Our viewpoints on religion often have the danger of becoming parochial and trapped in an echo chamber - especially for those who take a less than scholarly approach to belief. This book gives us an excellent antidote as it provides an entire spectrum of beliefs running from Catholic, Islamic, and Jewish orthodoxy to thoroughgoing naturalism. From liberal to conservative perspectives, reform to traditional positions, antipathetic to sympathetic, there are few viewpoints left out.
This human phenomenon we call religion that can be very hard to nail down with a definition (the interviewer asks every thinker in this book and they almost all admit that conclusively defining religion is practically impossible) but we can glide toward something of a working idea of what we mean simply by looking at a healthily populated list. And this book allows us to understand what religion means to many people who have many differing beliefs.
The format of the book is to gather some of the leading thinkers on religion and to interview them. While the questions asked tend to be general, the answers are nearly all excellent and substantive.
We learn why leading atheists like A. C. Grayling and Richard Dawkins think religion is nonsense.
We learn how and why scientists like Alister McGrath and Fraser Watts still find religious belief warranted.
We learn how and why a theologian and ordained priest like Don Cupitt candidly identifies as an atheist.
We learn from devout Muslims like Azzam Tamimi and Shalina Janmohamed about the controversial issues such as the Islamic stance on terrorism and the state of women in Muslim society.
All of the contributors here are worthwhile to read in this context of a conversation, even if there are obnoxious and immature views expressed (Ann Widdecombe being the best example). But that is the value of this resource; there certainly are many, many people who have an obnoxious and immature understanding of religion and by understanding them better, we can understand the world better.