Let's face it, it's a daunting task attempting to dramatise this extraordinary and complex novel. And this is not a bad attempt. It's not a great attempt either. It looks low budget. I'd love to see a big budget production.
Raskolnikov's crime is graphically illustrated in all its gory awfulness. It really 'looks' shocking. More shocking than in the novel.
Real violence is always disgusting and the scene of the axe murders made me turn my head away. I couldn't watch it. The victims, particularly the pathetic Lizaveta, look vulnerable and pathetic. Authentic but sickening reality.
Simm is a good actor and he is convincing but he is never the Heathcliffesque character I envisaged from the book. He is somehow not brooding or even brutally handsome enough.
Porfiry Petrovitch is masterfully acted by Iain McDiarmid. It is not an easy role. Dounia and Sonia are weakly portrayed, but it might be said they are weak, unconvincing characters by Dostoevsky's standards. Perhaps that is too harsh. The long suffering Sonia reminds me of Mary Magdalene to Raskolnikov's anti-Christ.
But for me the revelation was Svidrigailov, played by Nigel Terry. Here we see the contrast between the high thinking 'good' man, Raskolnikov, who brutally murders in cold blood for a notion of greatness; and the morally corrupt, nefarious low man, Svidrigailov, who is willing to sacrifice himself just to be loved. The good man shuns love and kills; the bad man kills himself for love. The good man gives charity to imagine himself great and powerful, the bad man gives away his fortune to poor orphans and seeks no reward and no thanks. It precisely begs the question: 'who is good and who is bad? and who are we to judge so readily?'
And the immoral man, Svidgailov, has the courage to commit suicide for his transgressions, but the 'extraordinary' and 'great' man, Raskolnikov, does not.
Interestingly the ending differs from the book. In the novel R gets a ludicrously light sentence, 7 years in Siberia, and converts to Christianity. In this adaptation he does not find God.
I always thought an alternative ending might be for a fellow prisoner to give R the chop! The conclusion is unsatisfactory on so many levels, but I presume the author was displaying his belief that a repentant sinner should be forgiven. Dostoevsky was ultimately a religious man.
The whole production does look like it was made on the cheap but saying that it was realistic and redolent of 1866 with all the concomitant horrors of disease and poverty.
And the acting is, by and large, excellent.
Well worth watching.
JP :)