- Hardcover: 480 pages
- Publisher: Mysterious Press; First edition edition (13 Sep 1990)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0712638709
- ISBN-13: 978-0712638708
- Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars See all reviews (22 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,087,384 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
Bud White in an unmarked, watching the "1951" on the City Hall Christmas tree blink. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Bud White in an unmarked, watching the "1951" on the City Hall Christmas tree blink. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Excerpt | Back Cover
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Definitely a masterpiece. Superlatives become a bit useless when you're this affected by a book. I had weird dreams whilst reading it and every now and then particularly nasty scenes still pop into my head. All in all it's not a particularly 'nice' book - but the style, rhythm and language are so well delivered that I found it impossible to stop reading, once I'd got used to the slang (an arcane mixture of 50's Americana and cop-speak e.g. cooze, statch rapo) The slang examples give you a taste of the subject matter, I don't think the film really does - the whole novel is so much darker and intense. I find that statement quite surprising since when I saw the film I was staggered by how dense it was. The novel is just so much more.
A few statements:
Complex - understatement of the year! I thought the film was complex! The screenplay has stripped away vast tracts of criminal conspiracy. If they'd been more faithful they would have had a 16 hour masterpiece, but I guess it would have been difficult to sell!! It's worth using a notepad to keep track of characters names and details. Every character has some role to play.
Punchy - no wasted dialogue, in fact no wasted adjectives or other grammatical niceties. A scene from the film that lasts ten minutes is dispatched in one page (chapter 20 I think). I re-read that chapter about ten times, showed it to my friends who had also seen the film. That single chapter is the best example of Ellroy's writing. He builds characters, motives and locations so well that every so often he can accelerate the action by stripping away everything until all that's left is the core action. And, man the action is good!
Dark - there are no such thing as goodies and baddies for Ellroy. The good guys are often particularly nasty. Some bad guys have legimate reasons for acting as such. The only common demoninator is that nearly everyone is corrupt. For this reason I wouldn't necessarily recommend this book to anyone unless I knew they'd like it. Sounds a bit paradoxical I know. This is a nasty book in places but when you consider that Ellroy's mother was murdered when he was very young you start to realise he may trying to exorcise his own personal demons.
So if you're a big fan of noir, like Millenium, Seven, the Big Heat and other such like then I think you'll like it.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
How can anyone say that the film stuck closely to the book? They are completely different and both completely amazing works of art in their own medium and own right. For a start, the film as I remember it is over a time span of, at the msot, 2 years whereas the film is vitually the whole of the 1950's.
As this is a review of the book, I will shut up about the film, but you should see it.
The book is quite simply the best novel I have ever read. I am scared to read any other Ellroy novels, for fear that they just will not compete.
It takes a while to get used to the staccato style but once you do, you realise the brilliance in it - it makes you think in the main character's thought processes, not in narrative action. The character development is quite stunning, one minute you side with Exley, the next with White, the next with Vincennes. and none of them are anywhere near perfect, all flawed characters, we empathise and sympathise at different times. One minute I hated Exley, the next I was almost crying for him.
The ending is, in my mind, better than the films, although (and I am trying not to spoil it for you), there is some unfinished business that makes you mad, until you realise that it is more realistic. The last paragraph before the short ending chapter is quite magnificent in summing up Los Angeles in the 1950's, using the metaphor of 2 of the less major characters.
When I first read it, I was actually in LA which made it all the more real, and it was only after I had travelled up to Alcatraz and seen that Mickey Cohen was a real person (he did time on the island), that I realised some of the bit-part players were 'real-people'. This only serves to make an already confusing book more confusing as you never know which events in the book really happened and which didn't. Further, the Raymond Dieterling character is extremely similar to Walt Disney, which, considering what happens in the story, is quite spooky, and Ellroy must have sailed close to the wind in terms of libel.
There is no way that the book could have been exactly copied into film format, without it being a 12 hour epic (I wouldn't mind though!), as the book has so many charatcers and subplots, 3 hours is just not enough. On the second read I discovered more and understood more and I 'm sure by the tenth read I will still be discoveing new things. The first time you read the book, once you have finished, you fell like you have climbed Everest - -you really do have to concentrate. But it is entirely worth it. This review is garbled and it is only because I am still so excited by the book that i am just typing as I think.
Read it then watch the film. Or the other wat around. It doesn't really matter.
One last thing...you will never look at Mickey Mouse in the same way again!
As this is a review of the book, I will shut up about the film, but you should see it.
The book is quite simply the best novel I have ever read. I am scared to read any other Ellroy novels, for fear that they just will not compete.
It takes a while to get used to the staccato style but once you do, you realise the brilliance in it - it makes you think in the main character's thought processes, not in narrative action. The character development is quite stunning, one minute you side with Exley, the next with White, the next with Vincennes. and none of them are anywhere near perfect, all flawed characters, we empathise and sympathise at different times. One minute I hated Exley, the next I was almost crying for him.
The ending is, in my mind, better than the films, although (and I am trying not to spoil it for you), there is some unfinished business that makes you mad, until you realise that it is more realistic. The last paragraph before the short ending chapter is quite magnificent in summing up Los Angeles in the 1950's, using the metaphor of 2 of the less major characters.
When I first read it, I was actually in LA which made it all the more real, and it was only after I had travelled up to Alcatraz and seen that Mickey Cohen was a real person (he did time on the island), that I realised some of the bit-part players were 'real-people'. This only serves to make an already confusing book more confusing as you never know which events in the book really happened and which didn't. Further, the Raymond Dieterling character is extremely similar to Walt Disney, which, considering what happens in the story, is quite spooky, and Ellroy must have sailed close to the wind in terms of libel.
There is no way that the book could have been exactly copied into film format, without it being a 12 hour epic (I wouldn't mind though!), as the book has so many charatcers and subplots, 3 hours is just not enough. On the second read I discovered more and understood more and I 'm sure by the tenth read I will still be discoveing new things. The first time you read the book, once you have finished, you fell like you have climbed Everest - -you really do have to concentrate. But it is entirely worth it. This review is garbled and it is only because I am still so excited by the book that i am just typing as I think.
Read it then watch the film. Or the other wat around. It doesn't really matter.
One last thing...you will never look at Mickey Mouse in the same way again!
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
This was my introduction to Ellroy, and crime writing in general. I was encouraged to read the book as a result of watching the film, and was more than rewarded, as the scope of the book far surpasses the film. Nothing is wasted, after the first read the novel seems amazingly complex, yet nothing is unnecessary, this is a tightly written book. It survives and improves on re-reading, as further links between characters and events are discovered. The characterisation is enough to keep you interested, they are beautifully rendered and provoke strong emotion in the reader, you actually care about them. While graphic at times and quite dark, the novel does not depress, it is realistic. Ellroy portrays his LA world in such depth that I was strongly encouraged to read more of his work, and was similarly encouraged by The Black Dahlia, and now intend to work through pre-LA Confidential Dudley Smith work.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
"Some men get the world, some men get ex-hookers and a trip to...
Bold, bloody, ambitious and brutal. Ellroy's heroes share the same characteristics as his writing. LA 1951. Read more
Published 6 months ago by The Big Pink One
Noir evolution
First a couple of things: you may have seen the movie, but the book is something else altogether - it is simply impossible to render L.A. Confidential in two hours. Read more
Published 11 months ago by reader 451
wow!
brilliant, one of my top 5 books of all time, the scale is huge and in all honesty its probably one of those rare occasions when it could be useful to watch the film first just to... Read more
Published 11 months ago by c
Brilliant gritty book
This book is considerably more gritty than the film, but that's actually a good thing. While the film showed quite a bit of underground glamour, there was much more to the scenes... Read more
Published 12 months ago by Judge
`Opportunities fall easy - you pay for them later.'
This novel is the third in James Ellroy's L.A. Quartet, and is set in Los Angeles in the period between 1951 and 1958. Read more
Published 17 months ago by J. Cameron-Smith
Fabulous book
I enjoyed this book very much - not as great as The Black Dahlia in my opinion and I enjoyed the movie more than the book. Read more
Published 20 months ago by S. Holmes
Devastatingly brilliant
Picking up where 'The Big Nowhere' left off, 'L.A Confidential' explodes straight into action in the prologue. Read more
Published 20 months ago by THE Music Enthusiast
Confusing, detailed and brilliant
Every time I picked this book up I found it tricky to get into, but with a bit of perseverance I was hooked again and reluctant to put it down. Read more
Published on 7 Nov 2009 by Sulkyblue
Unreadable
I have now had six attempts to read this and never got past page 30.
It is an unreadable collection of proper nouns.
It is an unreadable collection of proper nouns.
Published on 14 May 2009 by Officer Dibble
Hang on, you're in for a real ride...
From the first page you know you are in for something different. Ellroy has a very distinctive style that is a real tour de force of showing, not telling the reader what is goingh... Read more
Published on 31 Mar 2009 by Stunt Goat
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
