| ||||||||||||||||||
|
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Contemporary art is post-conceptual art,
This review is from: Conceptual Art (Themes & Movements) (Hardcover)
This book fills in the gap created by the lack of institutional recognition - the recognition of this art movement in art institutions - allowing the reader to understand the pre-history of what constitutes contemporary art today, as post-conceptual. Hence the book is not using meaningless theoretical terms, but on the contrary the precise theoretical terms with which to give precise meaning and significance to this movement in art which followed post-war abstract expressionism, the latter otherwise still tending to overshadow the former.Peter Grodbecki's review registers the revulsion of the popular understanding of art (as produced by the purely intuitive expression of the genius painter) against the very idea of conceptual art. This should have been corrected by an engagement with the text, which reveals how conceptual art is constituted via its negation of abstract expressionism; that is to say, against art as being an inherently visual phenomena. And once the work of art has been reduced to a concept, to an idea, the existing understanding of art according to medium(s), which now appear as forms of actualization of an idea, becomes ontologically destroyed (ontologically, because what art most fundamentally is has changed, so the change is at the level of ontology, of the ontology of art). So this book doesn't just represent one in a series of books on themes and movements, rather it is about the most significant art movement, in terms of its mediating role, between art that came before it (post-war abstract expressionism) and that which came after it (contemporary art today, as post-conceptual), since on the one hand conceptual art failed to reduce art to a concept or idea, and yet on the other successfully challenged the existing ideology of the aesthetic, or aestheticism, and as a result fundamentally changed the form of actualization of the work of art (video, installation, documentation, essay, etc..), allowing for an infinite multiplicity of forms of actualization...
3 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Boring neo-hegelian theoreticism,
By peter grodbecki "peter" (London) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Conceptual Art (Themes & Movements) (Hardcover)
Why do so many academics think that theoria (an inability to stop using meaningless theoretical terms) is the same as thinking. If you cant sleep this will be a very helpful (if expansive) book.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) Amazon.com:
5.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)
5.0 out of 5 stars
far it goes,
By aggazzo - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Conceptual Art (Themes & Movements) (Paperback)
lots of content on the subject, far it goes on theory, and to me it is essencial when it comes to cenceptual art.. good set of photos and artists selected.
|
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|