
Overall the book was great. I found the book a little hard to read at times, particularly the treatment of pre-WWI events. Read more
Published on 20 Feb 1998
The best manual ever written on international relations
In this book, the US Secretary of State clearly reveals how international relations work and help us to undertand why is the world in such a way nowadays. Read more
Published on 25 Aug 1997
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
