- Hardcover: 154 pages
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press; 1 edition (27 Oct 1988)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0521356482
- ISBN-13: 978-0521356480
- Product Dimensions: 21.6 x 13.8 x 1.7 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,351,427 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
'… an intellectual breakthrough which, like it or not, will influence all our thinking in the future … Brief though it is, the book makes a profound impression. Much research will be necessary to extend and modify it, but here undoubtedly is a major contribution of our time.' Sidney Pollard, Economic History Review
'General history is often interesting, but rarely important and searching. Continuity, Chance and Change succeeds on all three counts.' Julian Hoppit, Times Higher Education Supplement
'General history is often interesting, but rarely important and searching. Continuity, Chance and Change succeeds on all three counts.' Julian Hoppit, Times Higher Education Supplement
Product Description
The Industrial Revolution brought into being a distinct world, a world of greater affluence, longevity and mobility, an urban rather than a rural world. But the great surge of economic growth was balanced against severe constraints on the opportunities for expansion, revealing an intriguing paradox. This book, published to considerable critical acclaim, explores the paradox and attempts to provide a distinct model' of the changes that comprised the industrial revolution.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
In the mid-sixteenth century England's peripheral location at the edge of continental Europe was symbolically appropriate both demographically and economically. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
In the mid-sixteenth century England's peripheral location at the edge of continental Europe was symbolically appropriate both demographically and economically. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
The industrial revolution is, surprisingly, a cutting edge historical subject. Views on it are being revised constantly, especially based on newly-computed economic and demographic data. In particular, notions of a dramatic shift compressed in the 1780-1830 period have now been dismissed in favour of longer-term up-trends. Received wisdom on pre-industrial extended families and early marriage has also been dispelled, and the nuclear family shown to have been the rule long before.
Wrigley's short book, or long essay, is a well-articulated statement of the factors behind the industrial revolution. His theory is that it consisted of two separate phenomena: the perfection of an advanced organic economy and a shift to a mineral-based energy economy. That these were coincidental is shown by comparison with the Dutch economy, which ceased growing in the eighteenth century. Organic economies were bounded because of competition for land resources: raw materials such as wool, charcoal for heating and industry, fodder for animal power, food. Gains could be achieved through trade, investment, and specialisation, but marginal returns would decrease as pressure grew on the land. Mineral energy, namely coal, enabled these limits to be overcome, though it only became dominant as a factor in the early-to-mid nineteenth century (with the steam engine and railways).
Wrigley's position, though conceptually original, remains based on up-to-date empirical work by other historians. His book is short and does not purport to contain exhaustive data on the industrial revolution, or even an exhaustive analysis. But it is convincing (his analysis squares impressively with the otherwise baffling pessimism of classical economists such as Ricardo or even Adam Smith) and an excellent introduction to the topic.
Wrigley's short book, or long essay, is a well-articulated statement of the factors behind the industrial revolution. His theory is that it consisted of two separate phenomena: the perfection of an advanced organic economy and a shift to a mineral-based energy economy. That these were coincidental is shown by comparison with the Dutch economy, which ceased growing in the eighteenth century. Organic economies were bounded because of competition for land resources: raw materials such as wool, charcoal for heating and industry, fodder for animal power, food. Gains could be achieved through trade, investment, and specialisation, but marginal returns would decrease as pressure grew on the land. Mineral energy, namely coal, enabled these limits to be overcome, though it only became dominant as a factor in the early-to-mid nineteenth century (with the steam engine and railways).
Wrigley's position, though conceptually original, remains based on up-to-date empirical work by other historians. His book is short and does not purport to contain exhaustive data on the industrial revolution, or even an exhaustive analysis. But it is convincing (his analysis squares impressively with the otherwise baffling pessimism of classical economists such as Ricardo or even Adam Smith) and an excellent introduction to the topic.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
1 review
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Cogent and up-to-date
12 Jan 2010
Format:Paperback
The industrial revolution is, surprisingly, a cutting edge historical subject. Views on it are being revised constantly, especially based on newly-computed economic and demographic data. In particular, notions of a dramatic shift compressed in the 1780-1830 period have now been dismissed in favour of longer-term up-trends. Received wisdom on pre-industrial extended families and early marriage has also been dispelled, and the nuclear family shown to have been the rule long before.
Wrigley's short book, or long essay, is a well-articulated statement of the factors behind the industrial revolution. His theory is that it consisted of two separate phenomena: the perfection of an advanced organic economy and a shift to a mineral-based energy economy. That these were coincidental is shown by comparison with the Dutch economy, which ceased growing in the eighteenth century. Organic economies were bounded because of competition for land resources: raw materials such as wool, charcoal for heating and industry, fodder for animal power, food. Gains could be achieved through trade, investment, and specialisation, but marginal returns would decrease as pressure grew on the land. Mineral energy, namely coal, enabled these limits to be overcome, though it only became dominant as a factor in the early-to-mid nineteenth century (with the steam engine and railways).
Wrigley's position, though conceptually original, remains based on up-to-date empirical work by other historians. His book is short and does not purport to contain exhaustive data on the industrial revolution, or even an exhaustive analysis. But it is convincing (his analysis squares impressively with the otherwise baffling pessimism of classical economists such as Ricardo or even Adam Smith) and an excellent introduction to the topic.
Wrigley's short book, or long essay, is a well-articulated statement of the factors behind the industrial revolution. His theory is that it consisted of two separate phenomena: the perfection of an advanced organic economy and a shift to a mineral-based energy economy. That these were coincidental is shown by comparison with the Dutch economy, which ceased growing in the eighteenth century. Organic economies were bounded because of competition for land resources: raw materials such as wool, charcoal for heating and industry, fodder for animal power, food. Gains could be achieved through trade, investment, and specialisation, but marginal returns would decrease as pressure grew on the land. Mineral energy, namely coal, enabled these limits to be overcome, though it only became dominant as a factor in the early-to-mid nineteenth century (with the steam engine and railways).
Wrigley's position, though conceptually original, remains based on up-to-date empirical work by other historians. His book is short and does not purport to contain exhaustive data on the industrial revolution, or even an exhaustive analysis. But it is convincing (his analysis squares impressively with the otherwise baffling pessimism of classical economists such as Ricardo or even Adam Smith) and an excellent introduction to the topic.
Was this review helpful?
Let us know
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Business, Finance & Law > Biographies & Histories > Business & Economic History
- Books > Business, Finance & Law > Economics
- Books > Business, Finance & Law > Management
- Books > Business, Finance & Law > Professional Finance
- Books > History > Britain & Ireland > Industrial Revolution
- Books > History > Cultural History
- Books > History > Social & Economic History > Industrialisation
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
