We Who Are Dark and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
We Who Are Dark The Philo... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Like New | Details
Sold by Wordery
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: This fine as new copy should be with you within 7-8 working days via Royal Mail.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

We Who Are Dark The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity Paperback – 14 Sep 2007

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£10.41 £11.02
£16.95 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 1 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Product details

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


Shelby dissects the history of black political thought from W.E.B. Du Bois to Malcolm X in order to arrive at a new political philosophy that takes black solidarity as its foundation...Shelby finds merits and flaws in almost every political theory he discusses, leading to an evenhanded, meticulously thought-out argument that builds upon the best elements of black political thought. Publishers Weekly 20050822 A philosophical defense of black political solidarity as a tool for defeating racism, eliminating racial inequality and improving opportunities for those racialized as 'black.' -- Sandra L. Jamison Black Issues Book Review 20050901 Shelby, a rising star who teaches African-American studies at Harvard, argues for black solidarity without black racial identity. If that seems paradoxical at first blush, it won't after you have read this account of black political thought from W.E.B. Du Bois to Malcolm X. -- Jim Holt New York Magazine 20051219 It isn't easy being a philosopher committed to making critical reflections on African-American identity. Those about whom you write have little time for abstractions and even less patience with criticism. The philosophers for whom you write often refuse to take seriously a subject so outlandishly removed from all that has preoccupied them for the past two and a half millenniums. And the experience upon which you reflect is largely bereft of earlier models to build upon. Only a few intrepid souls have plowed this virgin intellectual field. Add to them now Tommie Shelby, a sparkling new talent with all the boldness and intellectual self-assurance necessary for such an effort...Although black Americans have led the way in practical matters, insightful theoretical reflections on identity politics are still wanting. Shelby's We Who Are Dark is respectful of such politics, but severely critical as well. His book contests the movement's central claims at a level of sociophilosophical sophistication that one rarely encounters. -- Orlando Patterson New York Times Book Review 20060108 From his training in political philosophy, Shelby argues that there is a need for black political solidarity as a continuing tool of emancipation. Drawing on the ideas of Martin Delaney, W. E. B. DuBois, Malcolm X, Black Power, and black cultural nationalism, Shelby concludes that the transcending unifying factor now is the "pragmatic nationalist conception of political solidarity." This provocative, stimulating, and readable book can offer a fresh understanding of the virtue of black solidarity and introduce readers to the thinking ways of philosophers. -- J. H. Smith Choice 20060601 On what grounds--and to what ends--are marginalized or oppressed social groups constituted as a group? Specifically, how should those who identify as black in the present-day United States conceive of their sense of solidarity, and what should be the guiding norms of such conception? Tommie Shelby's We Who Are Dark offers a lucid and rigorous treatment of these questions. His argument rests on two initial assumptions: one, that there is indeed a demonstrable sense of solidarity--that is, of "we-ness"--among those who identify as black in North America, and two, that identifying and/or being identified as black in North America is still the basis for continued socio-economic and political oppression, marginalization, and exclusion. The question that follows from these assumptions is whether and how black solidarity could be instrumental in resisting and overcoming such oppression, marginalization, and exclusion...A brief summary such as this fails to do justice to the scope, depth, and elegance of Shelby's argumentation throughout his book. We Who Are Dark makes an important contribution to the field of African-American Studies in particular and political philosophy in general. The sympathetic yet incisive analysis of the problematic aims and assumptions that inform classical nationalism and identity politics is likely to find an audience both within and beyond the circle of scholars with a specific interest in theorizing black identity. Moreover, while Shelby writes from within the dual traditions of mainstream Anglophone philosophy and African-American studies, and constantly enters into dialogue with thinkers from both traditions, he remains an original voice. His thoughtful engagement with thinkers such as Du Bois, Garvey, Delaney, et al, does not merely re-tread the conceptual pathways laid down by them, but mines their work for unacknowledged contradictions and hidden digressions. Despite aligning himself with Rawlsian political liberalism, his book is much more than merely a rehashed version of Rawls. His argument for solidarity for the sake of justice rather than for the sake of maintaining an essential ideal of blackness deserves consideration in its own right. -- Vasti Roodt Ethical Perspectives 20061201 Shelby interprets Black nationalist thinking in six elegant, novel chapters...A progressive notion of Black political solidarity in the post-civil rights era has to come to grips with the unique challenges facing us today. For this reason, We Who Are Dark must be required reading for anyone pragmatically concerned with the future of the souls of Black folk, the souls of a people. -- Neil Roberts Souls The intellectual and strategic moorings of contemporary black political solidarity are increasingly unstable. As the political memory of the race-specific Civil Rights movement fades further into history, intraracial differences that have always existed, such as gender, religion, sexuality, multiracial identification, immigration, region, cultural affiliation, political ideology, and generation, are being highlighted by race scholars from a variety of fields as reasons for rethinking race-based political cohesion. Tommie Shelby acknowledges all of these internal pressures, but sees the widening gap between poor and more affluent blacks as the intraracial fissure that most threatens political cohesion among today's African Americans. From this sociological premise, Shelby sets out to articulate a "progressive," philosophically sound basis for black political organization that appeals both to the class interests of poor and working-class blacks and to those of middleand upper-class blacks. By "progressive," Shelby means a recognition that basic social injustices linger, and can and should be corrected through state intervention and/or collective political action. -- Hawley Fogg-Davis Perspectives on Politics 20060901 An elegant, superb, and timely little book...It immediately secures Shelby's place among the most significant thinkers working at the interface of philosophy and black studies. This groundbreaking work enlarges the field, rethinking our ideas on a variety of matters heretofore understudied but now readied for philosophical analysis...Shelby is of the generation for whom black power was their parents' idea. They can face it with fresh eyes as young intellectuals looking back on received opinion, and here Shelby subjects black nationalism (BN) to searching examination and sometimes withering criticism, even while wanting to believe and defend it by isolating what he sees as its central and strongest claims...Shelby manages to find (or, perhaps, to conjure) the little-noticed liberal hidden within a variety of militant black activists, orators, and authors. Throughout, his tone and style are analytic, measured, soberly realistic, and fair-minded...I think the ultimate value in Shelby's indispensable book may be to help remind us (perhaps unintentionally) that what we mainly need in combating continuing racial injustices against African Americans is a firmer and more clearheaded commitment to justice, not to race or blackness or a supposed nation of African America. -- J. L. A. Garcia Ethics 20080101

About the Author

Tommie Shelby is John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Social Sciences at Harvard University.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 1 review
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful
excellent in many ways 3 Feb. 2014
By A Reader - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This is a really great book, one that does a great job at a few things that philosophy books rarely do. I'll mention three things in particular. First, it's one of the best examples I can think of what I'd call "mid-level theorizing". This is work that operates "below" so called "ideal theory". Most political philosophy works in ideal theory, where several non-actual assumptions are made, most importantly "full compliance"- the assumption that everyone will act as they should if the theory was right. This is not illegitimate, and often necessary, but the transition from ideal theory to the real world is often very unclear. Similarly, the book works "above" the most common kinds of "applied ethics", where particular moral dilemmas are examined. This is a type of work that philosophers tend to not do very well, but Shelby's book is one of the most successful examples I can think of. It does a really good job of showing how considerations of justice can and should work in non-ideal situations without merely resorting to causistry or ad-hoc judgments. This success is, perhaps, related to the second virtue I want to highlight. The book does an excellent job of integrating "social theory", broadly understood to include history, sociology, psychology, literature, etc. with philosophical reflection. This is hard- it's hard to be able to do good work in several fields- but this book does a great job of it. In some ways this might reflect the inherently interdisciplinary nature of Africana studies, but whether that's so or not, it's a model of the good integration of this sort of material into a philosophical text. This sort of integration is probably going to be necessary for really satisfying mid-level theorizing.

Finally, the book is an excellent example of how one an apply, and make use of, what Rawls called "Political Liberalism". In this way it helps show the power and attractiveness of that approach. In this book Shelby doesn't foreground the connection, though he's done this more in his later, more recent work. That's not a criticism- this isn't a book about political liberalism, but rather, I'd say, and example of it.

This book is obviously most likely to be attractive to people interested in philosophical questions about race and justice. It's very good on that score. But, it should be read more generally by people interested in how to do really top-notch political or social philosophy, especially of the "mid-level theorizing" variety.

Finally, I should note that the writing is consistently clear and enjoyable. It's not overly technical, and no deep background in philosophy is presupposed, but it's not over-simplified, either. This is one more clear virtue of the book. Over all, it's just a really well done job, and highly recommended.
Was this review helpful? Let us know