This book is possibly unique in its choice of scope, apparently targeted at operational-level military cyber warfare professionals (though also seemingly attempting to broaden its audience to mid-level private-sector information security professionals). Since this is basically the exact audience I was hoping to target as an instructor for a course in operational cyber war, I had high hopes for this book, hoping to replace an array of texts each covering a slice of the subject matter. It helped that the authors appeared to have solid credentials. All in all, I was somewhat disappointed with the book, mostly with the lack of polish, though it's probably still worthwhile if you're looking for a book with this particular scope.
"Cyber Warfare" addresses the nature of the various threats in cyberspace, covering various actors, motives, methods, vulnerabilities, and potential effects. It does a good job of staying at a fairly high level without over-simplifying to the point of gross inaccuracy, though it does fall victim to the temptation of sensationalizing once in awhile.
The book doesn't go too far into the weeds with specific tools, only offering a basic familiarization with the purpose and functionality of some of the more well-known (and sometimes outdated) examples. You occasionally get a sense of "hey, look at this cool gee-whiz tool" with some of their selections, but in general, it serves as a good survey of potential inclusions in a security toolkit.
Operations are structured along the lines of military doctrine, addressing Computer Network Attack, Defense, and Exploitation with their own chapters. Personnel and training, as well as legal and ethical issues are also discussed at some length-- these are all good topics for a professional military education course, and not necessarily obvious inclusions, so kudos to the authors for that. That said, the legal section could probably use a bit more development in the arena of international law, as that would be the primary concern of true cyber warfare.
I didn't feel like the book did a good job addressing theory, though one could argue that this wasn't its focus (after all, the subtitle is "Techniques, Tactics, and Tools", leaving out the other "T"). I was almost ready to give up on the book after the first two chapters (largely due to the glaring lack of polish discussed below), but fortunately it eventually settles into a more comfortable rhythm.
Now, I have a lot of nit picks with the book, but I don't want to give the impression that it's trash. I'd probably give it 3.5 stars if the rating system had that level of fidelity.
The most obvious flaw is that the writers don't do a very good job of projecting credibility given the terrible writing in many places in the book. While there are very few clear factual errors (e.g., "the latest, at the time of this writing, microSDXC cards topping out at 2 terabytes of storage", the assertion that most companies protect critical servers to the same level as workstations), they're generally minor, but the entire book is littered with assorted mechanical errors and poor wording. Using "that" in place of "than" happens frequently, along with many other random typos/autocorrects that simple spellcheck can't catch, like "effeteness" in place of "effectiveness", and "reverses [the network]" in place of what I assume is "observes [the network]" (regarding government network monitoring). Many of their illustrations and diagrams are also either poor quality or useless/unilluminating. All in all, the book seems to lack polish, and at least one of the co-authors could really use extensive help from a good editor-- shame on Syngress for that one, since techies aren't often expected to be great writers.
Another issue I have with the book is that the authors don't seem to have a very good feel for realistic and meaningful military effects in the cyber domain. Many of their attack techniques focus on simple denial of service that is of little real usefulness to a military audience at any level. They include several "cute" tricks like directing /dev/zero to a file in order to fill up a file system. While I suppose those sorts of tactics could conceivably be applied as a kind of field expedient in some unlikely scenario, they're not really worth mentioning to the audience targeted by the book. In general, when they get specific with attack techniques, they're often rather unsophisticated. They'd be better off sticking to a more high-level approach centered around effects.
Along with the "look what I can do" sense of many of their attack techniques, the fact that they decide it's worthwhile to include the word "noob" multiple times in the book (along with other terms of debatable relevance) and bother to discuss "l33tsp34k" also seems like a strained attempt to seem up-to-date with the cool kids. It doesn't help that they reference Die Hard 4 with an apparently straight face.
Some of their other topic coverage seems a bit naïve and shallow as well. For example, they perpetuate the notion that cyber-terrorism (in the sense of network-based attacks on critical infrastructure to induce fear and chaos by non-state actors) is a serious threat, when in actuality, physical attack is much more effective and practical for terrorist groups' ends and means, and there has been little evidence that they've been seriously pursuing a cyber avenue of attack (they presumably discovered just how much specialized knowledge they'd have to develop in order to mount a meaningful attack). These mitigating factors aren't mentioned in their discussion.
Granted, if they don't want the book to balloon to unmanageable lengths, they can't go into depth with every topic, given the scope of the work. But this makes the inclusion of many questionably-relevant topics that much more puzzling. For example, the book includes discussion of lockpicking (and counters), interrogation techniques, and other purely physical security concerns, which, while in a sense relevant to information security, seem out of place in this particular book, at least to the level of treatment they receive.
Again, with all that said, this book does have substantial utility. I may still recommend its use in our next course offering (albeit wincing at its amateurish presentation) due to its rather unique scope and focus. A lot of work clearly went into putting it together, and they hit pretty much every topic you'd like to see in a book aimed at this audience, addressing them reasonably effectively. I'm hoping there's a second edition (maybe from a different publisher) that smoothes out the rough edges in presentation and includes more discussion of the recent Stuxnet worm that clearly has major relevance in this field.