As a young man I remember hearing dire warnings of imminent environmental disasters whether it was from neo-Malthusians arging for population timebombs or from those who claimed that oil reserves would run out, a new ice age was about to begin. These warnings were not confined to the dreaming spires of the academes but were found in books and newspapers and on television. I viewed these with some concern rather than alarm and responded in a political way with letters to politicians etc.
At the time I was unaware of the opposing arguements and it was only prior to embarking on my first undergraduate degree that I discovered the writings of Julian Simon and began to understand that the scientific and academic communities were split by conflicting views about our environment. Later my interest in the notion of Gaia from a different view brought me into contact with that debate in which I have maintained an interest ever since.
This book in conjunction with the Skeptical Environmentalist which I have reviewed elsewhere, gives some perspective on a serious debate which should be a concern to each of us. Certainly here in the United States there is considerable disquiet among the general population, encouraged by the media about impending doom caused through climatic change. Indeed on the Weather Channel only moments ago was a commercial for a show based on the assumption that a category 5 hurricane will flood Manhattan. Six years ago there was serious concern about massive winds which would destroy much of the nation's infrastructure which it was alleged, struck at the end of each century. Now every hurricane event or deviation from some "norm" is seen as evidence of impending disaster.
The trouble is that although it is foolish to deny that the climate is not changing, there is no accepted agreement on the nature or extent of that change. While stories and reports of alarm are sensationalist and sell copies, the media does not present a balanced debate and the general public are not equipped to deal with the scientific arguemnts.
This little book has it's bias but it makes it clear what that is. What I really like about this book is that it gives to the reasonably educated person, say to A-level or High School Diploma standard, some of the information from a contrary point of view to what appears in the general media. From this point of view it is an ideal book for science and other students or the reasonably informed lay reader to be able to give a perspective on the serious matter under debate. Whether you agree with the notions or not, surely it is in our interests as a general population to have a better understanding of some of the forces which face us and our children and our children's children's future for many years to come.