Trade in your item
Get a £6.29
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

David Lloyd George: The Great Outsider Hardcover – 16 Sep 2010


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£15.19


Trade In this Item for up to £6.29
Trade in David Lloyd George: The Great Outsider for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £6.29, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Hardcover: 720 pages
  • Publisher: Little, Brown; 1st Edition edition (16 Sep 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1408700972
  • ISBN-13: 978-1408700976
  • Product Dimensions: 16 x 4.4 x 24.1 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 274,827 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

'Some startlingly modern parallels . . . An entertaining and illuminating biography . . . When we come to the lurid drama at the end of 1916, Hattersley is excellent' --Geoffrey Wheatcroft, OBSERVER

'A vivid, comprehensive and timely account of the most remarkable political personality of the last century' --John Campbell, MAIL ON SUNDAY

Book Description

* A brilliant biography of one of our greatest politicians, from the highly acclaimed Roy Hattersley

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

22 of 22 people found the following review helpful By Mr. Gtj Charmley VINE VOICE on 4 Feb 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book has been a long time in the writing. However, reading it, I wonder why. Perhaps the least of its faults is that it has been inadequately proof-read. The number of typos are legion, in some cases several on every page. Sam Evans, for example, becomes Sam Ellis on a number of pages, Northwich Norwich, and so on, to the extent that these interfere with the flow of the narrative.

But this is a minor problem compared to the fact that Hattersley has clearly failed to do some basic research. His account of the 1894-6 Cymru Fydd conroversy, for example, collapses into nonsense when he describes Lloyd George's plans to secure the abolition of the South Wales Liberal Federation as follows:

'The Obstructive South Wales Liberal Federation would be superseded and engulfed by the Rhondda Liberal Association...'

This in all seriousness!! The Rhondda Liberal Association was a constituency association, which belonged to the South Wales Liberal Federation, not a similar, more nationalist body. How Hattersley has developed this idea is frankly beyond me, unless he hasn't thought to check any one of dozens of books on this subject. This speaks of sloppy writing, as well as sloppy thinking.

Equally, the identification of Mabon, MP for the Rhondda, as 'Anti-Nationalist' is to assume that only Lloyd George's version of nationalism was the correct one. Given that Lord Hattersley has been advised by Kenneth Morgan and John Graham Jones, one would expect better. Even if he had not been, there is the assumption that a writer would acquire a proper knowledge of his subject before putting pen to paper.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Geoffrey Woollard VINE VOICE on 3 May 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
I don't really like Lord (Roy) Hattersley. I've never met him and maybe I'm being irrational, but I don't really like Lord Hattersley. This book has not made me like him for, among other things, it exhibits his prejudices and it shows what may be his laziness.

I reckon that David Lloyd George disappointed Hattersley by not, eventually, going over to Labour. I also reckon that Hattersley doesn't approve of Lloyd George's sexual shenanigans. A certain po-faced, politically-correct, middle class, curtain-twitching faux disgust shows through Hattersley's writing. Jack Kennedy's close contemporaries knew full well that the president had always been obsessed with sex. Those contemporaries, in the main, disregarded Kennedy's peccadilloes for they realised that he was greater than his weaknesses. So did Lloyd George's close contemporaries for they realised that he, also, was greater than his weaknesses. Readers will have to make up their own minds about 'The Goat.'

Hattersley's - or somebody else's - laziness exhibits itself in the book by and through the numerous typographical and spelling errors. Somebody - Hattersley or somebody else - should have fixed these errors that are inexcusable in the spell-check age. Errors of fact are also worrying, for one never know that, if one spots one - Abraham Lincoln was not born at Louisville, but near Hodgenville, Kentucky - how many more there are. Not good for stars for an Amazon review.

But, but, but ...
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
19 of 22 people found the following review helpful By Antenna TOP 500 REVIEWER on 25 Oct 2010
Format: Hardcover
"The more things change, the more they stay the same". We see Lloyd George condemning the arms race and immoral wars, such as against the Boers - how would he have applied his razor-sharp scorn to the Iraq War? He campaigned for non-conformist teachers to be allowed to teach in Welsh schools , so presumably would have spoken against faith schools and for Welsh devolution, had he lived today. He foresaw how the embryonic labour party threatened the long-term survival of the liberal party and eventually advocated a "centrist" coalition with the Tories to effect constitutional change. The level of faction-fighting within the Liberal Party foreshadowed what may be about to happen again now. And then there were the issues of Irish independence and the power of the Lords to block legislation, eternal thorns in the flesh of Westminster.

Lloyd George got himself noticed by attacking people through breathtakingly rude yet witty insults, on a scale which would probably be quite unacceptable today. His "weathercock" attitude to many issues makes for confusing reading at times. He opposed votes for women on the practical grounds that this would give the Tories an unfair advantage until suffrage was extended to men without property. This illustrates the ultra-pragmatism which enabled him to negotiate with employers and unions to avert strikes, and bring peace to Ireland - yet always there was his tendency to give different parties different impressions - to the point of appearing to lie - so that "solutions" were too often short-lived.

We are told that LG "felt no loyalty to either institutions or individuals ...yet he remained true ... to a few ideas...
Read more ›
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback