Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare ? and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
  • RRP: £10.99
  • You Save: £0.31 (3%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 4 left in stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Contested Will: Who Wrote... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Expedited shipping available on this book. The book has been read but remains in clean condition. All pages are intact and the cover is intact. Some minor wear to the spine.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare ? Paperback – 6 Jan 2011


See all 7 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
£10.68
£2.19 £1.03
£10.68 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 4 left in stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare ? + 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare + Soul of the Age: The Life, Mind and World of William Shakespeare
Price For All Three: £33.44

Buy the selected items together


Free One-Day Delivery for six months with Amazon Student


Product details

  • Paperback: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Faber & Faber; Main edition (6 Jan. 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0571235778
  • ISBN-13: 978-0571235773
  • Product Dimensions: 12.6 x 2.8 x 19.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (49 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 273,212 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

The case for Shakespeare is made cogently and convincingly. Shapiro cites contemporaries who identified him as the author of the plays, and show that the early printing history corroborates the attribution ... Shapiro weaves together various strands of recent scholarship to make a case which is about as watertight as it can be ... Shapiro illuminatingly assimilates the authorship controversy to radical theories about the non-existence of Homer as an individual author, and about the mythic nature of the Gospels ... Shapiro is a gifted storyteller. (LRB)

Authoritative, lucid and devastatingly funny, and its brief concluding statement of the case for Shakespearer is masterly. (John Carey The Sunday Times)

Shapiro sprinkles his text with glinting, steely facts ... Riveting ... Shapiro does not waste words on the preposterous, but he does uncover the mechanism of fantasy and projection that go to make up much of the case against Shakespeare. His books lays bare, too, assumptions about the writing life that come to us from the 18th-century romantics. those who make Shakespeare a demi-god have much to answer for. (Hilary Mantel Guardian, Book of the Week)

The application of Shapiro's detective skills to the piles of pseudo-scholarship from the past century and a half yields valuable results. Contested Will isn't just the most intelligent book on the topic for years, but a re-examination of the documentary evidence offered on all sides of the question ... Contested Will is a terrific read. (Financial Times)

A follow-up more original that his earlier success ... [Shapiro's] imaginative enquiry never the less joins the show shelf of essential books on the subject ... Contested Will is a serious, interesting an doriginal book about how shakespeare's genius can dominate the imagination ... Illuminating. (Daily Telegraph)

[Shapiro's] contribution to exposing those who still want to deny that Shakespeare was Shakespeare is deadly effective in another way: he helps us understand them better. (Evening Standard)

In Contested Will, James Shapiro cooly considers and then deftly dismantles the belief that Shakespeare did not write his own plays. This irresistable book hums with all the learning and panache that made Shapir's 1599 such a treat. No one has ever expalined so well the motives and reasons for the bit lie of the the "authorship controversy" ... As his book genially but forcefully proves, the "authorship controversy" is a ghost-train. (Independent)

Mr Shapiro teases our the cultural prejudices, the historical blind spots, and above all the anachronism inherent in these questions ... Contested Will is dense with lives and stories and argument. It is also entertaining ... A brilliant defence of the man from Stratford. Piece by piece, Mr Shapiro builds the case ... the Shakespeare that emerges is both simple and mysterious: a man of the theatre, who read, observed, listened and remembered. Beyond that is imagination. In essence, that's what the book is about. (Economist)

Entertaining. (Sunday Express)

Shapiro's approach is quite different. His interest is not so much in 'what people think' as in 'why they think it', and he often sheds powerful light on the social and religious contects in which scepticism about shakespeare has flourished. shapiro has a remarkable gift for empathy with his human subjects, and is curious and tenacious in exploring their life stories ... The study is book-ended with excellent resumes of Shakespeare scholarship. (Literary Review)

This wily, absorbing study ... It does matter who wrote Shakespeare, because the case Shapiro makes for him doubles as a defence of art. (Observer)

There is fascinating new research in Contested Will, whereby Shapiro aims his question - why did they believe this ridiculous conspiracy theory? - at a number of distinguished anti-Stratfordians. In every case, his answer is psychologically intriguing and entirely convincing. (Sunday Telegraph)

Fascinating book on people's obsessive need to identify the 'real' Shakespeare ... Shapiro has great tracing the intellectual and psychological impulses. (Mail on Sunday)

James Shapiro is too expert and too courteous a scholar to descend into a cantankerous cataloguing of the basic flaws in the anti-Stratfordian argument. He certainly thinks the argument is wrong, as his new study of the controversy makes clear, and he offers precise reasons why William Shakespeare of Stratford is really the only cogent candidate for authorship ... This is essentially a historiographical study of the controversy, looking at the cultural contexts of its emergence and evolution, and at the lives, circumstances, agendas and pathologies of those who have contributed to it. It is also unlike most other books on the subject because it is a pleasure to read. Like its splendid predecessor, 1599: A year in the life of William Shakespeare (2005), it is briskly paced, cleverly detailed, elegantly argued, and never forgets that for all the complexities and quiddities of the material, the writing of history is essentially the telling of a story (or in this case, the story of a story) ... With this inquisitive and open-minded account of the controversy, James Shapiro has done a service to both camps, and indeed to that mysteriously talented glover's son from the Midlands who is at the heart of it all. (Charles Nicholl TLS)

A scholarly work as riveting as a detective story. (Philip French Observer)

Book Description

Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? is James Shapiro's investigation into who wrote Shakespeare's plays, from the bestselling author of 1599.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

47 of 51 people found the following review helpful By Terrace Ghost on 27 Jun. 2010
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
If his supporters are correct, the 17th Earl of Oxford would not have been surprised to have been contacted over 300 years after his death and asked how he managed to write the Complete Works of Shakespeare without anybody finding out. In fact, as of course befits the aristocracy, the Earl was most accommodating and even invited the spirit of William Shakespeare along to help explain how they did it. Even better, Oxford produced some new verse in the same style to demonstrate. At this point Shapiro notes, sadly, that the Earl's posthumous compositions weren't really up to Shakespearian standards.

He takes a similar approach throughout this excellent book. To take on the conspiracy theorists (I refuse to call them Anti-Stratfordians), James Shapiro gives them what they ask for and takes them seriously, explaining not just their viewpoint but the underlying assumptions that got them there. Knowing all the while, of course, that by doing so he will be allowing them to start holding séances with deceased noblemen, claiming that the Earl of Oxford was the son and incestuous lover of Queen Elizabeth on whom he fathered the Earl of Southampton or indulging in spectacular feats of circular logic:
"Why is there no mention of the plays being written by someone else?"
"It was such common knowledge that no one ever mentioned it"
"How can you tell?"
"By the fact that nobody ever mentioned it"
The only thing that rattles him at all is the increasingly prevalent belief in our culture that "balance" and "impartiality" bestow the right of equal coverage on any theorist who shouts loud enough regardless of the sanity of their theory.

Fortunately, this is not a book which wastes its time examining the detailed claims of Oxfordians and others.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
63 of 70 people found the following review helpful By Diacha on 18 April 2010
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Professor James Shapiro's "Contested Will" is an entertaining and scholarly romp through the history of the dispute about who wrote Shakespeare's plays.

Shapiro writes with commanding authority - his scholarship is evident throughout, down to the very minutiae of such things as Elizabethan typesetting practices - and with a storyteller's natural gift. And this is a great story to tell: full of cranks, skullduggery,large egos and big guns.

The debate over authorship began in earnest in the second half of the nineteenth century. The paucity of detailed knowledge of Shakespeare's life and the apparent irreconcilability of what little was known with the erudition and aristocratic voice of the plays led many to question whether this "third-rate play actor" could really have authored such works of genius. A cast of rather obsessive individuals stepped in to advocate a broad range of alternative authors. Shapiro focuses mainly on two: Francis Bacon, whose cause was espoused by the American teacher Delia (no relation) Bacon and the 17th Earl of Oxford, advanced by failed sect preacher, J.T. Looney. Many eminent people subscribed to the cause of one or other claimant: Twain, Helen Keller, Freud, James, Orson Welles, various U.S. Supreme Court justices, Derek Jacobi and Mark Rylance among them.

Shapiro himself is a convinced Stratfordian. In "Contested Will," he patiently and respectfully (for example, he pre-empts sniggers about nominative determinism by explaining that Looney's family name is pronounced to rhyme with "boney") unpicks the arguments for the main pretenders.
Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
15 of 17 people found the following review helpful By Steven on 2 April 2011
Format: Paperback
Shapiro's earlier book, 1599, was a work of genius. I approached Contested Will with a little more caution, however - the hook seemed less obvious, the trail and approach possibly a bit too scholarly, academic and dry for my tastes. Where 1599 was all about Shakespeare, his plays and that specific year, the whole point to Contested Will seemed to be that old Shakey might not even be there.

But the scheme of the book is logical and, after a slow start, quite compelling. Shapiro sets out his stall by examining how historians and critics first came to question the available evidence of Shakespeare's existence and the authenticity of the plays. After that he lays bare the history of the two most prominent counter-claimants - Bacon and Oxford - before weighing in with his own evidence for the Bard. While the arguments and beliefs of people such as Freud, Twain, Keller and the (unfortunately-named) Looney are fascinating in themselves, and Shapiro's own wry commentary on those beliefs is priceless, without Shakespeare's own presence in the narrative there does seem to be something lost from the core of the book.

What I do firmly agree with is Shapiro's rubbishing of the theory (developed most strongly by Keller and Twain) that an author can only "write what he knows" - that imagination is unimportant or irrelevant, and that Shakespeare, as an upstart from the shires rather than a court-educated nobleman, could not have possessed the breadth of knowledge to write on such a variety of subjects.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews



Feedback