How many classics albums would you say have been released over the past 3 years? Obviously not enough, because now Ministry of Sound, a brand name more than a club to be seen at, has felt the need to release yet another one.
With the Euphoria series already releasing about 4, cream released just a couple, Gatercrasher released 2 (and this tracklisting looks almost identical to that of GC Classics 2!) and many other non-recognised labels cashing in, does anyone know where the market is for these albums? Anyone who lived to hear these tracks back in the day (late 90's/early noughties) will already have the original albums - DJ mixed with some inspiration, and younger buyers already have a glut of choice from over the past 3 years. I don't think anyone will disagree if I said the following tracks have been on at least 15 albums over the past 2 years alone...
9PM - ATB, Beautiful - Matt Darey, and of course, Saltwater - Chicane.
Their is nothing wrong with the tracks on the album. The problem is that labels have the cheek to ask us fifteen quid to hear the same songs over and over again, and newcomer's honestly don't understand the difference between a modern box set album - computer mixed, and a leather-book cased Ministry of Sound album from the 90's. If you were to listen to Boy George's 'juggling' (switching between tracks to create a back and forth effect) between Firestarter and Born Slippy on The Annual vol.2, you'd never go back to any of these album's. Their are countless more examples or true quality - Gatecrasher Wet, which had the amazing fresh, liquid theme running through it. Renaissance The Mix Collection 2, which is undoubtedly, the finest dance album ever created. Or Northern Exposure?...
And what about songs like Born Slippy, which to many 'vetrans' is considered one of the best songs of the 90's? It just doesn't make sense to include it on an album like this. The lyrics in the song sum a time from 'the baggy' days when clubbing was a venue for anybody - now its a place to be seen. If your going to listen to it, it would make more sense to listen to it on an original album (The Annual vol.2), rather than releasing it for a current generation on clubbing that's absolutely flooded with money, whether its wages, or ticket prices. Clubbing is unfortunately, no longer an innocent place to go.
The only true artist of dance albums is the DJ himself, who chooses the songs, and uses his own inspiration to mix it (not PC software). So your probably wondering 'Why don't they just hire a DJ?' Its simple really - the cost. Pete Tong, for example, now wants (get ready) 20 thousand pounds to play 'a set' in Ibiza. One set. So can you imagine his wages, with the earnings from sales, with an album? This is why record labels should bring in younger, newer DJ's. Remember, when Judge Jules started mixing the Ministry of Sound albums, even he was quite young and innocent!
So, when you look at 'another' classics album on the shelve in a shop, ask yourself... would you rather buy a souless mix of radio edits on an album with no character? Or pay a little bit more for a real album from the 90's where you can hear ever vinyl crackle, every distortion, and have the knowledge of owning something truly special?
If your still looking for a new album however, that at least reatains some quality, Cream Summer 2007 and Ministry of Sounds Session's 2007 look pretty tasty - whats more, the latest Session's album is mixed by some newcomers. Joy!
Thumbs Up: Well, there are 2 brilliant tracks that thankfully have yet to be hammered - Arms of Loren is a feel good track from 1996 (used on The Annual vol.2 - need I say more?) and Lizard by Mauro Picotto was a good'un from 1999.
Thumbs Down: Need I say? This is hardly worth buying for the only 2/3 dusty tracks.
Summary: You may or may not agree with what I've just said. But, as a vetran clubber, someone who has countless dance albums from the 90's, and knows what real dance music is, I can only try to tell you how much music and attitudes have changed. This album is just 'another' complimation....