Arnold Yasin Mol
The Humanistic Approach vs. the Religious Approach
How the Focus Matters
Article published in Critical Thinkers for Islamic Reform, Edip Yuksel, Arnold Mol, Faruk A. Peru Editors, Brainbow Press, 2009.
Reviewed by Joseph Codsi
This is the article I liked best in the entire collection of articles published under the umbrella title, "Critical Thinkers for Islamic Reform". The article consists in going over a series of Quranic passages where the spiritual and universal dimension of Islam is discussed. This is highly selective. As can be expected, it leaves out of the picture the other side of the Quran, where the religious requirements are discussed. Here is one of the passages that are selected:
Wealth and children are the joys of the life of this world. But good deeds that fulfill the needs of others, their fruit endures forever. Such actions are of far greater merit in the sight of your Lord, and the best foundation of hope. (Quran 18;46)
This passage illustrates what Mol calls the "humanistic approach". How does this humanistic approach differ from the religious approach? I think Mol answers this question in the following statement:
Throughout the Quran it is made clear people are judged on their conduct towards other people, not on their amount of worship. (page 176)
I think that all religions have two dimensions, a spiritual one and a religious one. The religious dimension is that of religion as an institution endowed with a specific faith, special rituals and legal requirements. The spiritual dimension, on the other hand, transcends the human institution. Because of this, there is a tension between the two dimensions. Institutions tend to emphasize the requirement of submission to their directives. Those who do not comply are rejected.
Mol has the merit of reminding the readers that many passages of the Quran emphasize the humanistic requirements and seem to ignore the religious requirements. He does not say so openly, but I think that he gives priority to the spiritual and humanistic requirements over the religious ones.
Seattle, June 30, 2010
I sent this review to Mr. Mol and asked him to comment on it. Here is what he had to say:
"Thank you for your review and that you liked my article the most. My only comment is on your last sentence:
He does not say so openly, but I think that he gives priority to the spiritual and humanistic requirements over the religious ones.
This is not true, if you look at my article, even the title, I clearly say that I believe the Quran puts humanism above religiosity. That is the whole point of my article. This is also why I do not ignore the religious points in the Quran, I focus on the humanistic verses to show how dominant they are.
You quote my sentence of page 176, but then say I ignore the religious side. From the quote you can see clearly that I do not ignore them, but that I want to prove that they are lesser then the humanistic message of the Quran. So your comment is a contradiction with the quote."