I'm not one to start criticising other contributors who feel that they must write something about a book on these web pages - I know that I wouldn't like it done to me. However, this well-researched and throrughly entertaining book exposes itself to self-professing 'experts' who have chosen to slate the book due to 'wild-inaccuracies', and/or scientific plausability. I believe that it is unfair to judge 'Decipher' in this way, and remind others, that it is a sci-fi novel who's function is to allow the reader to suspend belief and be entertained.
In this respect, 'Decipher' succeeds brilliantly. Attempting to offer believable possibilities about many of the world's greatest mysteries, such as the Pyramids, Atlantis, Ley lines etc. and marry them all together in the form of an apocalyptic race for time is quite a task, particularly if you consider that this is Pavlou's first novel.
I must admit that from time to time, I di find that the flow of storyline stopped while the author explained a theory in great depth, that sometimes would have only little relevance to the story's proceedings. Also, apart from the central three of four characters, most of the other participants to the story were stereotypical at best. However, they did not overly distract from the book's main focus...to describe a dramatic race to not only solve an ancient conundrum, but to overcome political adversary in the name of preventing a global catastrophe. Think 'Armageddon' coupled with Athur C.Clarke and throw in a touch of Tom Clancy for good measure.
Decipher is a great book for those who like intelligent answers to ancient riddles. Just don't get picky with the scientific explanations, OK?