The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant (1) - Lord Foul's Bane [Paperback]

 

 

Create your own review

I was recommended to read this book 15 years ago and have never regretted it. The book's adult themes are dealt with extremely well, Donaldson's literary skills paint a masterful and vivid picture of a beautiful yet haunted Land on the brink of apocalypse. The author has a fantastic capability of bringing the past to the present, and evokes strong emotions as he draws the reader into the plot. Having read how Stephen Donaldson receives his inspiration I am amazed he can churn out such complex stories so consistently (read the rest of the chronicles and be in awe!) I have read and re-read this masterpiece and its sequels, and never fail to be impressed and honoured at having had the chance to read what is in my opinion one of the best fantasy tales of the last 50 years.

Lord Foul's Bane, the first of Stephen Donaldson's Thomas Covenant series, predates the 1980s fantasy boom. It would probably have been very easy for Donaldson to knock out a hackneyed Tolkien rip-off like later authors would.

But he didn't. Ignore those reviewers on this site who think that the plot is a Tolkien rip-off; it isn't. It's a fantasy setting, there's a quest, there's a ring. That's about it in terms of common themes. Tolkien wanted to create myths; Donaldson is trying something altogether more literary in the fantasy genre.

I say "trying" because arguably he didn't succeed. Literary critics I think were put off by the fantasy setting. Fantasy readers were often put off by the lead character and the "strangled prose" (more on that below). Thomas Covenant is often described as an anti-hero, but that puts him in the same category as say Elric or Blake's 7's Avon. Covenant isn't a badass sociopath like those two; sociopath yes (but with good reason - 20th century society has turned on him out of prejudice because of his leprosy), but he's too self-pitying (massively so), cowardly, useless, whinging and snivelly to be badass. He is not remotely aspirational as a character, so he's neither hero nor antihero.

And many people cannot deal with that. Many people (including most of the people who gave the book negative reviews on this site) seem to want the lead characters in the books that they read to be either obvious good guys or at worst flawed good guys. Well, if you think like that, then this book is not going to be for you. Walk away now and go and read Harry Potter again. And when you've finished that, move on to Dragonlance or something.

I mentioned what has been described as the author's "strangled prose". SF critic Dave Langford referred to Donaldson as suffering from 'OEDemia'. In short, Donaldson loves his thesaurus. He will use words that are to say the least, uncommon. This never really bothered me, but it might bother you. Again, be warned.

Donaldson's world isn't fleshed out anywhere near as well as other epic fantasy settings, he didn't make up his own languages and he lacks the gift for good fantasy names (yes, there really was a High Lord Kevin). But somehow out of all this, Donaldson came through with one of the great achievements of the fantasy genre. No fantasy author has taken so much trouble over one character as Donaldson did with Covenant. (Let's be honest, most fantasy authors, even the good ones, tend not to waste time on character development when they could be inventing three different languages and drawing maps of their world...)

Much of this first book concerns Covenant's struggles in coming to terms with whether 'The Land' is real or not and the fact that he is healthy, not leprous. In The Land, he is a hero; back home in America, he is an outcast leper. There is a quest involving characters going from point A on the map to point B, just like in many other fantasy epics. Here though, the journey is as much psychological as geographical.

So like I said, not for everyone. It's not a book to persevere with either. If you don't like it after the first few chapters, you won't like the rest of the book. Or the other two books in the trilogy. Or the three books in the 'Second Chronicles'. Or the two books (and counting) in the 'Final Chronicles'. But you might be in that minority of readers who believe fantasy can be challenging. And if you are, you might, just might, think that Lord Foul's Bane is the start to one of the best fantasy series ever written.

This is one of the best books I have read, the characters have a wonderful depth and color and there are always things to learn about them. This makes the book very beleivable. It is a mature read which means it can get very heavy at times. The further through the series I got the more I enjoyed it. The second series of books took a different stance from the first series where the 'land' has been desecrated and is on the verge of dying, Covenant and co have to fightfor the lands survival. Breathtaking !

This series of books should take pride of place on everyones bookshelf, if it ever gets there because you just cannot put them down.

Other books in the series are:

Lord Fouls Bane, Ill Earth War, Power that Preserves

The Wounded Land, The One Tree, White Gold Weilder

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 19 customer reviews...

 

2.0 out of 5 stars A struggle to finish
When I like a book, I will normally finish it in a couple of days. This book took me about 5 weeks to finish. Read more

Published on 9 Feb 2010 by Mr. R. Williams

3.0 out of 5 stars Do I like it, or not? I can't tell...
Honestly I really don't know if I like this book or not. When its good, it's very good. When its bad.. well you can probably guess. Read more

Published on 3 July 2009 by Lee Chiswell

1.0 out of 5 stars Utterly pointless
I kept wondering whether this book was intended to be a satire on the fantasy genre, and if so when would it get funny?

Sadly, I fear that Mr. Read more

Published on 8 Jan 2009 by Baz

1.0 out of 5 stars Hugely disappointing
The opening chapters make you sit up and think... a leper hero what a great idea, something really good is going to come out of this. Read more

Published on 31 July 2008 by ajk77

3.0 out of 5 stars Bizarre
I've tried to read this book several times over the years, at the vehement urging of my mother, who, ironically, has never been able to get past the first book herself. Read more

Published on 24 Dec 2006 by S. Brotherston

4.0 out of 5 stars Irresistable
The writing shows a great imagination and contains an irresistable storyline. All the usual fantasy epic criteria are there and if you love Tolkien you'll love this...

Published on 22 Aug 2006 by Defunkt

1.0 out of 5 stars The least likeable character in any book you'll read
I bought this book largely because of the hype it had on it, claiming it was a great classic; and , well, it was different. Read more

Published on 17 Oct 2003 by Mr. A. Milne

3.0 out of 5 stars Skilled writing, moody anti-hero, hackneyed 70s fantasy plot
This classic fantasy series with Donaldson's bitter anti-hero Thomas Covenant was published in 1977, at the height of the Tolkein-inspired fantasy revival. Read more

Published on 20 Feb 2003 by scottandrews6

3.0 out of 5 stars Not a new Tolkien
Comparable to Tolkien at his best, the blurb reads, but that should really read "at his best, comparable to Tolkien". Read more

Published on 10 May 2001

1.0 out of 5 stars Rubbish
... The hero (or anti hero whether the distinction is meaningful or not) commits rape early on in the book, are we really meant to relate to that? Read more

Published on 18 Feb 2001 by wadda50@hotmail.com

Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

› See all 19 customer reviews...

Search Listmania!