Christine Feehan's first novel, Dark Prince, was first released in 1999 and has now been re-released in a new "Author's Cut Special Edition." I recently had the opportunity to read it. I knew it was one of the early paranormal romances that had shaped the subgenre and its tropes. If I'm not mistaken, this may be the first instance of lifemates who not only don't want to, but physically can't be unfaithful to each other once they forge their mystical bond. Another example is "sequel bait": the hero of this novel is outfitted with a posse of equally hunky, equally angsty brothers and friends who will serve as the heroes of subsequent books.
The domineering nature of the hero, Mikhail, was a huge sticking point for me in the first few chapters. He stomps around demanding obedience from Raven and overriding her will when she doesn't obey. The good news is that this aspect improves. Raven starts standing up to Mikhail and even poking fun at some of his macho posturing, Mikhail takes a metaphorical chill pill and starts to enjoy her teasing, and the book becomes more bearable on the gender-roles front (though Mikhail is still overbearing and Raven still disturbingly weak in some scenes). I often dislike alpha jerks, but I do enjoy heroines who can deflate their self-importance.
Unfortunately, the book is marred by other issues, possibly because the original edition of Dark Prince was Feehan's first novel. The point of view jumps around constantly. I don't know if it's supposed to be third person omniscient or if it's just plain old head-hopping, but it's distracting. The writing is also thick with melodrama and purple prose, especially during the sex scenes: "velvet," "silk," "satin," "lava," and "black magic" figure prominently.
Most problematic, though, is the plot's lack of shape. It moves from sex scene to action scene to sex scene to action scene, and so on, without seeming to build *to* anything in particular. It just sort of *stops*, after a final round of violence followed by sex. If the overall plot arc is supposed to be "Raven and Mikhail fall in love, and they'll probably be facing persecution all their lives," that was resolved well before the ending. If the plot arc is meant to be "Raven is the hope of the Carpathian race because she can stay sane and bear a female child," it's still not resolved after 496 pages. She still teeters on the edge of madness every time something terrible happens, and there's no baby in sight. (I'm not ordinarily a fan of the Baby Epilogue, but it might have gone a long way toward making the book feel "done.")
I haven't read the original edition, so I don't know how much of this meandering quality is due to the re-addition of scenes that were cut the first time around. If that's the reason, though, maybe Dark Prince was better off at a shorter length. After the first few sex/action cycles, it began to feel like a slog. On the other hand, it may be worth reading if you want to know where some of the conventions of paranormal romance originally came from.