Charlie Bubbles was Albert Finney's one and only shot at directing a film. It came out at the tail end of the 1960s and is clearly inspired by a lot of European cinema such as Antonioni and/or Fellini in it's abstract directorial touches and it's pace and narrative structure.
I'm not quite sure why Finney only directed once in his career, but I can sense that this was a very personal project; one that he simply had to direct and so perhaps once done he never truly felt the need again. It is personal because it offers the tale of a very succesful man, in this case a writer, who came from humble beginning in Salford nr Manchester and who is now, at his height, feeling detached and bored, clearly craving something but he doesn't know what. Now compare this with Finney himself, a very successful man, in his case an actor, who came from humble beginnings in Salford nr Manchester and who perhaps at the time of the film was detached and bored craving a new experience and as we can see, he chose to direct.
The film is a perfect snapshot of the 60s as we imagine or recall them. For me, having lived all my life in the North West of England I well remember the deserted, desolate knocked down streets that Finney's Bubbles drives his Rolls around whilst an excitable Liza Minnelli (a great little performance) rapidly takes snap shots of anything and everything. Indeed, another little treat for anyone from the North in watching this is seeing familiar acting faces of the region such as Bryan Mosely aka Alf Roberts of Coronation Street, John Ronane of Strangers, Joe Gladwin of Last Of The Summer Wine and the Hovis ads and Arthur Pentelow aka Mr Wilks of Emmerdale Farm.
But that is not to say this film is just a nostalgia fest. Far from it, because although on the surface, the ambling narrative may appear to say little, what we actually have here is a very prescient piece on the nature of fame and celebrity, something which is all too easily obsessive for today's Britain whose public clamour for navel gazing reality and fly on the wall TV shows featuring people well exhausting their 15 minutes.
However, 1967 was markedly different in that it was a time when to be famous you had to have talent and people would appreciate you as such. These were the days when te country was more obsessed with class than with celebrity culture, so to be succesful you really did have to achieve. But at what price fame? Charlie lives life constantly detached, viewing events from behind glass, as beautifully witnessed in the scenes were he takes his son to a Man Utd game and they watch in an isolated and clinical private box; or when he returns home, to his banks of TV screens, each focusing on every aspect of the house.
In short, I would truly recommend this film to anyone who enjoys 60s cinema, and who likes a message in their movies. But don't be phased by the pace and the lack of events the film provides, the message is there, but you have to reach inside and look with your own eyes, to interact with it, something that Charlie himself finds difficult to do.