Start reading Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here or start reading now with a free Kindle Reading App.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.
Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare?
 
 

Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? [Kindle Edition]

James Shapiro
4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (43 customer reviews)

Print List Price: £10.99
Kindle Price: £5.09 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £5.90 (54%)
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £5.09  
Hardcover £16.12  
Paperback £8.79  
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged £17.77  

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Purchase any Kindle Book sold by Amazon.co.uk and receive £1 credit to try out our Digital Music Store. Here's how (terms and conditions apply)


Product Description

Review

'I devoured this book. Shapiro guides us through this strange history with a beguiling mixture of scepticism and sympathy. Packed with many fine pen-portraits, it's a timely contribution to a vexed debate.' --Simon Russell Beale

'Shapiro's book is… authoritative, lucid and devastatingly funny, and its brief concluding statement of the case for Shakespeare is masterly.' --Peter Carey, Sunday Times

'Unlike most other books on the subject ... it is a pleasure to read. Like its splendid predecessor, 1599: A year in the Life of William Shakespeare (2005), it is briskly paced, cleverly detailed, elegantly argued, and never forgets that for all the complexities and quiddities of the material, the writing of history is essentially the telling of a story (or in this case, the story of a story).' --Charles Nicoll, Times Literary Supplement

'A lucid, often funny examination.' --Sunday Times

'Unlike most other books on the subject ... it is a pleasure to read. Like its splendid predecessor, 1599: A year in the Life of William Shakespeare (2005), it is briskly paced, cleverly detailed, elegantly argued, and never forgets that for all the complexities and quiddities of the material, the writing of history is essentially the telling of a story (or in this case, the story of a story).' --Charles Nicoll, Times Literary Supplement

Book Description

From the bestselling author of 1599, an investigation into who wrote Shakespeare's plays

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 1055 KB
  • Print Length: 383 pages
  • Page Numbers Source ISBN: 057123576X
  • Publisher: Faber & Faber Non Fiction (19 Sep 2011)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B003O2SCTC
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (43 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #151,274 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?


More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
44 of 48 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars An Alarming Triumph for Obvious Common Sense 27 Jun 2010
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
If his supporters are correct, the 17th Earl of Oxford would not have been surprised to have been contacted over 300 years after his death and asked how he managed to write the Complete Works of Shakespeare without anybody finding out. In fact, as of course befits the aristocracy, the Earl was most accommodating and even invited the spirit of William Shakespeare along to help explain how they did it. Even better, Oxford produced some new verse in the same style to demonstrate. At this point Shapiro notes, sadly, that the Earl's posthumous compositions weren't really up to Shakespearian standards.

He takes a similar approach throughout this excellent book. To take on the conspiracy theorists (I refuse to call them Anti-Stratfordians), James Shapiro gives them what they ask for and takes them seriously, explaining not just their viewpoint but the underlying assumptions that got them there. Knowing all the while, of course, that by doing so he will be allowing them to start holding séances with deceased noblemen, claiming that the Earl of Oxford was the son and incestuous lover of Queen Elizabeth on whom he fathered the Earl of Southampton or indulging in spectacular feats of circular logic:
"Why is there no mention of the plays being written by someone else?"
"It was such common knowledge that no one ever mentioned it"
"How can you tell?"
"By the fact that nobody ever mentioned it"
The only thing that rattles him at all is the increasingly prevalent belief in our culture that "balance" and "impartiality" bestow the right of equal coverage on any theorist who shouts loud enough regardless of the sanity of their theory.

Fortunately, this is not a book which wastes its time examining the detailed claims of Oxfordians and others.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
63 of 70 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Bard Deniers 18 April 2010
By Diacha
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
Professor James Shapiro's "Contested Will" is an entertaining and scholarly romp through the history of the dispute about who wrote Shakespeare's plays.

Shapiro writes with commanding authority - his scholarship is evident throughout, down to the very minutiae of such things as Elizabethan typesetting practices - and with a storyteller's natural gift. And this is a great story to tell: full of cranks, skullduggery,large egos and big guns.

The debate over authorship began in earnest in the second half of the nineteenth century. The paucity of detailed knowledge of Shakespeare's life and the apparent irreconcilability of what little was known with the erudition and aristocratic voice of the plays led many to question whether this "third-rate play actor" could really have authored such works of genius. A cast of rather obsessive individuals stepped in to advocate a broad range of alternative authors. Shapiro focuses mainly on two: Francis Bacon, whose cause was espoused by the American teacher Delia (no relation) Bacon and the 17th Earl of Oxford, advanced by failed sect preacher, J.T. Looney. Many eminent people subscribed to the cause of one or other claimant: Twain, Helen Keller, Freud, James, Orson Welles, various U.S. Supreme Court justices, Derek Jacobi and Mark Rylance among them.

Shapiro himself is a convinced Stratfordian. In "Contested Will," he patiently and respectfully (for example, he pre-empts sniggers about nominative determinism by explaining that Looney's family name is pronounced to rhyme with "boney") unpicks the arguments for the main pretenders.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
15 of 17 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars The Play's the Thing 2 April 2011
By Steven
Format:Paperback
Shapiro's earlier book, 1599, was a work of genius. I approached Contested Will with a little more caution, however - the hook seemed less obvious, the trail and approach possibly a bit too scholarly, academic and dry for my tastes. Where 1599 was all about Shakespeare, his plays and that specific year, the whole point to Contested Will seemed to be that old Shakey might not even be there.

But the scheme of the book is logical and, after a slow start, quite compelling. Shapiro sets out his stall by examining how historians and critics first came to question the available evidence of Shakespeare's existence and the authenticity of the plays. After that he lays bare the history of the two most prominent counter-claimants - Bacon and Oxford - before weighing in with his own evidence for the Bard. While the arguments and beliefs of people such as Freud, Twain, Keller and the (unfortunately-named) Looney are fascinating in themselves, and Shapiro's own wry commentary on those beliefs is priceless, without Shakespeare's own presence in the narrative there does seem to be something lost from the core of the book.

What I do firmly agree with is Shapiro's rubbishing of the theory (developed most strongly by Keller and Twain) that an author can only "write what he knows" - that imagination is unimportant or irrelevant, and that Shakespeare, as an upstart from the shires rather than a court-educated nobleman, could not have possessed the breadth of knowledge to write on such a variety of subjects.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars 37 Plays in search of a (Worthy) Author
James Shapiro examines why some famous people (eg Freud, Mark Twain) and some not so famous people (eg Delia Bacon, JT Looney) came to believe that William Shakespeare of Stratford... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Barry Gale
5.0 out of 5 stars Contoversial
This has been pondered about for decades. Very interesting arguments, but not conclusive either way. We will probably never know.
Published 3 months ago by J. C. CRONIN
5.0 out of 5 stars Masterful
This is a wonderful book, thoroughly researched and beautifully written. I thought the author's last book, 1599, was a triumph and I enjoyed this book nearly as much. Read more
Published 6 months ago by Nimz
4.0 out of 5 stars Will
Interesting slant both on the issue of authorship and various times in history. prologue and epilogu are excellent summaries and introductions to greater detail.
Published 8 months ago by emeritus
5.0 out of 5 stars More arguments about poor Shakespeare
A very entertainingly written investigation of the possibility that Will Shakespeare didn't actually write his plays.It is almost convincing but only ..almost
Published 8 months ago by angela haworth
4.0 out of 5 stars Sweep away this madness...
I'd always ignored the so-called Shakespeare authorship question, because I think it's irrelevant. I don't care who wrote Shakespeare's plays, because it's the plays that count,... Read more
Published 12 months ago by Kirk McElhearn
5.0 out of 5 stars Persuasive
I confess that Shapiro's views on Shakespeare are an advanced and scholarly version of my own thoughts so his viewpoint was unlikely to disappoint. Read more
Published 14 months ago by Mr. G. Nurser
4.0 out of 5 stars Did he or didn't he?
...write the plays, this was a follow up from watching the film 'Anonymous' I was very interesting and plausible , gave you an insight into the life and times , possible to... Read more
Published 15 months ago by Ann Cunningham
5.0 out of 5 stars Will Power
I recall back in 1978, my English teacher noted the theories that Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare's plays,and said "Shakespeare's plays were written by Shakespeare". Read more
Published 17 months ago by Franz Bieberkopf
4.0 out of 5 stars so much for conspiracy theories
I got this after watching the film Anonymous, with the patently absurd theory that the plays were written by the Earl of Oxford. Read more
Published 21 months ago by Mr. P. Skeldon
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Look for similar items by category