The book appears to make an attempt at a balanced view but every now and then the facts get somewhat questionable. It is fairly well documented with some notable omissions, eg the statement that 38% of the land belonged to Turkish Cypriots. The source of such a controversial figure would be important to provide.
Certain references are made to subsequent or previous events without providing dates, making the narrative confusing. Without previous knowledge of the history of Cyprus, it would be hard to figure out the timeframe referred to.
The book is also in need of editorial care: it has a large number of grammatical errors and typos. The most notable is at the bottom of page 19 where the date when "Britain concluded a treaty with Turkish Sultan Abdul Hamid II" is given as 1978 instead of 1878!
But I concurred (sadly) with some of the author's descriptions of modern Cypriot society (particularly in the south with which I'm familiar), as well as with the conclusion that the differences between the two sides - at least at the official level - appear to be irreconcilable, and that the only hope is at the grassroots level where there is a need to start building a Cypriot identity and consciousness, if we ever want to see the divide go away...