Hollywood Robbery-Homicide Detective Lena Gamble is the central character in a contemporary serial killer thriller set against a backdrop of forest-fire ravaged Los Angeles. The media cynically nickname the vicious killer Romeo, not the most accurate of descriptions as there is nothing romantic about his modus operandi. But the reader knows exactly who Romeo is from a relatively early stage, knowing his name, where he works and most importantly his motives and twisted psychology. Meanwhile the burden that Lena Gamble perpetually bears is the memory of her late brother, a successful rock star who was shot dead five years earlier but whose murder was never solved.
The most interesting character in City of Fire is probably Romeo, the serial killer everyone wants to track down. All the others, including Lena Gamble, are rather forgettable individuals which means that the novel depends heavily on the basic story. Fortunately that element comes to the rescue of the book's quest for success, because not only is it a mostly gripping story from start to finish, it also contains what were for me a couple of thick and juicy surprise twists at the end that I really hadn't seen coming at all. There's a degree of clever reader manipulation going on here, because your emotions will swing one way then the other and maybe swing yet again, in a novel containing characters that you start out liking but end up detesting, and vice versa. In truth though that's suggesting that I really cared about the good guys when there was never a time that I did. I'm not sure if this is the first in a series to feature Lena Gamble, but it's a marginal call as to whether she cuts it sufficiently to carry one alone. The inevitable comparison would be Harry Bosch, created and perfected by Michael Connelly who gives this novel a plug on the front cover. But Bosch is several leagues above in terms of characterisation and how much the reader cares, because Lena Gamble is nothing special.
In spite of that, the novel is definitely worth reading, and although it's a touch too long in the middle the ending is excellent and full of surprises, so it's not a mistake to reveal the killer's identity so soon by any means. In hindsight, it couldn't have been done any other way. One of the highlights was the detailed examination of Romeo's psychopathic personality, something that few serial-killer novel writers attempt to do but Ellis does so with conviction and skill.