I grew up during a time period when FANGORIA magazine was popular, liquid latex was the choice medium for all special effect needs, and Horror films in general were at the height of their popularity. Those were the days of Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees and Leatherface. It was a simple time period full of killer dolls, rabid dogs, deadly Summer Camps, wise cracking demons and evil houses. It was also a time where Horror movies seemed to be escalating in audience demand and eventually, a whole new wave of the Horror scene hit the home video market. Horror directors were finding it easier to put out Horror movies with the latest trend called "direct to video" releases, which didn't require a big budget release. The method was easy. Just make the movie, slap it on to a VHS and get it out into the stores.
Now, at the time I didn't enjoy a lot of these type of movies, mainly because I just didn't give them much of a chance. Like a lot of things that most people typically dislike from their current generation, it just wasn't very easy to get into the latest "direct to video" Horror movies that filled the local rental stores. At the time, they seemed cheap and stupid. For the most part, some of them were. The biggest culprit in this problem was the endless sequels to certain Horror film franchises. HELLRAISER and CHILDREN OF THE CORN seemed to be the main ones to blame. After all, some of those HELLRAISER sequels are just awful! The "masters" of 1980's Horror (FRIDAY THE 13th and NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET) never seemed to fall victim to the "direct to video" curse.
With that being said, now that it's been about ten years since the rise and fall of "old school" Horror, I find it easier to look back on some of these "direct to video" Horror movies and enjoy them. That is before Wes Craven ruined Slasher movies with his all too egotistical SCREAM series, yet the cheaper "direct to video" Horror films actually had some pretty good releases. They weren't classics by any stretch of the word, but at least some of them retained what made Horror movies so much fun in the 1980's. Interesting special effects, horrifying gore and (most importantly of all) a sense of fun and enjoyment. If you ask my opinion, the SCREAM series and all of it's clones (URBAN LEGEND and I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER) turned the Horror scene into a ridged and "serious" exercise of the art form. Those movies were okay, they just got old after a while because it seemed like all Horror films were following in those foot steps. Thank goodness that time period is over!
Which brings us to the movie at hand here, CHILDREN OF THE CORN IV : THE GATHERING. Hey! Did you know this? Naomi Watts was in this film!?! I had no clue for many years, until recently when I decided to give one of the random CHILDREN OF THE CORN sequels another chance. Turns out I picked right because this movie isn't anywhere near as bad as I would have thought it was. If you've already seen the movie and still think it's bad, move along. I'm sure nothing I say here will change your mind. Outside of the bad cover art (can we say "cheap photoshop" anyone?) and the rather small and short production, this movie is actually kinda' fun!
Naomi Watt's plays a young woman who goes back home to her Mother (played by the always enjoyable Karen Black), who happens to live in a small town very similar to the one in the first CHILDREN OF THE CORN story. The plot to this fourth movie is rather contrived but that shouldn't hold anyone back. This movie is basically just a vehicle to get the killer children going again. The story concerns a child preacher becoming resurrected from the dead, and possessing all the kids in the entire small town. Faster than you can say "pass the corn", the kids are chanting evil phrases and chopping up the people with huge sickles!
What makes this movie work (in terms of just enjoyment) is that a good amount of the death scenes are left untouched and unedited. People get sliced to pieces, bodies get stabbed, blood gets splashed around and general weirdness ensues through the whole movie. It's nothing on the level of the original film (or the Stephen King story for that matter) but then again, it's doesn't need to be. This is just some random sequel, pumped out by the film studio and the director had fun with what they were left to work with. THE EXORCIST this is not.
The biggest problem with this movie (and I know nit picking a "direct to video" release is like beating a dead horse) is the over all pacing of the film. The entire movie builds up some rather cheap tension and then dashes it all with a quick, anti climatic ending that doesn't wrap things up for the viewer. It's a shame really because some parts of this fourth movie are actually pretty creepy!
Gore Hounds, check it out for some neat death scenes! People get lacerated cuts, fingers chopped off and stabbed brutally with corn sickles! Naomi Watt's fans, check it out to see what she was doing before THE RING (remake), KING KONG and EASTERN PROMISES. Everybody else, just rent or buy the first movie in the series. Unless you came from the same Horror back ground and scene that I did, this movie won't please many people. For "hardcore" Horror fans and collectors of CHILDREN OF THE CORN stuff only!
Over and out!