Charles Dickens is one of those towering figures who needs a new biography every few years. He was a many-sided man, a kind of living literary institution in his own right. Scholars are still having a hard time pinning him down as the 200th anniversary of his birth looms in 2012.
British Dickens expert Michael Slater has produced a massively researched and closely reasoned appraisal of Dickens that presents him through the lens of his own words --- not only his 16 magnificent novels but the flood of short stories, magazine pieces, journalism, letters and speeches that poured unceasingly from his quill pen.
First of all, the book is a marvel of scholarly research. Slater has examined almost everything Dickens wrote and exposed connections that reflect Dickens's use and reuse of ideas, experiences and images in different settings throughout his whole body of work. It will be a revelation to those who know Dickens only through the novels. Slater has gone out of his way to relate those novels to lesser-known pieces and to plead the case for the centrality of those shorter pieces to any adequate assessment of the man and his life.
At the same time, the book takes full notice of all the central themes of the Dickens story: his passionate advocacy of relief for the poor, his disdain for most of the political institutions of his day, his concept of literature as a great and noble calling that requires hard work of anyone who wants to practice it, his colorful and turbulent personal life, and his passion for travel, or rather for what Slater calls "socially investigative sightseeing" --- visits to prisons, poorhouses and asylums that were not in the tourist guidebooks.
Dickens's concern for the poor led him to aim what he called "sledgehammer blows" at politicians or fatuous clergymen who ignored the problems he saw festering in the streets of London during the long nighttime walks he loved to take. It is no accident that in his novels very few if any lawyers or clergymen come off favorably.
Dickens was a control freak whose zeal for having things his way extended to criticism of the facial expressions in the illustrations for his books. In describing his famous involvement in elaborate amateur theatrical productions, Slater says again and again that Dickens was not happy unless he could control every detail of the show: casting, scenery, costumes, lighting, stage direction --- in short, the whole affair. Slater demonstrates that he was an obsessive organizer, a "born master of ceremonies."
Another major theme is Dickens's enormous capacity for work. He would be grinding out a major novel, editing a magazine, organizing a play production, and supervising the operation of a famous home for wayward girls --- all pretty much at the same time. In his early years, the writing of two novels would be going on at the same time --- he would finish up the last serial installments of one while getting started on the next and at the same time carrying on a volume of correspondence that he compared to that of "a secretary of state." Even his leisure hours were, in Slater's word, "strenuous."
Slater generally reserves his own critical judgments for the novels and stories. He is, however, candid (and critical) on Dickens's separation from his wife and on his late-in-life affair with actress Ellen Ternan. One major theme that he pretty much neglects is Dickens's shameful campaign to isolate his nine children from their mother after the separation. He concludes that no one can know for certain if Dickens and Ternan were sexually involved, and on the literary front he resists the temptation to offer a theory on how the unfinished THE MYSTERY OF EDWIN DROOD would conclude if its author had lived to tell us.
This book is the best overall treatment of the Charles Dickens phenomenon since Edgar Johnson's two-volume effort in the 1950s. Slater has taken full advantage of new Dickens material that has come to light since Johnson's day and produced a masterpiece.
--- Reviewed by Robert Finn (Robertfinn@aol.com)