| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Authors
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.
Product Description
Review
"'Debunking Economics... will transform the way economics is taught and thought.' - Jan Otto Andersson, Professor of Economics, Abo Akademi University, Finland"
Product Description
What is the score card for economics at the start of the new millennium? While there are many different schools of economic thought, it is the neo-classical school, with its alleged understanding and simplistic advocacy of the market, that has become equated in the public mind with economics. This book shows that virtually every aspect of conventional neo-classical economics' thinking is intellectually unsound. Steve Keen draws on an impressive array of advanced critical thinking. He constitutes a profound critique of the principle concepts, theories, and methodologies of the mainstream discipline. Keen raises grave doubts about economics' pretensions to established scientific status and its reliability as a guide to understanding the real world of economic life and its policy-making.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
Why have we handed over the running of the world to economists? Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Why have we handed over the running of the world to economists? Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
For people, like me, who had almost given up entirely on the academic field of Economics when I first started reading on the topic because of ridiculous theories and poor teaching, there is fortunately still Steve Keen. In this book, the Australian Keen shows the errors of the standard views of neoclassical (orthodox) economics.
Not just some side aspects of the theory, but the actual core views of economics as it is taught in universities everywhere unravels before your eyes. Keen masterfully applies both economic models and historical analysis to show that orthodox economists not only do not know what theories exist in their own field, but they also have no inkling of the history of economics and what this means for their approach. This, combined with a possibly even poorer understanding of the philosophy of science (Keen uses Milton Friedman as the main example, but more could have been named), leads to a series of ridiculous assumptions and even more ridiculous results. That the economists consistently ignore the way industrial managers and market analysts etc. do NOT apply their pet theories is just the icing on the cake.
The book is heavy reading for those with no knowledge of economics or maths, but certainly not impossible. A basic understanding of economics and mathematics as taught at high school level (at least in The Netherlands) goes a long way, and Keen fortunately writes well and attempts to avoid long mathematical proofs as much as possible.
The only downside to the book is that his treatment of alternative theories, especially the quite closely linked Austrian school of economics, is very short and vague, and his criticism of Marxist economics is incompetent and useless, done from a Sraffian perspective. This leads to the impression that Keen knows what's wrong with neoclassics, but not what is to be done instead. Therefore, start by reading this book, but don't end there.
Not just some side aspects of the theory, but the actual core views of economics as it is taught in universities everywhere unravels before your eyes. Keen masterfully applies both economic models and historical analysis to show that orthodox economists not only do not know what theories exist in their own field, but they also have no inkling of the history of economics and what this means for their approach. This, combined with a possibly even poorer understanding of the philosophy of science (Keen uses Milton Friedman as the main example, but more could have been named), leads to a series of ridiculous assumptions and even more ridiculous results. That the economists consistently ignore the way industrial managers and market analysts etc. do NOT apply their pet theories is just the icing on the cake.
The book is heavy reading for those with no knowledge of economics or maths, but certainly not impossible. A basic understanding of economics and mathematics as taught at high school level (at least in The Netherlands) goes a long way, and Keen fortunately writes well and attempts to avoid long mathematical proofs as much as possible.
The only downside to the book is that his treatment of alternative theories, especially the quite closely linked Austrian school of economics, is very short and vague, and his criticism of Marxist economics is incompetent and useless, done from a Sraffian perspective. This leads to the impression that Keen knows what's wrong with neoclassics, but not what is to be done instead. Therefore, start by reading this book, but don't end there.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
I bought this book on the understanding that it was written for a "educated lay person"... Educated in what? The Preface was interesting and insightful, but after that I was totally lost. I remember buying a book on economics at the age of 20, but found the subject incomprehensible. Thirty years on, and I still understand nothing of it. This book was disappointment.
If you have some understanding of neoclassical economics, then there MIGHT be SOMETHING (?) in the book for you, otherwise leave well alone (or borrow a copy). Written in 2001, before the current economic breakdown, all I can say is: I'm hardly surprised that current day economists are getting things so horribly wrong. One thing I can understand, and agree with, is Keen's statement that they all deserve the sack.
Keen's style of writing is not for me. Even basic concepts meant little to me. The book is stuffed full of jargon and poorly explained graphs. I guess the subject should stay as academic mumbo-jumbo sudo-science. An introduction to neoclassical economics is clearly an impossible task, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating" and I got a severe dose of indigestion!
If you have some understanding of neoclassical economics, then there MIGHT be SOMETHING (?) in the book for you, otherwise leave well alone (or borrow a copy). Written in 2001, before the current economic breakdown, all I can say is: I'm hardly surprised that current day economists are getting things so horribly wrong. One thing I can understand, and agree with, is Keen's statement that they all deserve the sack.
Keen's style of writing is not for me. Even basic concepts meant little to me. The book is stuffed full of jargon and poorly explained graphs. I guess the subject should stay as academic mumbo-jumbo sudo-science. An introduction to neoclassical economics is clearly an impossible task, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating" and I got a severe dose of indigestion!
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Many years ago while I was studying economics, our tutor group was set an exercise framed as, "given that a firm's cumulative cost/output curve is S-shaped, show that it's average cost vurve is U-shaped". As a mathematics major I chafed at the lack of rigour in the terms "S-shaped" and "U-shaped" and set out to demonstrate that what I was asked to show was not true.
A polite request to my applied maths tutor elicited an old handbook of mathematical functions written in Polish. The Polish was no problem, since I could find what I wanted from the mathematical notation alone. Soon I found a curve based on two exponential functions, each with a parameter. By tweaking the parameters I could generate different S-shaped curves, two of which were of interest. Taking each as a cumulative cost curve, it was easy to show that one led to an average-cost curve that was downward-sloping over most of its domain while the other was upward-sloping over the same domain. Moreover, variation of the parameters enabled me to make the domains of positive or negative average cost curve slope as long as I wished. My conclusion was that what I was asked to prove could easily be false in many practical cases. This attracted the wrath of my economics tutor who duly berated me for being too cocky - and shortly after that I dropped economics as a subject.
Steve Keen's book tells me, after many years, that my scientific instincts about mainstream economics were very well founded. "Debunking Economics" is probably best read in conjunction with a single-volume standard economics textbook. (While I was reading it I referred to "Economics" 3ed by Begg Fisher and Dornbusch.) What Keen shows is that the assumptions unerlying the models used by neoclassical (i.e. mainstream) economics do not correspond to reality (bad science) and that their elaboration often contains logical contradictions (bad mathematics). In fact very little of neoclassical economics stands up to any rigorous scrutiny.
The sad thing about it is that many academic economists know that it's all a mess but have to teach it to students because neoclassical economists dominate in academic departments and economists who investigate models outside the neoclassical paradigm are often unable to get tenured university posts. (This situation parallels that described in relation to physics and string theory in Smolin's "The Trouble With Physics").
Given the extent to which the opinions of economists influence economic policy, this situation is very worrying and Keen has done sceptics a great service in writing this book. It should, IMO, be read by all students of economics, preferably *before* they start their university courses.
All intellectual progress depends on people who are prepared to denounce twaddle. If there were any justice, Keen should have got the Nobel Prize in Economics for this book - because it pulls the rug from under the worthless output of many others who did win it.
A polite request to my applied maths tutor elicited an old handbook of mathematical functions written in Polish. The Polish was no problem, since I could find what I wanted from the mathematical notation alone. Soon I found a curve based on two exponential functions, each with a parameter. By tweaking the parameters I could generate different S-shaped curves, two of which were of interest. Taking each as a cumulative cost curve, it was easy to show that one led to an average-cost curve that was downward-sloping over most of its domain while the other was upward-sloping over the same domain. Moreover, variation of the parameters enabled me to make the domains of positive or negative average cost curve slope as long as I wished. My conclusion was that what I was asked to prove could easily be false in many practical cases. This attracted the wrath of my economics tutor who duly berated me for being too cocky - and shortly after that I dropped economics as a subject.
Steve Keen's book tells me, after many years, that my scientific instincts about mainstream economics were very well founded. "Debunking Economics" is probably best read in conjunction with a single-volume standard economics textbook. (While I was reading it I referred to "Economics" 3ed by Begg Fisher and Dornbusch.) What Keen shows is that the assumptions unerlying the models used by neoclassical (i.e. mainstream) economics do not correspond to reality (bad science) and that their elaboration often contains logical contradictions (bad mathematics). In fact very little of neoclassical economics stands up to any rigorous scrutiny.
The sad thing about it is that many academic economists know that it's all a mess but have to teach it to students because neoclassical economists dominate in academic departments and economists who investigate models outside the neoclassical paradigm are often unable to get tenured university posts. (This situation parallels that described in relation to physics and string theory in Smolin's "The Trouble With Physics").
Given the extent to which the opinions of economists influence economic policy, this situation is very worrying and Keen has done sceptics a great service in writing this book. It should, IMO, be read by all students of economics, preferably *before* they start their university courses.
All intellectual progress depends on people who are prepared to denounce twaddle. If there were any justice, Keen should have got the Nobel Prize in Economics for this book - because it pulls the rug from under the worthless output of many others who did win it.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
A searing attack, but shame about the maths presentation
This review is somewhat late in coming, considering that the second edition of this book has just been launched! Read more
Published 7 months ago by Crno Srce
Debunking Economics
A great book explaining for the interested layperson why economics 'talking heads' should be listened to with skepticism.
Published on 23 April 2010 by jim_burton@systemsunion.com
GREAT BUT HARD
This book is amazing,Keen has compacted in one volume a completeand accurate account and case against the libertairian and free-market fundementalists that plague the established... Read more
Published on 2 Mar 2003 by "fenrisian"
pity sraffa is out of print
interesting review, VERY readable, the guy is a very good writer, i am not an economist so i can't really be dogmatic, but i liked it and believe it would complement well paul... Read more
Published on 14 Feb 2002
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
