- Paperback: 250 pages
- Publisher: Routledge; 1 edition (31 Oct 2002)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 041593950X
- ISBN-13: 978-0415939508
- Product Dimensions: 23.2 x 16.9 x 1.4 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 994,209 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
""Decoding Gender addresses [Science Fiction] issues in powerful ways through its nuanced exploration of both masculine and feminine SF writing traditions. Attebery's wide-ranging but judicious use of feminist theory balances especially nicely with his detailed analyses of individual SF texts; both, in turn, provide fresh perspectives on SF history--or, more accurately, on SF's multiple histories. The concluding chapters convincingly demonstrate why these multiple histories matter....he has given us a way to see them more clearly. Highly recommended."
-Lisa Yaszek, "Extrapolation, Spring 2003
""Decoding Gender's greatest strength is its methodology. Attebery uses cultural theory to play the kind of 'what if' game so near and dear to the collective heart of the SF community. This framing technique is more than just a useful device for decoding gender and genre; it's also quite fun. The 'what if' game also enables Attebery to tell dynamic SF histories that complicate their smooth evolutionary predecessors. Elsewhere, feminist theory provides Attebery with the means to generate new histories across conventional SF periodization. Rather than giving readers a Darwinian tale of the triumph of a single literary species, Attebery depicts the development of SF as a series of complex and sometimes contradictory processes."
-Lisa Yaszek, "Extrapolation, Spring 2003
"This is a thorough examination of the good, the bad, and the ugly in the history of gender representations in science fiction."
- Regina Cross, Journal of the Fantastic of the Arts, 2002
..."a commendable work, a pleasure to read and a source of new insights into the political minefield that gender studies havebecome over the years."
-Donna Spalding Andreolle, Utopian Studies
..."a welcome addition to the list of key texts...that address science fiction's problematic relationship with gender. [I]t is vital precisely because it theorizes gender as a dual system rather than conflating the study of gender with the study of the female."
-Science Fiction Studies, 2004
-Lisa Yaszek, "Extrapolation, Spring 2003
""Decoding Gender's greatest strength is its methodology. Attebery uses cultural theory to play the kind of 'what if' game so near and dear to the collective heart of the SF community. This framing technique is more than just a useful device for decoding gender and genre; it's also quite fun. The 'what if' game also enables Attebery to tell dynamic SF histories that complicate their smooth evolutionary predecessors. Elsewhere, feminist theory provides Attebery with the means to generate new histories across conventional SF periodization. Rather than giving readers a Darwinian tale of the triumph of a single literary species, Attebery depicts the development of SF as a series of complex and sometimes contradictory processes."
-Lisa Yaszek, "Extrapolation, Spring 2003
"This is a thorough examination of the good, the bad, and the ugly in the history of gender representations in science fiction."
- Regina Cross, Journal of the Fantastic of the Arts, 2002
..."a commendable work, a pleasure to read and a source of new insights into the political minefield that gender studies havebecome over the years."
-Donna Spalding Andreolle, Utopian Studies
..."a welcome addition to the list of key texts...that address science fiction's problematic relationship with gender. [I]t is vital precisely because it theorizes gender as a dual system rather than conflating the study of gender with the study of the female."
-Science Fiction Studies, 2004
Product Description
Decoding Gender looks at the ways science fiction writers have incorporated, explored and revised conventional notions of gender. Although the study draws on feminist insights, it is not exclusively devoted to women writers or the treatment of women characters. Instead it examines both men's and women's writing and the question of sexual difference. Begins with science fiction's origins (Mary Shelley's Frankenstein ) and follows to the present day, suggesting new perspectives on the field's best known writers.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
When this project began to take shape, I was surprised to find myself writing a book about gender and science fiction. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
When this project began to take shape, I was surprised to find myself writing a book about gender and science fiction. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
1 review
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
One of the finest critical discussions of SF that I have read
18 Oct 2009
Format:Paperback
This is one of the half dozen best books that I have ever read on SF (along with books like those by Darko Suvin, Tom Moylan, Brian Aldiss, Scott Bukatman, and Fredric Jameson), so the lack of previous reviews for this superb book is inexplicable. There are so many reasons to read this book. Increasingly over the past several decades questions of gender have more and more pressing. Even in the years prior to the publication of THE LEFT HAND OF DARKNESS issues of gender arose even in books that did not consciously address it. No attentive reader of Robert Heinlein could miss the homosocial assumptions undergirding Heinlein's world (even a nonfeminist would have to confess that Heinlein is, to coin a phrase, a sexist porcine). But gender is a more subtle issue than Heinlein's crudities. It is present as an issue even when it is apparently absent. Attebery does as good a job of teasing out the various issues raised by gender as one could wish.
The book does not contained a sustained argument, but instead is a string of tightly connected essays dealing with one or another aspect of gender. And what wonderful essays they are! I value these essays both for the brilliant insights each one shows about SF as a whole but for the in depth discussion of the more specific issue addressed by that particular essay. They proceed roughly in chronological order of the SF being discussed. For instance, the first two essays deal with proto-SF works of the 19th century and many of the SF stories that came out of the pulp era, especially those produced under the editorship of John W. Campbell. Subsequent essays deal with Campbell's obsession with "super men," which most definitely excluded women, and what Attebery terms "wonder women," focusing in the latter especially on the writings of one of my favorite pulp age writers, C. L. Moore. One of my favorite essays explored utopias based upon the exclusion of one gender in favor of the other. Most collections of essays usually have a few that are of less interest than others, but I was impressed by the consistent excellence of these essays.
Like any good book, this one caused me to add a substantial number of new titles to my ever-expanding list of books that I would like to read. But what Attebery had to say both on SF in general and the function of gender coding within it in particular will certainly inform all of my future SF reading. Certainly it is a book that anyone interested in the academic study of SF (though as Attebery quite correctly points out, there are many SF fans who most decidedly do not want to study the genre academically) will want to read and study. As I said, this is without question one of the finest studies of SF published in the past couple of decades.
The book does not contained a sustained argument, but instead is a string of tightly connected essays dealing with one or another aspect of gender. And what wonderful essays they are! I value these essays both for the brilliant insights each one shows about SF as a whole but for the in depth discussion of the more specific issue addressed by that particular essay. They proceed roughly in chronological order of the SF being discussed. For instance, the first two essays deal with proto-SF works of the 19th century and many of the SF stories that came out of the pulp era, especially those produced under the editorship of John W. Campbell. Subsequent essays deal with Campbell's obsession with "super men," which most definitely excluded women, and what Attebery terms "wonder women," focusing in the latter especially on the writings of one of my favorite pulp age writers, C. L. Moore. One of my favorite essays explored utopias based upon the exclusion of one gender in favor of the other. Most collections of essays usually have a few that are of less interest than others, but I was impressed by the consistent excellence of these essays.
Like any good book, this one caused me to add a substantial number of new titles to my ever-expanding list of books that I would like to read. But what Attebery had to say both on SF in general and the function of gender coding within it in particular will certainly inform all of my future SF reading. Certainly it is a book that anyone interested in the academic study of SF (though as Attebery quite correctly points out, there are many SF fans who most decidedly do not want to study the genre academically) will want to read and study. As I said, this is without question one of the finest studies of SF published in the past couple of decades.
Was this review helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
