Oh dear. where to start?
I guess it is an inescapable fact that our lives have changed and are changing at a time of breath-takingly fast technological change. All sorts of questions arise, are we changing because of the technology, or is the technology now able to deliver to our constantly shifting aspirations? How well was this forseen, as in, those who now seem to be at the top of the heap, was it their planning, luck, zeitgeist ... even then, technological brilliance, business acumen simply understanding how we humans want to interact? these are all questions which probably flash through most of our minds, along with many others, and it would be nice to think there are answers that we could understand, and even emulate or capitalise on.
Nice to think, but probably it will never unravel in such a simple way! Still, the debate is interesting and will continue ad infinitum. Sadly this book doesn't belong in that debate, it has nothing much to offer, besides a load of very familiar sounding waffle that goes on at the side lines of any fast-paced development in society.
Finding a few people who, decades back, predicted machines would be much more part of our lives and easier to use could ... at a stretch ... be called prophetic, it does not mean those people had anything causal to do with what is going on now, and so all the other stuff they blithered on about doesn't apply, unless you can find proper evidence of links. All we get anecdotes and a meandering biographical journey across "cybernetics", the ever shifting sands of radical anarcho/left movements, ayn rand and god knows what else. The "internet" did not start because some group of activitists got a bit bored with party politics, couldn't make a magazine work, and so learned to write web pages, and so their life history is just one narrow and very tangentially relevant part. It was not conceived by a bloke who back in WW2 had some daft idea about intelligence-guided weapons (a nut we still haven't cracked, if you chop through the hype). There's certainly a lot more to it than DARPAnet, the academic adoption and then google and facebook and so forth (the more conventional histories of the internet you will read), but to tell us about the rest, you'd need to do a lot more than tell a story about how you came to first logon and your world view around then.
This all reads more like some political blog morphing into a cult bible. I got the book after someone referred to it on TheRegister, I now think they were being ironic. I'll be honest, I got about halfway through and just gave up hoping anything of use was hidden in all the dreck. One day I might finish it off and then come back and withdraw this review because the last page was good. Who knows?
Oh, and the author's use of long words and overly twisted grammatical constructs are even worse than mine. You have been warned.