£21.95 + £1.26 shipping
In stock. Sold by EliteDigital UK
+ £1.26 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: This item is very good condition.We are going to ship from Japan, the delivery time is about 14-21days.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Image Unavailable

Image not available for
  • Deconstruction [US-Import]
  • Sorry, this item is not available in
  • Image not available

Deconstruction [US-Import]

Price: £21.95
Only 1 left in stock.
Dispatched from and sold by EliteDigital UK.
8 used from £6.73 1 collectible from £29.99

Amazon's Deconstruction Store

Visit Amazon's Deconstruction Store
for all the music, discussions, and more.

Product details

  • Audio CD
  • Number of Discs: 1
  • Label: ja
  • ASIN: B000002MPL
  • Other Editions: Audio CD  |  Audio Cassette
  • Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 55,459 in Music (See Top 100 in Music)

Product Description

features: FLEA (red hot chili peppers)

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By nin/ja77 on 27 Jun. 2011
Format: Audio CD
After Jane's Addiction split in 1991 frontman Perry Farrell went on to from Porno For Pyros taking with him Jane's Addiction drummer Stephen Perkins. The other two members of Jane's Bassist Eric Avery and Dave Navarro went on to form Deconstruction, and whilst Porno For Pyros would go on to enjoy critical and commercial success people shouldn't forget this lost/hidden gem of an album.

The album has Avery on Bass and vocals, Navarro is on guitar and backing vocals. Michael murphy performs drums on the album. Starting off with "L.A Song" a track that starts off with a word spoken Avery vocal before giving away to a funky bass and guitar sound, the interaction between Avery's lead vocals and Navaro's backing vocals works brilliantly. "Single" is a slow haunting track that has element of Jane's Addiction from "Ritual De Lo Habitual". "Get At 'Em" features Gibby Haynes of Butthole Surfers on voclas and he adds to its funkiness, he also features on the track "Fire In The Hole". The album is packed full of great tracks such as "Dirge" the seven minute long "America" and "Wait For History". The album is over an hour long but it's an album you can easily lose yourself in.

Many people have said that Porno For Pyros self titled debut would have been the third great album by Jane's Addiction, people might change their minds if they listen to this long lost/hidden/undiscovered gem of an album. They never toured and a year later Dave Navarro had joined the Red Hot Chilli Peppers but what remains is some great musicianship and songs. A great album!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Audio CD Verified Purchase
Despite the anonymous looking cover what we have here is half of Janes Addiction and a different drummer. Dave Navarro on guitar, Eric Avery on bass and vox and Michael Murphy on drums.

So with credentials like this you would expect the music to be good, which it is, some tracks being very good indeed. However, this band fail to light the fuse the way Janes Addiction could, which is a pity really. Some of Averys lyrics are a tad on the meh side of things, not that Perry Farrell was a poetic genius or anything in that league.

Best track - Big Sur with its loping bass and staccato guitar work.

Overall a good solid rock album with a hint of funk.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 22 reviews
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful
awe-inspiring and brilliant, but maybe not for everyone 17 July 2003
By D. I. Javier - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
a little history: this is the single-album project that Eric Avery (bass) and Dave Navarro (guitar) of Jane's Addiction put together after the band broke up to get the last of that era out of their systems before moving on to other things.
how did it turn out? I think it is one of the best albums in my collection and could easily compete with "Ritual de lo Habitual" or "Nothing's Shocking" in terms of musical virtuosity, quality of songwriting, and, perhaps most importantly, imagination and beauty.
the album was a conscious effort to break away from standard rock song structures. the end result is a collection of beautifully crafted, interesting and complex songs. they throb with power and passion and shimmer with polished technique, and are held together with solid songwriting. for fans of guitar greatness, the song "Iris" (an instrumental) is probably reason enough to pick up this album. some of Dave Navarro's finest strumming went into this project.
not all Jane's Addiction fans will go for this album. Eric Avery does the singing on most of the songs (Navarro sings "Big Sur") and his voice is certainly an adjustment from Perry Farrell's. he sounds a bit like Peter Murphy, if anyone is familiar with that style. on first listen it may sound dirgelike and monotonous, but give it a chance and I think you will grow to love Avery's vocal style.
if you are looking for an interesting, forward-thinking album that will keep you listening for years, you really ought to give this album a try. it may not be for you, but it may also become that obscure, little-known gem in your collection.
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful
How Deconstruction Was Born & Dead 28 April 2006
By Luca Mirabile - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
Eric Avery,Dave Navarro & Michael Murphy on Deconstruction:

Dave Navarro: Jane's Addiction ended and we just got together and started playing music. Eric and I had wanted to do something on our own, somewhat removed from the whole Hollywood-L.A. band thing, and just do something for ourselves.

Eric Avery: I liken having been in Jane's Addiction to having a relationship with someone that's all wrong. Part of what makes the sex so great is what makes it doomed to an early end. This analogy really does apply, because when you break up with somebody, when you've been in relationship like the one I had with Jane's Addiction, you swear off all relationships at first. You know you'll die a lonely dowager, but that's OK. And then out of the blue, you get your penis rekindled.

During the eight years I was in the band, I went through the whole process. In the beginning, we were all naive, things were going well, it was really fun. Then the band started to take off, and everything went through the roof. Unfortunately, things became business-like, uncomfortable, and we began to split apart. It's weird to be at the end of a cycle like that, having run the gamut of the usual 'rock story' from beginning to end. Get signed, get strung out, break up.

Michael Murphy: I played with Eric about three years ago in another band called Daisy Chamber. That's when I met him. The Ritual de lo Habitual record had just been recorded and he had a little time off before they started touring. He was a temporary member of Daisy Chamber. After Jane's broke up, I ran into him at Canter's Deli. He told me he and Dave had been having trouble finding a drummer, so he said, 'Come on down.' I did, and things gelled immediately.

Eric: Shortly after the last Jane's Addiction concert in Hawaii, I rented a house in Big Sur. I ostensibly went up there to just detoxify from the whole Jane's Addiction experience. While I was in Big Sur, I spent a certain amount of time every day writing. It was really a discipline because if I didn't do it one day, I really felt like I was sloughing off. The nice surprise was that as I started to think about what I wanted to do, I got excited again.

Dave: Everything was fair game as far as we were concerned. That was the whole point -- to take elements of different types of sound and music, and put them all together, even if they didn't necessarily fit in. Eric had gone up to Big Sur by himself and had written a few things. At the time, I was getting my life together and writing a few things on my own. He came back, we had time, and we just basically started working on my 8-track in my apartment.

Eric: I felt the prognosis on my musical career was looking bleak because I had spent so much time with it being a business. I had made a joy a duty, a great phrase that I got from a friend's mother. I felt finished about making rock music. I was also simultaneously disillusioned about the whole alternative music scene, and I still feel that way. In the process of starting to think about it and talk about it, I started to get excited. I wasn't interested in making rock music per se any more. But then I began to think that it might be interesting to tinker around with song writing structure, not doing verses and choruses and things like that. That's when my interest was piqued about making guitar music, the idea of using loops and putting together parts like David Salle paintings, putting parts that don't work next to each other and seeing if a new relationship happens between them. This process lead up to 'L.A. Song.' The first and second parts of 'L.A. Song' have no real connection, but the fact we put them together does make sense because we allow them to exist side by side.

Dave: Deconstruction is what it is. It was just a project Eric and I felt like we needed to do. I'm glad we did it. It helped me grow as a musician. I'm proud of a lot of the work on the album. It was a great learning process.

Eric: The word deconstruction applied to where I was at the time and also was prophetic about where I was going to be a year and a half later. It represented the demise of Jane's Addiction, the final break between David [Navarro] and I, and really signifies that I really am no longer in Jane's Addiction. That part of my life is really in the past.

The name Deconstruction fit instinctively without my knowing why. It seemed to dictate exactly what the experience was going to be about - not only in the relationship that I had with David, but how I made my music.It fits with deconstructive philosophy but the choice was totally unconscious, not contrived or manipulated. We began to write songs, not paying attention to what was being put out as far as the alternate of sound.

Eric:You can't say that there isn't intent in this record. It's obvious that something is being said, whether you like what's being said or you don't. And I was so intent on every song. Once you get it all done, put it away, and then look at the life that you've lived for the time that you've been working on it, you see how inexplicably tied together your personal process is and how it came out on the record in ways you didn't realize. This actually tied into an identity thing. It really was like there were two processes going on during this time and that's part of the reason why it had to take as long as it did. It's interesting because what I had been apathetic about and ready to dismiss, I wound up a year and a half later fighting desperately to keep. This wasn't an easy process.

Michael: I was able to bring a lot of samples and electronic stuff to it. The music developed into something different from anything else around, in that it's a combination of elements. We tried to keep things mixed up, so it wasn't just a take-off of Jane's.

Eric: When we recorded 'Big Sur', we actually had to go to record stores, buy records and scratch them up to get a good scratch sound, so that we could put in a Hawaiian sound. It's a small part in between the first two verses before the song starts to get slow. In between the two parts, it just sort of drops out. But it's interesting. I was just thinking about my travels up and down the coast during the making of this record and how much of a sense of place there is. I mean before we changed the name, there were three places named L.A., Big Sur, and San Francisco. But I was just thinking about how so often that's how David, Micheal and I communicated to each other during the creative process. We would say 'it's like Big Sur,' and that's how we named it 'Big Sur.' Because actually so much of what I'm talking about was in the desert and not actually from Big Sur. But I kept saying the first two verses should be like being in the city and then the middle part should be like your driving up the coast and then the end should be that you arrive in Big Sur.

Michael: We spent a long time with three or four parts on 'L.A. Song' that seemed to have nothing to do with each other. It was like a jig-saw puzzle, and finally one day we put it together correctly.

Dave: L.A. Song captures what L.A. is about for us. It's a day in the life of L.A. Listening to it takes you through morning, noon, rush hour, evening.

Eric: It's funny, because I was talking to someone about listening to music in cars and she pointed out that that isn't just indicative of L.A., that you spend a lot of time listening to music in cars. I have to remember that because here we don't walk or do anything except drive places. I do probably ninety percent of my music listening in the car. I rarely come home and put on music.

Dave: The creative process involved trying different things on 8-tracks and cramming them together. There was no method, there was no formula. Every song was its own thing. We just threw everything in a pot and discovered what tasted good. We wanted songs that weren't necessarily verse-chorus-verse-chorus-guitar solo-outro. We didn't want standard rock songs, we wanted to be more experimental. I think we did that.

Eric: After feeling so jaded about music for so long, I picked up an instrument that I really have not played at all. And it's such a big piece of the record. It really fit with that whole 'starting over' feeling. And I feel more that way about this record than I did about the first Jane's Addiction record. I said to somebody once, if I'm scared, then I'm doing something right. If I'm really trying to open the flood gates and see what happens, then I can't know whether or not it's really great. And so therefore, if I have that knowledge or even think I have that knowledge, then there's a calculation process that's going on that prevents trying to honestly open the mouth and see what happens. 'Get At 'Em' was the first song that I wrote, so it represented a lot of pent-up stuff. It seemed to build and build, and feel like 'too many heart beats a minute.' That was such a catharsis. At the time I had just come off being a commodity because we got so big in Jane's Addiction.

Eric: At times, I've thought things like, "does Brian Ferry sing that way because that's the best he can do?" I always assume that these things are stylistic decisions people make. But in my case, most people wondered "Why did Eric sing so low in a lot of the songs?" The answer is that's where I'm the most comfortable singing. In actuality, that's just the best that I can do.

Dave: This isn't a record for everybody. Some people will like it, some won't like it at all. We weren't aiming for mass appeal. We were aiming to get a lot of things within ourselves out in the open, which we accomplished. After Jane's Addiction, it was time to do something completely different, and we were a little selfish about it. We did more musically from a real cerebral point of view.

Eric: And so the answer is try to pay close attention to where you're at as an individual rather than as a creative artist, because if you're not careful, you'll change. What I want to do now is very different from what Deconstruction was. I mean, there will be elements that are similar, but it's kind of the opposite attack that I'll be coming from, of wanting things to stay the same and be repetitive. Deconstruction is about distinctive individual voices and sounds. What we've done is to say, "This is what alternative music is." Alternative music has become the same thing as pop music. It was popular music. And then the word just became pop and now pop means something else. It's no longer the original meaning of the term, and the same thing is true for alternative music. We're still close enough to it that we don't read it as easily, but alternative music, by definition, can't be what you hear on the radio all the time. Because then, that's not an alternative.

Dave: It was never etched in stone that Deconstruction was a band we were going to do for a long time. It was just something Eric and I felt we needed to do. I don't look at this as a band falling apart. I look at it like Eric and I just wanted to do different things. We did the record. We had a great time doing it, had a hard time doing it at times. But I wanted to tour and play live, while Eric wasn't as interested in that. That was determined long before the Red Hot Chili Peppers started happening for me. We just came to an amicable decision. If we ever want to do something again, the door is always open.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
a Zen Tone review 7 Aug. 2003
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
If you love Janes, it is only too obvious what happened to their sound. Eric Avery was seriously under rated until Rick Rubin produced this album along with Ron Champagne. Had Perry and Steve played on this album it would have been by far the best Janes Addiction album yet. At least up there with Ritual de lo Habitual. The vocals are Avery, not the best, but the composition and lyrical content make up for it. Speaking of the lyrics, they are intelligent, honest, and well thought out.That is what makes this album a long time favorite of mine. It IS honest. A musicians album. This record only goes to show where the majority of Janes rhythm section is at, with due respect to Perkins. I must also make the point that this is some of Navarro's best guitar work. Props to Murphy on the writing as well.
Instrumentals like 'Iris' and 'Kilo' have superb tone. Other highlights on the album included 'LA Song','Single'-just read the singles ad in your town and you can appreciate this one, 'Fire in the Hole', 'Son'-lyrically nails addiction, I watched the same kind of events happen to a close friend, 'America',and 'Wait for History'-another top notch lyrical endeavor.
All in all, I always come back to this album, I never get tired of it, and if that happens it always creeps back into my CD changer. I hope to see a second attempt, at least something by Avery. Well done guys, well done.
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
WOW, 10 years and still great 21 Feb. 2004
By Michael Storey - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
I graduated high school in 1994. I don't have to think very hard about what was released that year in movies and music, my two favorites, Pulp Fiction and Deconstruction. I won't delve into pulp fiction but to this day if i am in a bad mood, all i need is a set of headphones and that dangling engine with a break in the chain. That is it.
I know they will never release another album (God only knows what avery is up to with ol alanis and navarro (lucky guy) is occupied with jane's addiction and carmen electra.) but if the one album is all we get then i say so be it. I could listen to "Big Sur" 1,000 times and never get tired of the bass line and violin sounding guitar. Navarro seems to make his guitar scream in certain songs. And then there are the lyrics, "gone are the dusty gods of duck and cover drills. gone are the dusty gods of echo cathedrals."
Track #2 singles has so much going on in the beginning and end of the song. eric avery is talking while navarro carries this weird melodic background melody. it took me a couple of times to hear this too and i think that's what is great about the album, you hear new things with each listen that you swear you didn't hear the first time around.
Bravo gentleman. I am going to listen to it right now.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Best Album of Eric Avery Ever 19 April 2006
By Daniel Hosp - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Audio CD
This is the best album ever made by members of Jane's Addiction,and probably one of my favourites of the whole history of rock.It is rare for two rockstars to forget everything of The Star System and to try to make an album totally different from what ordinary people is looking for.Here not verse-chorus-verse;just Freedom,Time,and Space.Avery wrote the textes in a cottage in Big Sur where he was to purify his mind from the intoxication of the music business.

Just to compare with another band from same city and times, just have a look to The Red Hot Chili Peppers:they were Stars,and they are still just Stars,at this moment (2006) making the same disgusting verse-chorus-verse songs(songs?).

Jane's Addiction:

-Jane's Addiction 3/5

-Nothing's Shocking 5/5

-Ritual De Lo Habitual 5/5

-Live and Rare 4/5

-Kettle Whistle 5/5

-Strays 2/5


-Deconstruction 6(six!)/5

Polar Bear:

-Chewingum E.P. 5/5

-Why Something Instead of Nothing 5/5

Porno For Pyros:

-Porno For Pyros 1/5

-Good God's Urge 4/5


-Banyan 2/5

-Anytime At All 4/5

-Live At Perkins Palace 3/5

Jane's Addiction Bootlegs:

-Pigs in Zen 3/5

-Live and Profane 5/5

-Trip Away 5/5

-Idiots Rule Vol.1 4/5

-Live and Insane 5/5

-Down in Flames 4/5

-Sex'n'drugs'n'rock'n'roll 5/5

-Last Fixx 5/5

-The Devil Made Me Do It 3/5
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?