Charlie & the Chocolate Factory was one of my favourite books as a child. I liked the Gene Wilder version but agree with some other posters here it was a little 'nicey-nicey' so I was looking forward to Tim Burton/Johnny Depp's take on the story. The material seemed a perfect fit for them. Some elements of this film I liked very much: the Oompa Loompas (although I could not understand a word they said so the message was kind of lost, perhaps this was down to the cinema's sound system..), the cracking sets, the cinematography and the cast in general. HOWEVER.... as some other posters have pointed out - there was something a little 'off'... My main criticisms are around 1) the 'back story' which seemed very contrived and a bit pointless. Part of Wonka's appeal is his mysterious-ness, as if he were born under a gooseberry bush or something. Depp's catatonia as we go into his mind's eye - well basically it seemed very contrived and stopped the narrative in it's flow. It did not need to be there - or could have been done better. I liked Christopher Lee though. 2) Johnny Depp's Wonka. I liked parts of his performance - but he really did seem like a Michael Jackson clone and his mannerisms didn't seem natural, it was almost as if Johnny was showcasing his acting ability - oh look at mr 'range'! There was just something unappealing about him. Shame because generally I am a big fan.
Gene Wilder's Wonka , though not perfect, is more Wonka to me than Depp. I much preferred Wilder's simpler entrance than Depp's (clowns on fire just doesn't do it for me). Maybe combine the two and you would have the perfect screen Wonka? Still, gripes aside I mostly enjoyed this film, if only for its spectacle and because it's just a cracking story with old-fashioned values that we can all relate to - which is a comforting thought in our modern world.