This book makes a major contribution to the ongoing debate about the synoptic problem, especially concerning the question of which gospel was written first. The scholarly consensus, developed over two hundred years of discussion, has favoured Markan priority and the dependence of both Matthew and Luke upon Mark. In an ongoing contemporary revival of the Griesbach hypothesis, some scholars have advocated the view that Mark used, conflated and abbreviated Matthew and Luke. The author explores the role played by arguments connected with christological development in support of both these views. Deploying a comparative redaction-critical approach to the problem, Dr Head argues that the critical basis of the standard christological argument for Markan priority is insecure and based on anachronistic scholarly concerns. Nevertheless, in a through-going comparative reappraisal of the christological outlooks of Matthew and Mark the author finds decisive support for the hypothesis of Markan priority, arguing that Matthew was a developer rather than a corrector of Mark.
| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. Learn more. |
Book Description
Product details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.
Product Description
Review
"It will be an important acquisition for libraries and interested specialists." Daniel A. Smith, Religious Studies Review
Book Description
This book makes a major contribution to the ongoing debate about which of the synoptic gospels was written first. Using the christological criterion, Dr Head argues against the revival of interest in the Griesbach Hypothesis (this claimed that Mark had used, conflated and abbreviated Matthew and Luke) in favour of Markan priority.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
Forty years ago the two-source hypothesis was accepted by the vast majority of New Testament scholars as the fundamental solution to the synoptic problem. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Forty years ago the two-source hypothesis was accepted by the vast majority of New Testament scholars as the fundamental solution to the synoptic problem. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > History > Religious History > Christianity
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Bible > Bible Studies > New Testament > Commentaries
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Bible > Concordances
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Bible > Criticism & Interpretation
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Bible > Reference > Study > New Testament
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Jesus
- Books > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Theology > Bible > New Testament
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
