It is rare when a recognized poet, at the very height
of his talent, gives up the maneuvers and troupes that
gained him success, turns away--to begin something
completely new. "It is myself that I revise," Yeats
wrote. And in this powerful new collection, Gregory
Orr does just that. "Concerning the Book that Is the
Body of the Beloved" is a 200 page long spiritual
mediation of epic proportion, described as "an
incantatory celebration of the Book, an imaginary and
self-gathering anthology of all the lyrics-both poems
and songs-ever written." The description is apt, but
somewhat limiting. For in addition to its imaginary
epic ambition to be "an anthology gathered / since the
beginning of time, / gathering itself" the book also
serves as an ars poetica, a declaration of this poet's
intent to be open ("the poem didn't express / emotion,
it was emotion") in giving the voice ("to give form /
to her love and grief") to the deceased, and in doing
so to find his voice's origin. Orr's philosophy
touches upon the limitation of human reach ("unable to
touch / the body of the beloved because / inches of it
cover your skin"), uttering ("do words outlast / the
world / they describe?") and vision ("too many
mysteries... Why don't we stop") to propose the feeling
as the key to our understanding of our being here ("to
see the beloved, / to be seen by the beloved: / that's
where being starts"). His philosophy is very
skillfully grounded by the intimate details of this
world: "When my kids look for me I hope / they can
find min in the house, / or reach me by phone. // When
that won't work, / I hope they can find me in... the
poem or song someone wrote / or one of my own." This
grounding of the subliminal is very effective as the
collection proceeds to offer elegies to Orr's brother,
love poems to his wife, and moving invocations of
authors of various times, from Sapho to Apollinaire.
Observing his own time, Orr also serves an angry
indictment of the stagnation taking place in today's
literary arena, of writers who are "half-asleep" in
their work, who "could care less". For Orr cares. The
passion ("to feel, to feel, to feel") is evident.
Orr invests an enormous amount of emotional energy
("for me, my brother / ...the first departure / that
tore my heart") in the brief, spare lyrics. That is,
perhaps, what makes the book work so well: the volume
of Orr's voice can be loud or quiet, a whisper or an
incantation, but it is always emotionally charged,
always appealing to the reader's senses. It is by the
way of the heart that his wisdom comes: "You might
think the things I say / are too simple for words, /
too embarrassing to be spoken. // But if I repeat the
obvious, / where's the harm in that? // May be it was
always simple: / loss surrounds us".
The book's larger frame is the imaginary spiritual
text of "a self gathering of poems" that bear witness
to the world in which they are written, providing the
key to that world. This clear but quite ambitious
structure is balanced by Orr's skill as a poet. For
instance, he can be very musical: "Scar they stare at.
/ Scar they're scared of...a brightness that frightens."
He can also show how directness can reflect one's
inner turmoil, achieving insight: "A few things you
might want to know: / I am not an idiot. / I am not a
mystic. I've read / poems since before most people /
on the planet were born. / Read them and written them,
too. All the time believing they helped / me to live.
I was right. But / I was also wrong. /...Loss seemed to
me / the most of it. I believed in love / but I
thought its name was loss. / And worse: when I said
"life" / I meant "death." When I said "death" / I have
no idea what I meant."
What is most astonishing for me about "Concerning the Book
that is the Body of the Beloved" is that is
constitutes a book-long spiritual undertaking that's
also-unlike most projects of this sort--is very good
and readable poetry. Orr's charged and emotional lyric
reminds of Song of Songs' musical tide ("The world
comes into the poem./The poem comes into the
world./...As with lovers:/When it's right you can't
say/who is kissing whom") as well as the plain-spoken
intensity of Rumi. The composition of his collection
as a whole, however, and the thinking behind it, are
quite complex--in a way Edmond Jabes's work is a
complex tapestry ("I read the book for years / and
never understood a word") where the meaning is given
for a moment, and then taken away; but the
understanding remains. It is a wonderful, moving book. I recommend it highly.
--Ilya Kaminsky