I find this book extremely well-written and extremely well-researched. It is really nice to read a "true crime" book of such outstanding quality. However, there is one big problem: the author is absolutely convinced of Edith Thompsons innocence. Accordingly, he fails to provide a proper analysis of the evidence in the case. The author tells us, as if it was an undisputed fact, that all allusions on poisoning her husband in E.T:s letters are pure fantasies. This is a matter of interpretation, is it not? Also, the author reveals his ignorance of forensic medicine when he states that Spilsburys evidence completely ruled out any possibility of poisoning. On the contrary, it was quite correct of Inskip to say that it couldn't be ruled out that for instance glass had been administered several months ago. Of course glass could have been given in the food (in small pieces, naturally) and then passed through the intestinal canal without causing any damage detectable many months later. Unfortunatley, Mr Weis is not on firm ground here which lowers the overall judgment. Nevertheless, this is a very interesting and moving book which is worthwile reading just for the literary quality.