Much has been written on the subject of climate change, so how is this work different? Urry takes a step back from the usual limited view of closed systems, and examines the notion that the social is completely embedded in both causes and potential solutions to damaging climate change. It's an effective strategy, as the author argues convincingly that without including the social aspect, strategies are unlikely to become embedded sufficiently to prove useful. The bulk of the book sees Urry take various aspects of climate change management in turn, including government, innovation and mobilities, examining them in light of their social nature. Unsurprisingly, given Urry's background in the sociology of space, his thinking on spatial issues and climate change is particularly strong.
It's a realistic book, with a focus on patterns and systems and an acceptance that when 'locked-in', these are hard to change, and reinforce themselves through positive feedback. There's some excellent analysis of what possible 'tipping points' may be for large-scale movement to a low-carbon society, and on the conditions required for these to occur. Naturally, neo-liberalism takes a good beating, with a central thrust of the book being the necessary evolution of a society-economy rather than the detached, individualistic market economy supporting a high-carbon world. Although you'll find the familiar material in here - the oil industry's conspiracy against climate change science, the evils of consumerism - the sociological links make the old arguments seem fresh and challenging again. Urry is also realistic enough to admit the importance of fashion and fad, and admit that these will not go away, and must form part of the solution.
Stylistically however, I think this book misses a trick somehow. Some passages are tirelessly academic, and would lose the average reader amidst the sociological name-dropping and jargon. This is a shame, as Urry's message is of such importance that a work like this should be as accessible and convincing as possible to as many people as possible. That said, most of the book's ten short chapters are not too marred by this slightly stuffy edge. Some sections are brilliantly constructed and even gripping, driving home the author's arguments with colourful descriptions linked to real-world examples (Dubai serving as an excellent example of the absurdity of current carbon-greed).
Also, the chapter of imagined future worlds has a touch of the flights of fancy about it, which took an edge of seriousness away from the chapters before it. Dan Gardner in Future Babble recently echoed the age-old warnings to anyone trying to imagine the future, that they will most likely look silly in hindsight. That said, the arguments supporting the four projections in this book are well-balanced, with reasons for and against their likelihood, and they serve well to illustrate some of the points made earlier.
Everything considered, it's an excellent and concise examination of climate change placed correctly in its interconnected social and economic contexts. Social scientists - students and practitioners alike - will get a lot from its discussion of social practices as an undeniable part of the picture. Certainly a book that policy-makers should take notice of, and one exploring issues that everybody should be thinking about.