I'm surprised that no one has commented in depth about this unusual novel; in particular that it's obviously a comedy, though a very dark one. As with any comedy, the characters are archetypes and grossly exaggerated bufoons, such as in the *Comedia del Arte.* The story opens with Mr. Rock, who functions as a sort of *Il Dottore,* who is typically erudite and has made a famous discovery. (We never do learn what Mr. Rock's boon to science is.) There are the *Innamorati,* Elizabeth and Sebastian, who are overly-dramatic and selfish lovers. And above all there are the *Pantalones,* the repulsive characters of Miss Baker and Miss Edge, who are obsessed with retaining their power and position while suppressing all expression of humanity in their charges, rebellious adolescent girls. Also typical of the *Comedia del Arte* is that there's a great deal of deceit happening, as everyone tries to evade or misrepresent the truth.
Despite the exaggerated characters, the novel has a clever, fast-paced story, and it reads like a quaint English murder mystery. Two girls are missing. Are they dead? Have they tried to escape this institution of suppression? Wouldn't you?
I would like to read a cogent analysis of what "Concluding" really means. What's it's point? The book was written at the dawn of the British welfare state, and throughout the novel the State looms ominously. Mr. Rock expects the State to provide for him and honor his great accomplishment. Ms. Edge and Ms. Baker try and manipulate the State to secure their hold on power, but they are ignored.
Tension builds until a letter arrives from the State Council which has decided, without consulting any of the characters, to turn this girls school, a grotto of wormy innocence, into a pig farm.
Well, that reads precisely like something out of Ayn Rand. An all-powerful state heaping disaster upon everyone's already-repulsive lives by the uncaring decree of a committee. Has Green (the pen name of Henry Vincent Yorke 1905-1973) used a black *Comedia del Arte* farce to express his crypto-libertarian views? The other reviewers here all agree what a fine novelist Green was, but that's all they are able to parrot.
American novels typicaly have at least one hero, an agreeable character that the reader identifies with or cheers on. Even such hapless protagonists as George F. Babbitt, Elmer Gantry, Sherman McCoy, or even Clyde Griffiths are treated in a generally sympathetic manner. But in British novels, those of Martin Amis for example, it is not unusual to present an entire cast of rotters, the point being that they get just what's coming to them.
This is such a novel.
Curiously, on page 217 one of the headmistresses says, "He flaunts our authority." That is incorrect, and the word should be "flouts," but I don't know if Green may have made made this mistake deliberately.